Freethought & Rationalism ArchiveThe archives are read only. |
08-13-2005, 05:47 AM | #51 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Bli Bli
Posts: 3,135
|
Quote:
|
|
08-13-2005, 05:56 AM | #52 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: the reliquary of Ockham's razor
Posts: 4,035
|
Judge: All your peshitta are belong to us. Resistance is futile.
|
08-13-2005, 07:36 AM | #53 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Calgary, Alberta Canada
Posts: 2,612
|
Quote:
Regards, Rick Sumner |
|
08-13-2005, 04:24 PM | #54 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Bli Bli
Posts: 3,135
|
Quote:
You guys win..... :rolling: |
|
08-16-2005, 09:50 PM | #55 | |
Contributor
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: nowhere
Posts: 15,747
|
Quote:
spin |
|
08-19-2005, 08:48 AM | #56 | |||
Contributor
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: nowhere
Posts: 15,747
|
Quote:
judge, you simply can't just rehash other people's poor scholarship. One puny example to support your (only partially stated) case is nothing in itself, even if it were correct. You need a substantial argument backed by a solid array of evidence. You haven't gone down this path and have shown no intention of doing so. So, we've scratched the abysmal gbr) example, along with the salt example, now along with the Rom 5:7 example and numerous others whose particulars I have now long forgotten, though they can be found in the archives. I have often said that the major problem is that you are in no position to analyse the material you use, so you are not an informed proponent of your case. In fact I don't see why you even entertain the idea. If you can't do what I suggested in a previous post, I don't see why you still put the Aramaic primacy crock forward any more. Quote:
spin |
|||
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|