Freethought & Rationalism ArchiveThe archives are read only. |
07-05-2011, 12:19 PM | #1 |
Regular Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Midwest
Posts: 140
|
The Cognitive Dissonance Theory of Christian Origins
Those interested in the Cognitive Dissonance theory of Christian origins may find this article of interest (with the disclaimer that I wrote the article).
Kris Komarnitsky |
07-05-2011, 12:56 PM | #2 |
Contributor
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: MT
Posts: 10,656
|
The article is well written, and the theory does very well to explain the myth of the resurrection. Either they believe in the resurrection or they face the reality that the cult was a huge sham. I take wishful thinking to be a fundamental facet of human nature, nobody is immune to it, and it is central to the best explanations for the largest religions. I think you have done very well to call greater focus on it.
|
07-05-2011, 12:57 PM | #3 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: N/A
Posts: 4,370
|
Quote:
Stripped of its polysyllables, I don't see how the argument is greatly different from "anyone who disagrees with us is insane. That's why they disagree with us." Now I would have thought that it was rather more rational to demonstrate logically and reasonably that one's opponent is mistaken (and oneself correct), than to presume it, and then speculate at length on the reasons why he came to be so silly, and end up presuming mental illness or the next thing to it. That would seem to be what is going on here. In addition, those of us who remember the old Soviet Union, and its abuse of pyschiatry on precisely this pretext, can only shiver when we read such statements. Soviet atheists imprisoned believers in mental hospitals with just such language as the justification, and tortured them using the tools of psychiatry to try to get them to recant. This must not be. Of course it is doubtless the case that those foolish enough to disagree with me are mentally defective in some way, and undoubtedly are morally and intellectually much my inferior (not to mention lacking in the charm, wit, wealth, superior birth, and irresistable sex-appeal with which I am endowed, not to mention the copious humility and modesty which it would be remiss of me not to mention). But a gentleman would hardly dwell on their inferiority and mental limitations. Not if he wanted a hearing, rather than a ribald remark, anyway. All the best, Roger Pearse |
|
07-05-2011, 01:18 PM | #4 |
Banned
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Gone
Posts: 4,676
|
Facts and reality are ungentlemanly and make Christians feel bad. Got it.
|
07-05-2011, 01:21 PM | #5 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: N/A
Posts: 4,370
|
|
07-05-2011, 01:45 PM | #6 |
Banned
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Gone
Posts: 4,676
|
All I know is there's not enough spots of tea or polite words or top hats and monocles in the world to make the resurrection real. You keep on trying though.
|
07-05-2011, 02:00 PM | #7 | ||
Contributor
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: MT
Posts: 10,656
|
Quote:
|
||
07-05-2011, 02:10 PM | #8 | ||
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Mondcivitan Republic
Posts: 2,550
|
Quote:
DCH |
||
07-05-2011, 02:26 PM | #9 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Mondcivitan Republic
Posts: 2,550
|
Quote:
For the naysayers (not you Kris), the effort put into dissonance reduction strategies is directly proportional to the strength of the dissonance itself. So, the bigger a deal someone makes of an opposing position/hypothesis, the more that person feels threatened by it. DCH |
|
07-05-2011, 04:49 PM | #10 | ||
Veteran Member
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: N/A
Posts: 4,370
|
Quote:
Quote:
All the best, Roger Pearse |
||
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|