Bible John

Put your money in your mouth. I already told you that I have been having some issues and 2 weeks would be enough time. Do you still not believe me? Why do you have eyes that fail to see and ears that fail to hear?

John

Bible John

I am on vacation know, but let me return back to home out of the SF Bay Area (unfortunately) and wait till I get to my ibook on a broadband connection and I will post by Tuesday I promise you.

I've mentioned it before but many here have failed to hear that 2 weeks was all I needed.


John

Bible John

I am not Gastrich. Jason has given me ideas thats all. Me and Jason disagree on our views on the apostolic sign gifts, and with some aspects of ministry philosophy. As far as I am concerned I am a Fundementalist and Jason is in between a fundementalist and a evangelical. Jason also might have minor to moderate charismatic roots in Calvary Chapel and the SBC.

Also Jason is an apologist and I am a bible teacher.

If you are so bright then you can understand the differences. They certainly seperate the 2 majors in school. Obviously the doctors that run bible schools understand the differences.

John

Bible John

I have what the bible teaches. But for you since you do not view the bible has authority what I say will go upon deaf ears. The bible writers spoke for God since it is written all throughout the bible that they did. 2 Tim 3:16 is one verse that claims all scripture is given by inspiritation of God. Also in Joshua, Revelation among other places does it state that God divinly inspired the authors to write these books.

But for you there is only one that can save you. Repent and turn to the light while there is yet time.


John

Bible John

Why dont you visit free.christians and observe with your own eyes the Atheist and cult takeover there?

John

bobhope2112

I think it's not that people aren't hearing [reading] you, but that they don't believe you. You could mostly remedy this by continuing the debate.

Ask Pervy and the moderators if you can continue the formal debate with a two week interval. You've already commited to producing your Round 3 posting within a two week deadline. Since there's really only one more substantial round after that, you might well make it. I suspect Pervy would be game, and I see little reason for the moderators to object.

Even if the moderators don't want to accomodate you, you can continue the debate in an informal way here, in this peanut gallery. Pervy has already made an appearance. So, go ahead, make some effort to finish what you started. It's the only way that I can see for you to combat the notion that you've been wilted by Pervy's scholarship.

SonOfFred

It's worse than that. You've copied him and his tactics.

Actually, he presumes to be an "apologist" and you presume to be a "bible teacher." Neither of you has demontrated any competence in these areas, however.

They are also irrelevant and diversionary to my point. I proved that you use Gastrich's prayers as a template of sorts, and you clearly envy the attention he gets.

Like "Doctor" Gastrich and "Doctor" Tio...or the other "doctors" who got "doctorates" from schools that don't challenge them to think?

And I should be impressed...why...?

SonOfFred

Weren't you also on vacation, playing video games and watching movies, when your previous entry in the formal debate was due? And were you on vacation, playing video games and watching movies, when the extension grace period came and went?

SonOfFred

Maybe it's just that we're not buying your boasting, followed by your excuses and your delaying tactics.

gagster

I'd rather not. Most money doesn't taste very good.

What are you trying to say here? The only thing I can figure is you're trying to say "Put your money where your mouth is", which would be a way of saying that you're challenging me to a debate. Is that what you're trying to do? If so, I'm sorry, but I have no interest in debating this subject and I have no interest in debating you.



No. Why should I? In three rounds, you were late three times. As best I can tell, your (two) posts were written at the last minute. The last minute of a two week period is no longer than the last minute of a one week period.


My eyes and ears work just fine. That's why I believe that the reality does not match your claims. Go ahead and get right back in another debate if you really want to. I suspect that the same factors that caused you to abandon this debate will cause you to abandon the next. So, I really think you should take a break for at least a few months, follow other debates, contribute to the peanut gallery and seriously contemplate whether or not you're ready for another try. But, if you insist on trying to prove me wrong, I can't stop you (and wouldn't if I could). Good luck.


Greg