FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > Religion (Closed) > Biblical Criticism & History
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Yesterday at 03:12 PM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 01-15-2008, 12:25 PM   #171
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Florida
Posts: 19,796
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Johnny Skeptic
It is an absurd notion that a loving God would be concerned with dirt. All that land is is dirt. A loving God would concerned with a person's heart, not where they live.
Quote:
Originally Posted by arnoldo
It's not absurd if you consider that in order for the Jewish people to survive they needed a homeland for at least for enought time to establish they're cultural and religous identity until they were dispersed into all the nations when Jerusalem (and their temple) was destroyed by the Romans in 70.
So are you saying that you believe in the separation of church and state in the U.S., but not in Israel?

I challenge you to produce credible evidence that the partition of Palestine in 1948 would not have occured without God's help. The Jews were only able to estalish a Jewish state in 1948 because they had military help from other countries.

The partition of Palestine in 1948 WAS NOT a fulfillment of Bible prophecy. God promised to give ALL of the land of ancient Canaan to Abraham and his descendants. Today, Jews do not occupy ALL of the land of ancient Canaan.

Regarding the Old Testament claim that God's protection of Jews was conditional upon good behavior, what about Jewish babies? Was it fair for Jewish babies to have to suffer because of the disobedience of their parents?

Was it fair for God to force animals to kill each other after Adam and Eve at the forbidden fruit?
Johnny Skeptic is offline  
Old 01-15-2008, 12:28 PM   #172
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Florida
Posts: 19,796
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by arnoldo
It's not absurd if you consider that in order for the Jewish people to survive they needed a homeland for at least for enought time to establish they're cultural and religous identity.
But everyone needs to survive, not just Jews. What about the Canaanites who the Jews stole Canaan from? Why should Jews have gotten preferential treatment from God? Why did God choose the Jews to be his chosen people? Why did God turn his back on the rest of the people in the world during Old Testament times?
Johnny Skeptic is offline  
Old 01-15-2008, 12:30 PM   #173
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: The temple of Isis at Memphis
Posts: 1,484
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by arnoldo View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Johnny Skeptic View Post
It is an absurd notion that a loving God would be concerned with dirt. All that land is is dirt. A loving God would concerned with a person's heart, not where they live. .
It's not absurd if you consider that in order for the Jewish people to survive they needed a homeland for at least for enought time to establish they're cultural and religous identity
Nonsense. Are you saying that the Hebrew people had no culture or religious identity during the time of Joseph, vizier to the Pharaoh?

Quote:
Also you need to take into consideration that a stable homeland was needed in order for God's Word to be written and recorderd accurately throughout the millenium
Why? If it's a divine book, then God is guaranteeing its accuracy regardless of the circumstances under which it is written. It could be written while riding on the back of a speeding camel fleeing from thieves.

Moreover, the Hebrews didn't have a stable homeland for most of their history, yet the OT books got written anyhow. So your initial presumption doesn't hold much water.

Quote:
can be written as well as for all of the prophets to be born and most importantly to establish the geneology for the Messiah.
Again, why?
Sheshonq is offline  
Old 01-15-2008, 01:38 PM   #174
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Florida
Posts: 19,796
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by arnoldo
Also, you need to take into consideration that a stable homeland was needed in order for God's Word to be written and recorderd accurately throughout the millenium.
That is false. God had no need of depending upon puny humans to write the Bible. If he exists, he would have written it himself. More importantly, he would have DISTRIBUTED it himself instead of mimicking the way that news about him would have been spread if he did not exist, and allowing millions of people to die without hearing the Gospel message.

If Old Testament Jews invented the God of the Bible, that explains why news of the God of the Bible started in a single place instead of simultaneously all over the world. False religions by necessity must start in only one place. If a God existed who wanted to communicate with humans partly in tangible ways, it is logical to assume that he would start simultaneously start a religions all over the world at the same time. If instead of one only begotten Son of God there had been one thousand only begotten sons of God who lived in many parts of the world at the same time, and performed many miracles, and rose from the dead on the same day, and appeared to hundreds of people, the Christian church would surely be much larger than it is today.

Of course, no false religion could ever produce evidence like that.
Johnny Skeptic is offline  
Old 01-15-2008, 02:01 PM   #175
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: georgia
Posts: 2,726
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sheshonq View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by sugarhitman View Post

So are you saying that Britain did not prevent Jewish immigration?
I am saying that you don't know what the Balfour declaration was.

I'm also saying that you don't have a clue as to the status of Jewish immigration before, or after, Balfour.

Finally, I'm saying that your understanding of world history is probably worse than your understanding of science -- which is saying quite a lot, actually.


