Freethought & Rationalism Archive

deadman_932 · 08-01-2007, 05:48 AM

Creo Blinkers™, God Goggles™ and the special tinfoil helmet are must-haves for this season's fashionable Creationut.

Damn you, Pappy and Mung, you're using totally unfair tactics against Dave -- like logic and reason.

I wonder if he'll whip out the ol' "Ill be basking in heaven while I watch you writhing in HELL!" again today. Yep, Davey, it works with SOME of the kiddies you try to brainwash, so it MUST work against adults, too, eh? *points and laughs*

08-01-2007, 06:12 AM

Well If Davey's gonna try freaking us with his gloating about hell I reckon we should point out that Allah is gonna be mighty pissed with him.
Shit Dave, have you read the Qur'an? Hell's even worse than you think it is.
Better say your shahada quick smart, boyo. Never know when yer time's up.

Faid · 08-01-2007, 06:44 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Vicious Love

Quote:

Originally Posted by afdave

And I am equally astonished that modern educated people DON'T think such a thing could happen, given the abundance of evidence for it. You have not done much reading of creationist materials, have you?

I agree. Clearly nothing short of an omnipotent god could conceal a 1-2 mile thick global sedimentary layer. The plain fact that the flood sediment is utterly imperceptible is overwhelming evidence of a deceitful god.

:thumbs: :notworthy:

Faid · 08-01-2007, 07:05 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by afdave

Maybe you guys should go get Dean Anderson to come back and try to present your "Smyth-was-chasing-ghosts" arguments. You guys have yet to explain your argument convincingly.

As for Flood deposits in Egypt, here you go ...

http://www.digitalegypt.ucl.ac.uk/geo/geology.html

Limestone and sandstone.

Flood deposits.

Is that what you were looking for?

Say WHAT?

:rolling:

How does limestone form again, davey?

Also:

http://mathworld.wolfram.com/SlantHeight.html

Now that you are familliar with the terms, oh mighty lecturer, start "debunking the nonsense". IF you can. Or kindly refrain from arrogant remarks like the ones above, that only make you look sillier, and try to learn a thing or two. About ANYTHING.

<edit> Whoops, seems deadman and OA and Johnny Sceptic caught your blooper already. Oh well.

Pappy Jack · 08-01-2007, 09:56 AM

Hmmm, Dave seems to have found a new drum to bang at http://www.iidb.org/vbb/showthread.php?t=216026 where he is busy 'proving' that Richard Leakey reconstructed an early hominid skull inaccurately based on the knowledge existing at the time of reconstruction. This in some way reveals Dr Leakey's 'bias' and therefore proves the YEC model (Dave doesn't actually say that it proves the YEC model in so many words, but I think that is the general direction he is headed with this). He must still be looking for that evidence of the 1-2 mile Flud sediment and got distracted......:devil1:

Calilasseia · 08-01-2007, 10:14 AM

So instead of heading off to the thread that I specifically provided for him to make his case for the "worldwide flood deposit" complete with a handy list of geological features to start him off, he's launched a thread in which he's spinning the "scientists make shit up" libel?

Doesn't surprise me, sadly.

Dave Hawkins · 08-01-2007, 10:27 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by deadman_932

From your link:
"A layer of limestone covers most of the surface of modern Egypt.

Beneath this lies a bed of sandstone, and this earlier sandstone is the surface rock in Nubia and southern Upper Egypt, as far north as the area between Edfu and Luxor."

So that limestone bed overlaying the sandstone in Nubia got eroded...how? In 4500 years? It's hard enough to be used for monuments and it's in the desert.

And why don't those layers cover all of egypt entirely if it was laid down by a global flood? And how did Limestone containing sea floor fossils such as those found in Egytian stone...get deposited in a global flood with no other modern animals? Foolish, foolish creationists.

Probably high energy, catastrophic water flow. Have you learned nothing from all my discussions of the Palouse Canyon and the English Channel?

deadman_932 · 08-01-2007, 10:36 AM

I have learned that you know shit about geology, Dave, that is what I learned -- and it's evidenced in your last post.

deadman_932 · 08-01-2007, 10:37 AM

throwing out terms as if you KNOW what they mean is laughable...you're spouting jargon like a total amateur...high-energy water flows like the palouse leave defined, precise kinds of traces, Mr. Geology. Show me those braided channels in Nubia, please.

Occam's Aftershave · 08-01-2007, 10:49 AM

Dave, it's a simple question:

How does limestone form?

Can you explain in your own words so we can tell if you understand?

Thread Tools	Search this Thread
Show Printable Version	Search this Thread: Advanced Search

08-01-2007, 05:48 AM	#741
deadman_932 Veteran Member Join Date: Jun 2007 Location: Altadena, California Posts: 3,271	Creo Blinkers™, God Goggles™ and the special tinfoil helmet are must-haves for this season's fashionable Creationut. Damn you, Pappy and Mung, you're using totally unfair tactics against Dave -- like logic and reason. I wonder if he'll whip out the ol' "Ill be basking in heaven while I watch you writhing in HELL!" again today. Yep, Davey, it works with SOME of the kiddies you try to brainwash, so it MUST work against adults, too, eh? points and laughs

08-01-2007, 06:12 AM	#742
mung bean Guest Posts: n/a	Well If Davey's gonna try freaking us with his gloating about hell I reckon we should point out that Allah is gonna be mighty pissed with him. Shit Dave, have you read the Qur'an? Hell's even worse than you think it is. Better say your shahada quick smart, boyo. Never know when yer time's up.

08-01-2007, 09:56 AM	#745
Pappy Jack Senior Member Join Date: Jun 2007 Location: French Pyrenees Posts: 649	Hmmm, Dave seems to have found a new drum to bang at http://www.iidb.org/vbb/showthread.php?t=216026 where he is busy 'proving' that Richard Leakey reconstructed an early hominid skull inaccurately based on the knowledge existing at the time of reconstruction. This in some way reveals Dr Leakey's 'bias' and therefore proves the YEC model (Dave doesn't actually say that it proves the YEC model in so many words, but I think that is the general direction he is headed with this). He must still be looking for that evidence of the 1-2 mile Flud sediment and got distracted......:devil1:

08-01-2007, 10:14 AM	#746
Calilasseia Veteran Member Join Date: Jun 2007 Location: Near Liverpool, UK Posts: 1,072	So instead of heading off to the thread that I specifically provided for him to make his case for the "worldwide flood deposit" complete with a handy list of geological features to start him off, he's launched a thread in which he's spinning the "scientists make shit up" libel? Doesn't surprise me, sadly.

08-01-2007, 10:36 AM	#748
deadman_932 Veteran Member Join Date: Jun 2007 Location: Altadena, California Posts: 3,271	I have learned that you know shit about geology, Dave, that is what I learned -- and it's evidenced in your last post.

08-01-2007, 10:37 AM	#749
deadman_932 Veteran Member Join Date: Jun 2007 Location: Altadena, California Posts: 3,271	throwing out terms as if you KNOW what they mean is laughable...you're spouting jargon like a total amateur...high-energy water flows like the palouse leave defined, precise kinds of traces, Mr. Geology. Show me those braided channels in Nubia, please.

08-01-2007, 10:49 AM	#750
Occam's Aftershave Veteran Member Join Date: Jun 2002 Location: California Posts: 2,215	Dave, it's a simple question: How does limestone form? Can you explain in your own words so we can tell if you understand?

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.