FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > Religion (Closed) > Biblical Criticism & History
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Yesterday at 03:12 PM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 03-21-2007, 05:49 PM   #1
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 1,289
Default discussion on posting styles, etc split from mythicist/historicist debate

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ted Hoffman View Post
Even Gibson recently made a mistake regarding archons. It doesnt mean Gibson has no good ideas. It just means he is fallible and we accepted him back into the fold.
How utterly generous of you. But who are among this "we" you speak of who have "accepted me back"? If his last message to me is an indication of anything, t certainly doesn't include Earl. And what "fold" is this into whose bosom, and through the graciousness of its members, I have, undeserving as I am, been permitted to return?

If it's one you belong to, let alone administer or speak for --- well, as Samuel Goldwyn said...

JG
jgibson000 is offline  
Old 03-21-2007, 11:56 PM   #2
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: ""
Posts: 3,863
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jgibson000 View Post
How utterly generous of you. But who are among this "we" you speak of who have "accepted me back"? If his last message to me is an indication of anything, t certainly doesn't include Earl. And what "fold" is this into whose bosom, and through the graciousness of its members, I have, undeserving as I am, been permitted to return?

If it's one you belong to, let alone administer or speak for --- well, as Samuel Goldwyn said...

JG
The fold is BC&H. For someone with your magnitude of arrogance whose mainstay is portraying other posters as incompetent and not worthy of being listened to, for someone who has derailed several threads on irrelevant matters, we should have started ignoring you. But we do not.
Your sarcasm and arrogance far outweighs your knowledge and you are often a pain in the unmentionable than a resource though you are both. You have made yourself an unceasing fountain of questions, jibes, sarcastic remarks and irrelevancies.
But our tolerance is high and you and praexus are both welcome to play in spite of your failings.
Ted Hoffman is offline  
Old 03-22-2007, 06:37 AM   #3
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 1,289
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ted Hoffman View Post
The fold is BC&H. For someone with your magnitude of arrogance whose mainstay is portraying other posters as incompetent and not worthy of being listened to, for someone who has derailed several threads on irrelevant matters,

Care to specify which ones?

we should have started ignoring you. But we do not.

Your sarcasm and arrogance far outweighs your knowledge and you are often a pain in the unmentionable than a resource though you are both. You have made yourself an unceasing fountain of questions, jibes, sarcastic remarks and irrelevancies.

But our tolerance is high and you and praexus are both welcome to play in spite of your failings.[emphasis mine]
Wow. Speaking of arrogance ... When were you assigned by the moderators (or for that matter any list member) the role of official spokesperson and gatekeeper for the forum?

Jeffrey Gibson
jgibson000 is offline  
Old 03-22-2007, 07:22 AM   #4
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: ""
Posts: 3,863
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by JGibson
Care to specify which ones?
This is a perfect example of a good thread that is invaded and hijacked by one intent on derailing it or at best grinding it to a halt with inane quibbles and tangential issues. You assiduously strived to stop Jay from furthering the debate on the thread. In several threads, the mods have had to step in to ask you exactly why you are badgering someone about a certain question that is either blindingly clear or irrelevant. You ask for secondary sources, then for primary sources, then drag out Lexicons or paste huge acres of texts with Greek from BDAG, then you will ask someone to write to a certain scholar and ask him if X is what he actually means when he writes Y. Then you will ask a question. Then it will be answered. Then you will say it is a response but not an answer. Then you will say he never understood the question anyway. And on and on.
Quote:
Originally Posted by JGibson
When were you assigned by the moderators (or for that matter any list member) the role of official spokesperson and gatekeeper for the forum?
Actually, I am volunteering. I like doing pro bono stuff. Nice huh?
Ted Hoffman is offline  
Old 03-22-2007, 07:40 AM   #5
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: ""
Posts: 3,863
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by S.C.Carlson View Post
Hell must have frozen over.
I am impressed by you HJ guys. I am glad to see that you megabrain scholars can unbury yourselves and take time off the mountaineous volumes of commentaries written by HJ scholars to comment on the relationship the adjectives employed by some faceless amateur on the net has on the environment, and on Hell.
You are alright after all.
Ted Hoffman is offline  
Old 03-22-2007, 11:40 PM   #6
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: none
Posts: 9,879
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ted Hoffman View Post
Yep. Quaking in their pants is more like it.
If you believe that, you're more deluded than I thought.
Chris Weimer is offline  
Old 03-23-2007, 02:53 AM   #7
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: ""
Posts: 3,863
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chris Weimer View Post
If you believe that, you're more deluded than I thought.
Chris, this must be so easy for you. Just sit back and call me delusional and present no evidence that contradicts my claims. It must be very easy to be you.
You dont know what I believe so dont flatter yourself.
Ted Hoffman is offline  
Old 03-23-2007, 04:50 AM   #8
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Queens, NY
Posts: 2,293
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ted Hoffman
arrogance ... portraying other posters as incompetent .. derailed several threads ... sarcasm and arrogance ... pain in the unmentionable .. unceasing fountain of questions, jibes, sarcastic remarks and irrelevancies. .. you and praexus are both welcome to play in spite of your failings.
Hi Ted,

Since you have defacto linked me with the above lists of posting problems you have a responsibility to delineate what you consider specifically my 'failings'. Although that is not really necessary if the above comments were not meant to apply to me and you had some other unmentioned concerns.

So if that list above is not applicable please make the necessary and proper specific delinkages, for forum decorum. If you believe it is applicable then you might give some examples from my postings. Send the specifics to me privately if you like.

Thanks.

Shalom,
Steven
Steven Avery is offline  
Old 03-23-2007, 07:11 AM   #9
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: none
Posts: 9,879
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ted Hoffman View Post
Chris, this must be so easy for you. Just sit back and call me delusional and present no evidence that contradicts my claims. It must be very easy to be you.
You dont know what I believe so dont flatter yourself.
Oh yeah, this is definitely gone awry. We have to prevent evidence to contradict your claims? Isn't that a little like a Christians saying prove God doesn't exist? In fact, they're the same. You've been reduced to logical fallacies to keep your position. Why don't YOU present evidence that scholars are "shaking in their boots". Otherwise you're just another passerby angry at the establishment and dreaming up conspiracy theories.
Chris Weimer is offline  
Old 03-23-2007, 07:23 AM   #10
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: ""
Posts: 3,863
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by praxeus View Post
Hi Ted,

Since you have defacto linked me with the above lists of posting problems you have a responsibility to delineate what you consider specifically my 'failings'. Although that is not really necessary if the above comments were not meant to apply to me and you had some other unmentioned concerns.

So if that list above is not applicable please make the necessary and proper specific delinkages, for forum decorum. If you believe it is applicable then you might give some examples from my postings. Send the specifics to me privately if you like.

Thanks.

Shalom,
Steven
Actually, I have never debated you and I really dont personally feel you have caused any infraction that I would bother to look up. But your discussions with spin reveal certain um - issues.
In any event, I apologize and withdraw my remarks.
Ted Hoffman is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 03:58 AM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.