FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > Religion (Closed) > Biblical Criticism & History
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Yesterday at 03:12 PM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 08-28-2012, 02:02 PM   #11
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Texas, U.S.
Posts: 5,844
Default

There are 35 references to 'fornication' in the King James Bible, all of them negative. Fornication being defined as sex outside of marriage.

And since St. Paul argued that it would be better if Christians were not married, like he was, then logically the prescription is clear: Don't have sex until you get married (if you must) and once married, don't have sex with anyone else.

Also, Jesus asserted that having sex with someone who's divorced is the same as committing adultery.
James Brown is offline  
Old 08-28-2012, 02:16 PM   #12
Contributor
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Seattle
Posts: 27,602
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by James Brown View Post
There are 35 references to 'fornication' in the King James Bible, all of them negative. Fornication being defined as sex outside of marriage.

And since St. Paul argued that it would be better if Christians were not married, like he was, then logically the prescription is clear: Don't have sex until you get married (if you must) and once married, don't have sex with anyone else.

Also, Jesus asserted that having sex with someone who's divorced is the same as committing adultery.
i'm not going to look it up, Paul said if you can not hack celibacy get married and have sex. There is nothing in the NT about sex being fundametlly bad. Paul made a erfernce to pagan libertine sex being wrong.

Paul was apocalyptic, he blieved the secoind comming was in his lifetime.

Monogamy is not no sex. I think you are over reaching.
steve_bnk is offline  
Old 08-28-2012, 02:42 PM   #13
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Texas, U.S.
Posts: 5,844
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by steve_bnk View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by James Brown View Post
There are 35 references to 'fornication' in the King James Bible, all of them negative. Fornication being defined as sex outside of marriage.

And since St. Paul argued that it would be better if Christians were not married, like he was, then logically the prescription is clear: Don't have sex until you get married (if you must) and once married, don't have sex with anyone else.

Also, Jesus asserted that having sex with someone who's divorced is the same as committing adultery.
i'm not going to look it up, Paul said if you can not hack celibacy get married and have sex.
Right. In order of his preference, First, stay single. Second, get married.

Quote:
Originally Posted by steve_bnk View Post
There is nothing in the NT about sex being fundametlly bad.
I never said there was. The Song of Solomon passages make that clear. Jehovah told Adam and Eve to increase and multiply.

Quote:
Originally Posted by steve_bnk View Post
Monogamy is not no sex.
I never said it was.
James Brown is offline  
Old 08-28-2012, 04:16 PM   #14
Moderator - Evolution/Creation
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: USA
Posts: 5,710
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by premjan View Post
Who preached abstinence? The Ramayana, Koran and Bible are not especially concerned with abstinence.
Right. Abrahamic religions certainly do not preach abstinence - quite the opposite in fact. What they do preach is no sex outside of marriage.
J842P is offline  
Old 08-28-2012, 04:56 PM   #15
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Texas
Posts: 5,172
Default

I never liked Paul. Something about his writing and life just screams nutcase in total denial.
Zeluvia is offline  
Old 08-28-2012, 05:00 PM   #16
Contributor
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Seattle
Posts: 27,602
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Zeluvia View Post
Paul was gay, and terribly conflicted about it too....


Cerrtainly a fair question. No reasonn why a preacher 2000 years ago was less likely to be in the closet than a preacher today.
steve_bnk is offline  
Old 08-29-2012, 06:43 AM   #17
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: India
Posts: 6,977
Default

I think sex in holy books is also a matter of their times. Christianity introduced prudery about sex and sexual organs and so modern Europeans are unused to associating holy books with erotica and their colonies picked up the habit.
hinduwoman is offline  
Old 08-29-2012, 06:43 AM   #18
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Texas, U.S.
Posts: 5,844
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by James Brown View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by steve_bnk View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by James Brown View Post
There are 35 references to 'fornication' in the King James Bible, all of them negative. Fornication being defined as sex outside of marriage.

And since St. Paul argued that it would be better if Christians were not married, like he was, then logically the prescription is clear: Don't have sex until you get married (if you must) and once married, don't have sex with anyone else.

Also, Jesus asserted that having sex with someone who's divorced is the same as committing adultery.
i'm not going to look it up, Paul said if you can not hack celibacy get married and have sex.
Right. In order of his preference, First, stay single. Second, get married.

Quote:
Originally Posted by steve_bnk View Post
There is nothing in the NT about sex being fundametlly bad.
I never said there was. The Song of Solomon passages make that clear. Jehovah told Adam and Eve to increase and multiply.

Quote:
Originally Posted by steve_bnk View Post
Monogamy is not no sex.
I never said it was.
Sheesh. You'd think I could remember that Song of Solomon and Genesis are not in the NT.

Sorry, Steve. I still agree with you that the NT does not proscribe against sex per se, but I gave crappy examples.
James Brown is offline  
Old 08-29-2012, 06:49 AM   #19
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: India
Posts: 6,977
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by steve_bnk View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Zeluvia View Post
Paul was gay, and terribly conflicted about it too....


Cerrtainly a fair question. No reasonn why a preacher 2000 years ago was less likely to be in the closet than a preacher today.
It simply could be he was afraid of the power women have through sex; maybe he liked sex a little too much himself and so denied it just to have control.
hinduwoman is offline  
Old 08-30-2012, 12:49 AM   #20
Contributor
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Los Angeles area
Posts: 40,549
Default

moved from ABR.
Toto is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:34 AM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.