FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > Religion (Closed) > Biblical Criticism & History
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Yesterday at 03:12 PM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 11-21-2004, 01:19 AM   #1
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: ""
Posts: 3,863
Default What constituted "a City" in 1st century Galilee?

I remember reading Fredricksen giving the population of the pharisees and arguing why some polemics against them did not make sense.

From my understanding, Josephus mentioned in his writings 240 cities and villages, least of which had around 15,000 residents, IIRC (some say between 8000 and 12000 residents). Of course, Nazareth isn't among the cities Josephus mentions and critics will claim that this is not remarkable since Josephus also fails to mention many other cities.

And this streak of failure to mention the city from which the lord hailed from is maintained by Paul, by the Talmud and by the Old Testament.

I don't need to talk about Archaological evidence for Nazareth from Jonathan Reed's work and the Franciscan fathers. What we do know is that Luke 2.3 and 4, Matthew 2.22,23 and Luke 2.39,40 refer to Nazareth as a city.

Now, is there anywhere I can get a working and authoritative definition - population wise and perhaps in terms of infrastructure and administrative make-up - of what "a city" could have meant in first century Galilee?

Thanks

edited to remove reference to Decapolis
Ted Hoffman is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:56 AM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.