Uh, no.

Quote:
Dont embarrass yourself, not all on this forum is ignorant of this historical fact. :wave:
I can guarantee you that I know far more about this than you do. If anyone embarrasses himself in this forum, it won't be me.



So you are saying that Israel did not encounter resistence from Britian, and the Arabs? Our discussion is not about the Balfour declaration. It is about whether the Restoration of Israel is a self- fulfilling prophecy or not. A self-fulfilling prophecy is one in which you control the events and encounter little or no resistence. The Jews encountered much resistence, this is very well known, and your attempts to deny this is just that....DENIAL. And so what if Israel had some sympathy from other countries and people. God works this way as well. Remember He fortold in Isaiah that he would raise up Cyrus to prepare the way for the restoration of Israel. There is more than one way for God to accomplish his goals.....and it does not always include divine miracles. :wave:
sugarhitman is offline  
Old 01-15-2008, 02:55 PM   #176
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Florida
Posts: 19,796
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sugarhitman
So you are saying that Israel did not encounter resistance from Britian, and the Arabs? Our discussion is not about the Balfour declaration. It is about whether the Restoration of Israel is a self- fulfilling prophecy or not. A self-fulfilling prophecy is one in which you control the events and encounter little or no resistence.
Consider the following:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Self-fulfilling_prophecy

Quote:
Originally Posted by Wikipedia

A self-fulfilling prophecy is a prediction that directly or indirectly causes itself to become true. Although examples of such prophecies can be found in human literature as far back as ancient Greece and ancient India, it is 20th-century sociologist Robert K. Merton who is credited with coining the expression "self-fulfilling prophecy" and formalizing its structure and consequences. In his book Social Theory and Social Structure, Merton gives as a feature of the self-fulfilling prophecy:

“The self-fulfilling prophecy is, in the beginning, a false definition of the situation evoking a new behaviour which makes the original false conception come 'true'. This specious validity of the self-fulfilling prophecy perpetuates a reign of error. For the prophet will cite the actual course of events as proof that he was right from the very beginning.”

In other words, a true prophetic statement — a prophecy declared as truth when it is not — may sufficiently influence people, either through fear or logical confusion, so that their reactions ultimately fulfill the false prophecy.
The bottom line is "a true prophetic statement — a prophecy declared as truth when it is not — may sufficiently influence people, either through fear or logical confusion, so that their reactions ultimately fulfill the false prophecy." That contradicts your claim that "A self-fulfilling prophecy is one in which you control the events and encounter little or no resistence." Little of no resistance IS NOT a requirement of a self-fulling prophecy. If you have evidence to the contrary, please post your sources.

Belief in the Bible is the reason why a Jewish state was established in Palestine in 1948. God had nothing to do with it. If the Axis powers had won the Second World War instead of the Allies, the state of Israel in Palestine would not have been established. The U.S. emerged from the Second World War as the king of the world. At that time, the percentage of fundamentalist Christians in the U.S. was higher than it is now. Because of the Bible, it is quite natural that the U.S. approved of the Balfour Declaration.

What you need is reasonable proof the the state of Israel would not have been established in 1948 without God's help. You also need reasonable proof that Old Testament prophecies that mention Israel were divinely inspired.

Contrary to what you claimed, Israel has not been restored. God promised Abraham and his descendants ALL of the land of ancient Canaan. Today, Jews do not occupy ALL of the land of ancient Canaan.

Since you have never come up with any good reasons why God would want to predict the future, you lose hands down. Without sensible motives why God would want to predict the future, there are not any good reasons for anyone to believe that he predicts the future. If God wanted people to believe that he is able to predict the future, all that would have needed to do was predict when and where some natural disasters would occur. By "when," I mean month, day, and year.

Please be advised that I frequently will repost any parts of this post that you refuse to reply whether you reply to this post or not. That way, undecided readers will still be able to read my arguments.
Johnny Skeptic is offline  
Old 01-15-2008, 04:03 PM   #177
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Latin America
Posts: 4,066
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by martini View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by arnoldo View Post
I've read the bible a couple of times and I don't want to start quoting scriptures but in general the only thing that prevents the Jews from getting wiped out of the face of the earth is the return of their Messiah, Yeshua. The bible states something along the lines that the Jews will look upon the one they have pierced and question where Yeshua got his wounds... and will believe.
may i humbly ask what verse(s) you are referencing in the Tanach? :huh:

Sorry, I didn't want to get into quoting bible verses but the general idea comes from the following verses:

Zechariah 12:10. . . and they shall look upon me whom they have pierced. . .
Zechariah 13:6 . .If someone asks him, 'What are these wounds on your body ?' he will answer, 'The wounds I was given at the house of my friends.'

