FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > Religion (Closed) > Biblical Criticism & History
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Yesterday at 03:12 PM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 01-05-2009, 02:49 PM   #861
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 359
Default

Quote:
sorry, not seeing anything miraculous about that.
So Muhammed travelling from Mecca to Jerusalem in an instant, witnessing the presence of God and performing the same miracles as Moses not miraculous?
God making the Pagans of Quraysh blind all of a sudden so that Muhammed could flee to Mecca is not miraculous?
Quote:
then you should be able to point out the differences and their theological signficance without any problem. Please proceed. Should be an easy claim to prove.
This would be a deviation from the thread. Go read any neutral book on the Dead Sea Scrolls.
Quote:
If God speak but is unable to preserve his Word, it is problematic.
It is not. Why would He preserve a scripture, that was sent for specific times and peoples, for all time?
Quote:
If you claim God's word can be corrupted, then you will have to acknowledge that the Koran is also subject to that same possibility.
The Quran (Not "Koran"), isnot subject to that same possibility because God promised to preserve it. The same cannot be said of the Bible.
Quote:
If God says that the sentence that comes from his mouth cannot be changed, then why was it changed? Did he mean only certain sentences?
There is a difference between God fulfilling His words and preserving certain Scriptures.
Quote:
Why not claim the same for the Koran?
Because the Quran claims to be the last Book for all humanity.
Quote:
Why did Mohammed refer to Isa and teh Injil if it was corrupted. What was he referring to then if that the Isa and Injil that happened to be the only one in existence at his time.
The Quran refered to Eisa and the Injil to rebuke the Christians for their deviation from God. Christians follow 4 Gospels that supposedly were written by "eye-witnesses". What the Quran says is that God sent Eisa a book called the Injil, same like Moses with the Torah and Muhammed with the Quran. The Quran tells the Christians to follow that Injil, and following that Injil will lead them to Islam.
Quote:
I have read no christian sources on the subject. I have read only the Koran and it says that the Book from Musa is the Word of God. I see what the Koran says and then I hear what you say. that is it.
Indeed, the Book that was sent to Moses from was the word of God. The book that the Jews had at the time of Muhammed was not the Torah of Moses. The Quran speaks against that book as I said.
Quote:
I see where you have stated their is corruption but I do not see that at all in the verse from the Koran. it says "ye observe the Torah and the Gospel and that which was revealed unto you from your Lord." nothing about corruption.
First of all the Injil is lost. Christians no longer have that book. What you have are 4 biographies of Jesus.
Secondly the Torah here is the Torah that was sent to Moses. The Torah in the Quran always refers to the Torah at the time of Moses.
Thirdly the verse asks them to follow the Quran, which represents the original Torah and Injil. If the verse meant that the Torah at the time of Muhammed was genuine, it would not have asked them to follow the Quran.
Quote:
Mohammed was talking about the Torah, he did not say corrupted. You did.
The Quran (Not Muhammed) was talking about the Torah given unto Moses, the original Torah.
Quote:
This says nothing about the Torah or the Injil. it says Woe to those who, present tense. He is not talking about those who wrote, past tense.
Grammar in English is different from Arabic grammar, thus some mistranslations exist. The verse is in present perfect tense.
Quote:
No, I did not.
So why did you mention it?
Quote:
of course they do - out of fear for life or loss of family.
The visions are fake man. Get over it. If they were true then there would be nothing preventing your God from appearing in person to people all over the world.
Clinical is offline  
Old 01-05-2009, 03:54 PM   #862
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: U.K
Posts: 217
Default .

Quote:
He obviously did not say he will never say anything to anyone who is not a disciple that is not a parable.
2 He taught them many things by parables, and in his teaching said:
3 "Listen! A farmer went out to sow his seed...
9 Then Jesus said, "He who has ears to hear, let him hear."
10 When he was alone, the Twelve and the others around him asked him
about the parables. 11 He told them, "The secret of the kingdom of God has been given to you. But to those on the outside everything is said in parables 12 so that, they may be ever seeing but never perceiving, and ever hearing but never understanding; otherwise they might turn and be
forgiven!'"


(Matt 13:36) Then he left the crowds and went into the house. And his disciples came to him saying, "Explain to us the parable of the weeds in the field."(Matt 13:37) He answered, "The one who sowed the good seed is the Son of Man.

My understanding of the verses in mark above is that IMPORTANT teachings were coded into parables and the outsiders would never understand and never take in what they heard because the teachings were coded.
note the word "ever" is used
the first definition for "ever" to come up on microsoft vista was
"at any time"

so at any time they (outsiders) will never understand and never perceive because what is taught is in parables.

