FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > Religion (Closed) > Biblical Criticism & History
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Yesterday at 03:12 PM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 07-18-2012, 05:53 PM   #221
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Philadelphia, PA
Posts: 3,387
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by DCHindley View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Duke Leto View Post

Hegesippus is supposedly non-extant.
You are thinking of the 2nd century writer Hegesippus who had also written five books of Recollections, which may have attempted to place early Christian figures in the context of Josephus' War and Antiquities. You are correct that this has perished except for citations in Church fathers.
Yeah, I'm pretty sure Stephan means both of them. He thinks they're the same author. Almost his entire argument is based on quotations of the earlier Hegesippus in Clement and Epiphanus. Since Clement attributes the quote to Josephus that proves in Stephan's untidy little mind that Josephus is Hegesippus and the parts of Hasmonean and Herodean history that offend him can be re-written as he sees fit.
Duke Leto is offline  
Old 07-18-2012, 06:07 PM   #222
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Philadelphia, PA
Posts: 3,387
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by stephan huller View Post
Once that is secured, the admission of 'synergoi' working on at least some of the Josephan corpus becomes an ominous development. Was this Josephus 'confessing' to their existence or - as I and many others would suppose - the second,. third or fourth century redactor of the mateiral attempting to put these words in Josephus's mouth to justify the newly created forgery?
Who are these people? It'd be interesting to see the question and answer session where Dr. Cohen and a bevy of other experts in the area lay into you if you could actually get to a present a paper on this at an academic conference.

What you've laid out in this thread pretty much amounts to a conspiracy theory. A shadowy cabal of unknown persons for reasons you refuse to adequately explain are pulling the wool over the eyes of the credulous sheeple.
Duke Leto is offline  
Old 07-18-2012, 06:21 PM   #223
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: seattle, wa
Posts: 9,337
Default

Have you actually read Leemings translation yet? It is done side by side with the familiar Greek.
stephan huller is offline  
Old 07-18-2012, 06:23 PM   #224
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: seattle, wa
Posts: 9,337
Default

Are you asking me who in scholarship had suggested the synergoi might have written after Josephus's death or without his permission?
stephan huller is offline  
Old 07-18-2012, 06:27 PM   #225
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: seattle, wa
Posts: 9,337
Default

Thackeray for one argues for a second century dating for Antiquities. Is there a magic number to get you to admit you don't know wtf you are talking about
stephan huller is offline  
Old 07-18-2012, 06:28 PM   #226
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Philadelphia, PA
Posts: 3,387
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by stephan huller View Post
Are you asking me who in scholarship had suggested the synergoi might have written after Josephus's death or without his permission?
That would be a good start, but then a list of people who accept the idea as proven apart from you would be good. And these would need to be actual people not just different anonymous user names you create to comment on your own blog.
Duke Leto is offline  
Old 07-18-2012, 06:38 PM   #227
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: seattle, wa
Posts: 9,337
Default

The other thing to remember also is that most everyone ignores Clement's clear reference of 'Flavius Josephus' having written a 'History of the Jews' in the second century. Whether or not you or anyone 'agrees' with the hypothesis there is enough between Cohen's theory and Thackeray's established positions to put forward this explanation. It is not nearly as ridiculous as assuming that Clement references 147 CE in the middle of his discussion of 'Flavius Josephus' and his 'History of the Jews' because it was the year Clement was born. That was your childish interpretation which is a non-starter as there is no room for self-reference in the section.
stephan huller is offline  
Old 07-18-2012, 06:39 PM   #228
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: seattle, wa
Posts: 9,337
Default

Quote:
user names you create to comment on your own blog.
Pardon me. Are you fucking crazy? First of all I rarely have comments at my blog and those that appear there are from people you can follow back to their place of origin.
stephan huller is offline  
Old 07-18-2012, 06:42 PM   #229
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: seattle, wa
Posts: 9,337
Default

Here is the summary from the Google analytics page at this very minute:

Pageviews today
9
Pageviews yesterday
258
Pageviews last month
10,085
Pageviews all time history
340,935
Don't track your own pageviews
stephan huller is offline  
Old 07-18-2012, 06:45 PM   #230
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: seattle, wa
Posts: 9,337
Default

Here is the breakdown by place of origin:


United States
159
Germany
30
United Kingdom
20
Sweden
10
Portugal
7
Poland
4
Canada
2
China
2
Greece
2
Croatia
2

I don't think it lists places where only a single visitor comes from that place
stephan huller is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:06 AM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.