Freethought & Rationalism ArchiveThe archives are read only. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
03-21-2007, 05:49 PM | #1 | |
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 1,289
|
discussion on posting styles, etc split from mythicist/historicist debate
Quote:
If it's one you belong to, let alone administer or speak for --- well, as Samuel Goldwyn said... JG |
|
03-21-2007, 11:56 PM | #2 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: ""
Posts: 3,863
|
Quote:
Your sarcasm and arrogance far outweighs your knowledge and you are often a pain in the unmentionable than a resource though you are both. You have made yourself an unceasing fountain of questions, jibes, sarcastic remarks and irrelevancies. But our tolerance is high and you and praexus are both welcome to play in spite of your failings. |
|
03-22-2007, 06:37 AM | #3 | |
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 1,289
|
Quote:
Jeffrey Gibson |
|
03-22-2007, 07:22 AM | #4 | ||
Veteran Member
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: ""
Posts: 3,863
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
||
03-22-2007, 07:40 AM | #5 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: ""
Posts: 3,863
|
I am impressed by you HJ guys. I am glad to see that you megabrain scholars can unbury yourselves and take time off the mountaineous volumes of commentaries written by HJ scholars to comment on the relationship the adjectives employed by some faceless amateur on the net has on the environment, and on Hell.
You are alright after all. |
03-22-2007, 11:40 PM | #6 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: none
Posts: 9,879
|
|
03-23-2007, 02:53 AM | #7 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: ""
Posts: 3,863
|
Chris, this must be so easy for you. Just sit back and call me delusional and present no evidence that contradicts my claims. It must be very easy to be you.
You dont know what I believe so dont flatter yourself. |
03-23-2007, 04:50 AM | #8 | |
Banned
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Queens, NY
Posts: 2,293
|
Quote:
Since you have defacto linked me with the above lists of posting problems you have a responsibility to delineate what you consider specifically my 'failings'. Although that is not really necessary if the above comments were not meant to apply to me and you had some other unmentioned concerns. So if that list above is not applicable please make the necessary and proper specific delinkages, for forum decorum. If you believe it is applicable then you might give some examples from my postings. Send the specifics to me privately if you like. Thanks. Shalom, Steven |
|
03-23-2007, 07:11 AM | #9 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: none
Posts: 9,879
|
Oh yeah, this is definitely gone awry. We have to prevent evidence to contradict your claims? Isn't that a little like a Christians saying prove God doesn't exist? In fact, they're the same. You've been reduced to logical fallacies to keep your position. Why don't YOU present evidence that scholars are "shaking in their boots". Otherwise you're just another passerby angry at the establishment and dreaming up conspiracy theories.
|
03-23-2007, 07:23 AM | #10 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: ""
Posts: 3,863
|
Quote:
In any event, I apologize and withdraw my remarks. |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|