Freethought & Rationalism ArchiveThe archives are read only. |
04-18-2005, 01:15 PM | #1 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Hawaii
Posts: 6,629
|
God's gender
As more and more Christians seem to regard god as being genderless, why couldn't god have sent his only begotten daughter, with or without his only begotten son, to save mankind? Why the favoritism?
|
04-18-2005, 01:28 PM | #2 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: none
Posts: 9,879
|
Because in order to keep the Holy Trinity from Egypt, they needed a son (Horus) to make it complete.
|
04-18-2005, 03:34 PM | #3 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Bli Bli
Posts: 3,135
|
Quote:
And more curiously in John chapt 1 the "word" of God seems to have male and female qualities. The genders are mixed up between the verbs and nouns. |
|
04-18-2005, 04:25 PM | #4 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: USA
Posts: 562
|
I'd say it was rather that Jesus was later adopted by Christians as part of the Triune God, rather than the other way around. Not to mention the fact that late Judaism was pretty male-dominated.
|
04-18-2005, 04:29 PM | #5 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: none
Posts: 9,879
|
But Zeichman, the Trinity existed before the Triune God, God the Father, Jesus the Son, Mary the Mother (possibly the Holy Spirit later took the place of Mary). Yes, this was a development after the initial onset of what appears to be Jesus the Preacher talking about God the Father, but remember, Jesus only became divine after the vote. The earliest Christians were still split on whether or not Jesus was divine, and I doubt the earliest held that to be so.
|
04-18-2005, 05:24 PM | #6 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: USA
Posts: 562
|
Quote:
Though I am a Trinitarian Christian, I certainly don't think the proto-orthodox Pauline Christians were trinitarian. If nothing else, I think he, along with many of his later supporters, were binitarian: The Father and Son were equal and co-eternal. The Holy Spirit seems to largely be an afterthought, given its usage in the Hebrew Bible does not put forth the idea that it is a separate person of God. (51st Psalm, for example) Even the use of the Trinitarian formula in Matthew doesn't imply that the author thought of them as all equal. |
|
04-18-2005, 05:46 PM | #7 | |
Banned
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Alberta
Posts: 11,885
|
Quote:
Oh, and "to save mankind" is wishful thinking. |
|
04-18-2005, 07:50 PM | #8 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: none
Posts: 9,879
|
Quote:
|
|
04-19-2005, 06:28 AM | #9 |
Contributor
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: London UK
Posts: 16,024
|
Message (paraphrase) Genesis "Reflecting God's Nature He Created them male and female"
Jung argued that when the Catholic Church made Mary Mother of God (in the 1830's?) the Trinity then became a Quaternity. Was that an infallible proclamation? |
04-19-2005, 06:56 AM | #10 | |
Banned
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Alberta
Posts: 11,885
|
Quote:
Since there is a relationship between these two minds the HS was introduced as messenger between these two minds who is under the guidance of Mary for that very reason = Mary our Mediatrix of all graces. Jung was just wrong but Bobby Jones style warrior drilled minds would never know the difference. When these two minds become one in the Hypostatic Union the dove will descent, as it must, because it is redundant after that (unless it just left some droppings on the Bobby Jones style believer). |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|