Freethought & Rationalism ArchiveThe archives are read only. |
06-29-2007, 02:30 PM | #1 |
Contributor
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 14,915
|
Qur'an Information....
Just an FYI for anyone who might be interested in the Qur'an and what it contains. I found this really cool little program you can download and read it and view "commentary". I'm not muslim (or anything else for that matter) but I wanted to see for myself what exactly it does say and not have to purchase a copy. I'm sure they must have a bible versions of the program but I think this thing is soooo cool! You can get it from here if you like: http://www.soft32.com/download_4097.html
It's called the "Holy Qur'an Viewer 2.913" in case the link doesn't work. |
07-02-2007, 06:14 PM | #2 |
Banned
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: IL
Posts: 978
|
I bought a Qu'ran today at Barnes and Noble for $8.95, and copy of The Origin of Species for $7.95. The checkout lady probably thought I was quite condemned. I could have paid $22+ for a green hardback version with heavy commentary and the English and Arabic text next to each other, but I went with the cheaper version. May Allah have mercy on my soul.
One question I had was whether it mattered if it was translated by a non-Muslim as long as he is still fluent in Arabic and an authority on Islam? He taught Arabic in England but was clearly not a Muslim. And the title read "Koran" when he refered to it as the Qu'ran in the text. |
07-03-2007, 03:01 AM | #3 | |
Junior Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 39
|
Quote:
I don't recommend taking the wording of this translation seriously ! and by the way here is an example of playing with words: http://www.infidels.org/library/mode...ier/islam.html Enki |
|
07-03-2007, 03:08 AM | #4 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Radio Star, I wouldn't worry too much if the translator wasn't Muslim as long as he was fluent in Arabic. The best English translations I know of are Pickthal and Yusuf Ali. Avoid Khalifa. He's known to have re-written parts of it to make himself look good.
Regarding the traditional canard that you can't really read the Qur'an unless you read it in Arabic my advice would be not to believe it. What they don't tell you is that twenty percent of the Qur'an doesn't even make sense in Arabic! Seriously. It's gibberish. Even the top clerics have no idea what it means. |
07-03-2007, 03:16 AM | #5 | |
Banned
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Australia
Posts: 3,381
|
Mung Bean is correct.
I would suggest Pikthals over all others, unfortunately as Islam has come under scrutiny, translators have liberally inserted their own words to make it look good, even Yusuf Ali is guilty of this. As a comparison. Quote:
Its a bit of a pain in the ass that you can't trust translations from Muslims off the bat, but thats bias for you, i suggest Pikthals, and read a Tafsir such as Ibn Kathir on relevant verses so you can at least compare and make sure it's not whitewashed. |
|
07-03-2007, 03:29 AM | #6 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
And boy does the Qur'an need whitewashing!
In fact Id' advise a thick coat of primer/filler, followed by thorough sanding, undercoat and at least six coats of two pack urethane. Then buff. |
07-03-2007, 05:46 AM | #7 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: gone
Posts: 1,320
|
For easy online reference, I use the Skeptic's annotated Quran.
They also have the Bible and the Book of Mormon. |
07-03-2007, 05:58 AM | #8 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: mombasa,Kenya
Posts: 52
|
Hey Blui,What does the original Arabic say? These slaughter....encounter...and etc, wouldnt they somehow be corrected by the original?
|
07-03-2007, 06:03 AM | #9 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: mombasa,Kenya
Posts: 52
|
Is this for real?Its something i never heard anyone confess!! could you say more on this Blui?
|
07-03-2007, 06:06 AM | #10 |
Obsessed Contributor
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: NJ
Posts: 61,538
|
Maybe it is archaic?
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|