Freethought & Rationalism Archive

Ted Hoffman · 09-09-2007, 07:15 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Zeichman in May 14

Hopefully it will be in shape for a final draft in about a month.

Sorry to start a new thread on this; I wanted to *bumb* the older thread but the rules apparently state that you cannot reply to a thread that is 79days old. Has anybody perused Zeichmann's response or shall we go on waiting?

EarlDoherty · 09-10-2007, 10:07 AM

Chris Zeichman has informed me that JHC (Journal of Higher Criticism) is publishing a revision of that article by him on the subject of my use of Q (and, he says, including some of Robert Price's arguments on Q). He assures me that the tone and the efficiency of his reading of my actual arguments on the subject have been much improved. I'm all for it. JHC, incidentally, is edited by Price.

Earl Doherty

Ted Hoffman · 09-10-2007, 10:40 PM

Great! I am excited to learn about this. I am all for it too. Thanks.

Thread Tools	Search this Thread
Show Printable Version	Search this Thread: Advanced Search

09-10-2007, 10:07 AM	#2
EarlDoherty Veteran Member Join Date: Oct 2005 Location: Ontario, Canada Posts: 1,435	Chris Zeichman has informed me that JHC (Journal of Higher Criticism) is publishing a revision of that article by him on the subject of my use of Q (and, he says, including some of Robert Price's arguments on Q). He assures me that the tone and the efficiency of his reading of my actual arguments on the subject have been much improved. I'm all for it. JHC, incidentally, is edited by Price. Earl Doherty

09-10-2007, 10:40 PM	#3
Ted Hoffman Veteran Member Join Date: Feb 2001 Location: "" Posts: 3,863	Great! I am excited to learn about this. I am all for it too. Thanks.

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.