(Mark 8:34)
Then Jesus called the crowd, along with his disciples, and said to them...
(Mark 8:38) For if anyone is ashamed of me and my words in this adulterous and sinful generation, the Son of Man will also be ashamed of him when he comes in the glory of his Father with the holy angels."

if the outsiders never understood and never percieved then how did they know that the son of man who will come is jesus himself? without knowing who the sower of the good seed is , the crowd thought the son of man is some other guy.
Net2004 is offline  
Old 01-05-2009, 04:11 PM   #863
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Metro Detroit, MI
Posts: 3,201
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Clinical View Post
Quote:
sorry, not seeing anything miraculous about that.
So Muhammed travelling from Mecca to Jerusalem in an instant, witnessing the presence of God and performing the same miracles as Moses not miraculous?
God making the Pagans of Quraysh blind all of a sudden so that Muhammed could flee to Mecca is not miraculous?
from wikipedia

In Islamic tradition, the Isra and Mi'raj (Arabic: الإسراء والمعراج‎, al-’Isrā’ wal-Mi‘rāğ) are the two parts of a journey that Muhammad took in one night, around the year 620. Many Muslims consider it a physical journey but some Islamic scholars consider it a dream.[1] A brief sketch of the story is in verses 1 and 60 of one of the Qur'an chapters (#17: sura al isra), and other details were filled in from the supplemental writings, the hadith.


Did anyone see him fly to Jerusalem? This is a perfect example of the difference. No collaboration. If you get some of those pagans to write about it, then that would be something. this is what occurred with Jesus. The NT is written from all manner of person. Paul used to kill Christians until he became one - thru a vision.

Quote:
This would be a deviation from the thread. Go read any neutral book on the Dead Sea Scrolls.
This whole conversation is a deviation. The fact is that the Torah we have is the same one that the Palestiinian Jews had and is the same one translated into Greek. They remain consistent. Nothing changes the message.

Quote:
The Quran (Not "Koran"), isnot subject to that same possibility because God promised to preserve it. The same cannot be said of the Bible.

There is a difference between God fulfilling His words and preserving certain Scriptures.

Because the Quran claims to be the last Book for all humanity.

The Quran refered to Eisa and the Injil to rebuke the Christians for their deviation from God. Christians follow 4 Gospels that supposedly were written by "eye-witnesses". What the Quran says is that God sent Eisa a book called the Injil, same like Moses with the Torah and Muhammed with the Quran. The Quran tells the Christians to follow that Injil, and following that Injil will lead them to Islam.

Indeed, the Book that was sent to Moses from was the word of God. The book that the Jews had at the time of Muhammed was not the Torah of Moses. The Quran speaks against that book as I said.

First of all the Injil is lost. Christians no longer have that book. What you have are 4 biographies of Jesus.
Secondly the Torah here is the Torah that was sent to Moses. The Torah in the Quran always refers to the Torah at the time of Moses.
Thirdly the verse asks them to follow the Quran, which represents the original Torah and Injil. If the verse meant that the Torah at the time of Muhammed was genuine, it would not have asked them to follow the Quran.

The Quran (Not Muhammed) was talking about the Torah given unto Moses, the original Torah.
Here is how I know that is not true. Mohammed in Surah 5:68-69 is referring to the Jews and Christians of his day and admonishes them for not following the Torah and the Injil. Why would he insist they follow a book that is lost or has been corrupted?

Surah 5:68-69
Say: O followers of the Book! you follow no good till you keep up the Taurat and the Injeel and that which is revealed to you from your Lord; and surely that which has been revealed to you from your Lord shall make many of them increase in inordinacy and unbelief; grieve not therefore for the unbelieving people. Surely those who believe and those who are Jews and the Sabians and the Christians whoever believes in Allah and the last day and does good -- they shall have no fear nor shall they grieve.

There is really no point in continuing this. If you do not want to provide the proof of the corruption then let's just leave it at that. I would rather argue with the atheists.
sschlichter is offline  
Old 01-05-2009, 04:25 PM   #864
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Metro Detroit, MI
Posts: 3,201
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Net2004 View Post
Quote:
He obviously did not say he will never say anything to anyone who is not a disciple that is not a parable.
2 He taught them many things by parables, and in his teaching said:
3 "Listen! A farmer went out to sow his seed...
9 Then Jesus said, "He who has ears to hear, let him hear."
10 When he was alone, the Twelve and the others around him asked him
about the parables. 11 He told them, "The secret of the kingdom of God has been given to you. But to those on the outside everything is said in parables 12 so that, they may be ever seeing but never perceiving, and ever hearing but never understanding; otherwise they might turn and be
forgiven!'"


(Matt 13:36) Then he left the crowds and went into the house. And his disciples came to him saying, "Explain to us the parable of the weeds in the field."(Matt 13:37) He answered, "The one who sowed the good seed is the Son of Man.

