Freethought & Rationalism ArchiveThe archives are read only. |
07-13-2005, 04:55 PM | #1 |
Banned
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Arizona
Posts: 20,817
|
Why only 144,000?
For the benefit of clocpw2...
The Jehovah's Witnesses teach that there will basically three ways that a person can achieve "salvation". 1. Survive Armageddon, then pass the final judgement and live forever on earth as a human being. 2. Die prior to Armageddon, be resurrected, then pass the final judgement and live forever on earth as a human being. 3. You are of the annointed. Before Armageddon comes, you must die, but are resurrected to rule with Jesus in heaven. There will be exactly 144,000 of these folks. Most other Christian religions talk of rising to heaven, with no limit on the number. Why the incongruity? If you google "Jehovah's Witnesses 144000" you will get quite a few hits on articles discussing this. Here is my personal therory... Numerology. I am not going to go into any real detail, but consider this. There were... 12 apostles. 12 tribes of Israel 12 signs of the zodiac... what!? That's right. The bible is filled with pagan references and since 144,000 is a multiple of both 12 and 1000, both significant numbers in the bible, it is no accident that the number of those going to heaven is 144,000. The Witnesses go into some detail and even to a degree acknowledge the numerology, but that is not important. What is important is the origin of the numerology. What the Witnesses do not teach is that the Israelites practiced an animistic religion before settling in the land of Canaan. Other evidence of animism in the OT? The tree of life. The tree of knowledge. The burning bush. Mount Sinai. Moses' magic staff. Mana from heaven. There are many. I would recommend doing some research on animism. Do a little more research and you will find some very cool stuff specifically related to the semite people. I particularly like the Myth of Lilith. Then take into consideration the taboo of masturbation and you will see where this nonsense comes from. The question a freethinking Jehovah's Witness should ask themselves is... why would Jehovah use two different forms of religion for his people? Why didn't he, when he forged his covenant with Abraham, establish one right way to worship and honor him? Why wait until the Israelites were wandering around in the wilderness before handing down his Law Covenant? Hell, why didn't he do this after the Flood and save some time and suffering? |
07-13-2005, 05:43 PM | #2 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: May 2005
Location: On an icefloe off the atlantic coast of Canada
Posts: 1,095
|
A freethinking Jehovah ' s witness is an oxymoron .
A J.W. must embrace the whole doctrine as dictated by the elders in the watchtower office in NYC or he or she is out and shunned by family and friends , and since they are discouraged from socializing outside their faith , one can imagine the distress of those who dare disagree with the hierarchy . Compared to them the high clergy of the roman catholic church are a bunch of choir boys . |
07-13-2005, 07:23 PM | #3 | |||||
Veteran Member
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: British Columbia
Posts: 1,027
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
|||||
07-13-2005, 07:37 PM | #4 |
Banned
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Arizona
Posts: 20,817
|
Sodium,
Thanks for your reply, but... my question was pretty much rhetorical. I know the answer to my own question, well... what I mean is... I know the JW answer to the question. Very well even. I am wondering where you got your information from. One nit-pick... The "new Jerusalem" is God's new kingdom here on earth, with Jesus and the 144,000 as the rulers. Jesus as king. This blending of heaven and earth is not really very well explained. |
07-13-2005, 08:11 PM | #5 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Colorado
Posts: 1,037
|
A question I have is does anyone know of any justification for the JW's usage of 607 BC for the end of the Kingdom of Judah?
Other than wanting to get 1914 after adding the 2520 years, of course. I have been talking to a JW for a few weeks, and he apparently knows next to nothing about the background to his beliefs. |
07-13-2005, 08:38 PM | #6 | ||||
Veteran Member
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: British Columbia
Posts: 1,027
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
||||
07-14-2005, 02:45 AM | #7 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Birmingham UK
Posts: 4,876
|
Quote:
Notes a/ the 3rd year of Jehoiakim (reigned from 609 BC) could be anywhere from 607 to 605 BC. b/ there are serious problems with reconciling the statements in the beginning of Daniel with other evidence Biblical and non-Biblical. Andrew Criddle |
|
07-14-2005, 05:03 AM | #8 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Colorado
Posts: 1,037
|
Thanks, Andrew. At least there is something. The Watchtower.org site has exactly one reference to 607 BC, and it is just a statement that this is when it occurred.
Quote:
|
|
07-14-2005, 05:24 AM | #9 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: May 2005
Location: USA
Posts: 8,254
|
Quote:
What else is there to do in the desert but to hand down covenants?? Why not after the Flood? Can you imagine the mess after the flood? Nobody was in the mood for covenants after all the cleaning and stuff. Now,in the desert Jehova had a captive audience... Timing! |
|
07-14-2005, 07:59 AM | #10 | |
Banned
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Arizona
Posts: 20,817
|
Quote:
That the JW you are talking to about it doesn't know anything is typical. Their education process is basically rote memorization and parroting what they hear at the Ministry School. Every now and then, you will find one that can speak with some degree of actual knowledge, but since the 80's... they have de-emphasized their numerology. They held on to it for the longest time. The last thing was the "this generation will not pass". The end of times was supposed to have started in 1914, the same year my grandmother was born. She died in 95 at the age of 82. So it took until the 90's before they were capable of letting it completely go. It has been so long since I "studied" that no doubt my undertsanding has become out of date. Seems rather odd that, what I know from 25 years ago, taught to me by God's organization on earth, is useless now-a-days. LOL One would think it would be useful forever. |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|