Again the general idea is that nothing short of the second coming of Yeshua is what is going to save the nation of Israel from being wiped off the face of the earth.
arnoldo is offline  
Old 01-15-2008, 04:16 PM   #178
Contributor
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Los Angeles area
Posts: 40,549
Default

Jews for Judaism on Zech 12:10
Quote:
ANALYSIS OF ZECHARIAH 12:10
10. "I will pour out on the house of David and on the inhabitants of Jerusalem the Spirit of grace and supplication, and they will look onto Me whom (et asher) they have pierced and they will mourn for Him as one mourns for an only son, and they will weep for Him like the weeping over a first born. 11. In that day there will be a great mourning in Jerusalem like the mourning of Hadadrimmon in the plain of Megiddo. 12. and the land will mourn every family by itself; the family of the house of David by itself; and their wives by themselves; the family of the house of Nathan by itself; and their wives by themselves..."
The Christian reading of this passage is somewhat problematic. The words "Me" and "Him" makes it quite obvious that the text is speaking of two different subjects. The gospel of John acknowledged this and therefore rendered the passage as, "they shall look on Him whom they pierced." This New Testament mistranslation of Zechariah in and of itself demonstrates that the New Testament is fallacious.

To interpret this passage that at some future time the "Jewish people shall look unto Me (G-d/Jesus) whom they (the Jewish people) pierced" does not seem to be what John had in mind. It is important to note that according to John, Zechariah's prophesy was fulfilled at the time that the Roman soldiers pierced the side of Jesus. As it says in John 19:36, "For these things came to pass that the scripture might be fulfilled." John saw the two different subjects of Zechariah's passage as the Roman soldiers and Jesus.

...
Toto is offline  
Old 01-15-2008, 04:23 PM   #179
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Latin America
Posts: 4,066
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Johnny Skeptic View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by arnoldo
It's not absurd if you consider that in order for the Jewish people to survive they needed a homeland for at least for enought time to establish they're cultural and religous identity.
But everyone needs to survive, not just Jews. What about the Canaanites who the Jews stole Canaan from? Why should Jews have gotten preferential treatment from God? Why did God choose the Jews to be his chosen people? Why did God turn his back on the rest of the people in the world during Old Testament times?
God basically choose the Jews because Abraham obeyed. Apparently Abraham heard God while he lived in Iraq and he left his homeland and sojourned to the land of Israel. The nation of Israel was a sign to all of the other nations during old testament times however Israel frequently stumbled and was conquered by other nations. In time God himself became a man and began to preach that the Kindgom of God is at hand. Through the Messiah people of all nations, tribes, and tongues can be saved.
arnoldo is offline  
Old 01-15-2008, 04:44 PM   #180
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: The temple of Isis at Memphis
Posts: 1,484
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sheshonq View Post
I am saying that you don't know what the Balfour declaration was.

I'm also saying that you don't have a clue as to the status of Jewish immigration before, or after, Balfour.

Finally, I'm saying that your understanding of world history is probably worse than your understanding of science -- which is saying quite a lot, actually.

I can guarantee you that I know far more about this than you do. If anyone embarrasses himself in this forum, it won't be me.


So you are saying that Israel did not encounter resistence from Britian,
Britain was instrumental in setting up modern-day Israel in the first place. Is "helping to create" somehow your definition of "resistance"?

Quote:
and the Arabs?
Yep. So? That does not support your claim that Israel's existence was in jeopardy or threatened by the Arabs.

Quote:
Our discussion is not about the Balfour declaration.
Oh, really? Then why did you bring it up? That was you, not me.

Quote:
It is about whether the Restoration of Israel is a self- fulfilling prophecy or not. A self-fulfilling prophecy is one in which you control the events and encounter little or no resistence.
There is no requirement that a self-fulfilling prophecy encounter no resistance. You should stop making things up - especially when you don't know what you're talking about.

Quote:
The Jews encountered much resistence, this is very well known, and your attempts to deny this is just that....DENIAL.
Hardly. My posts are the informed opinion of someone who has studied this for over 20 years.

Quote:
And so what if Israel had some sympathy from other countries and people.
"Sympathy"?

Britain carved out territory and gave it to them. Hardly "sympathy", more like "here are the keys to my house, my car, and my business. Help yourself."

You are either (a) ignorant of the history of this region of the world or (b) delibreately twisting the history. Given your track record, it's hard to decide which one is more likely.
Sheshonq is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 06:19 AM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.