My understanding of the verses in mark above is that IMPORTANT teachings are coded into parables and the outsiders will never understand and never take in what they have heard because the teachings are coded.
note the word "ever" is used
the first definition for "ever" to come up on microsoft vista was
"at any time"

so at any time they (outsiders) will never understand and never perceive because what is taught is in parables.

(Mark 8:34)
Then Jesus called the crowd, along with his disciples, and said to them...
(Mark 8:38) For if anyone is ashamed of me and my words in this adulterous and sinful generation, the Son of Man will also be ashamed of him when he comes in the glory of his Father with the holy angels."

if the outsiders never understood and never percieved then how did they know that the son of man who will come is jesus himself? without knowing who the sower of the good seed is , the crowd thought the son of man is some other guy.
I think that is incorrect because of the verses from Mark that were important teachings that he taught in public.

I think this is a good translation.

But to those outside, everything is in parables,
Mark 4:12 so that "although they look they may look but not see,
and although they hear they may hear but not understand,
so they may not repent and be forgiven."

Jesus was clear who the Son of man was.

Jesus to the crowds...
(Mark 8:38) For if anyone is ashamed of me and my words in this adulterous and sinful generation, the Son of Man will also be ashamed of him when he comes in the glory of his Father with the holy angels."
sschlichter is offline  
Old 01-06-2009, 11:53 AM   #865
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: West Virginina
Posts: 4,349
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sschlichter View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by WVIncagold View Post

Why do you not answer questions?
Because your question assumes we live in a moral culture and I cannot answer it when I know we are not moral.
Based on what?
WVIncagold is offline  
Old 01-06-2009, 11:56 AM   #866
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: West Virginina
Posts: 4,349
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sugarhitman View Post



Having an education without wisdom=none
Well at least you have narowed your problem down. Ignorance is curable though. the first step is realizing it.
WVIncagold is offline  
Old 01-06-2009, 12:48 PM   #867
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Metro Detroit, MI
Posts: 3,201
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by WVIncagold View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by sschlichter View Post

Because your question assumes we live in a moral culture and I cannot answer it when I know we are not moral.
Based on what?
What, you need examples of our immorality?
sschlichter is offline  
Old 01-06-2009, 12:56 PM   #868
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: West Virginina
Posts: 4,349
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sschlichter View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by WVIncagold View Post

Based on what?
What, you need examples of our immorality?
No what are you basing morality on?
WVIncagold is offline  
Old 01-07-2009, 07:41 AM   #869
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 359
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sschlichter
from wikipedia

In Islamic tradition, the Isra and Mi'raj (Arabic: الإسراء والمعراج‎, al-’Isrā’ wal-Mi‘rāğ) are the two parts of a journey that Muhammad took in one night, around the year 620. Many Muslims consider it a physical journey but some Islamic scholars consider it a dream.[1] A brief sketch of the story is in verses 1 and 60 of one of the Qur'an chapters (#17: sura al isra), and other details were filled in from the supplemental writings, the hadith.


Did anyone see him fly to Jerusalem? This is a perfect example of the difference. No collaboration. If you get some of those pagans to write about it, then that would be something. this is what occurred with Jesus. The NT is written from all manner of person. Paul used to kill Christians until he became one - thru a vision.
I never heard of any Islamic scholars who believed it to be a dream. Anyway the Arabic word here is "asraa", which is physical. So their position, if existent, is false.
People did certainly see him because this was identical to Moses' encounter with God at Mount Toor (Sinai). So there is certainly collaboration here. You also did not comment on the 2 other miracles I mentioned.
You ask for evidence from Pagans? Did 1st century Pagans write anything on Jesus, never mind his miracles? You have nothing except what Christian propagandists in the Gospels tell you. Same with us, we only have the Quran, so far at least.
You mention Paul, but do we have independent verification of what he said? Do we have any evidence from the 500 people who were with him in that "vision"? No.
Quote:
This whole conversation is a deviation. The fact is that the Torah we have is the same one that the Palestiinian Jews had and is the same one translated into Greek. They remain consistent. Nothing changes the message.
That's not true. You can read "The Dead Sea Scrolls And The Christian Myth (or via: amazon.co.uk)" by John Allegro, and "The Dead Sea Scrolls Bible: The Oldest Known Bible Translated for the First Time into English (or via: amazon.co.uk)" by Martin G. Abegg, Peter Flint and Eugene Ulrich.
Quote:
Here is how I know that is not true. Mohammed in Surah 5:68-69 is referring to the Jews and Christians of his day and admonishes them for not following the Torah and the Injil. Why would he insist they follow a book that is lost or has been corrupted?
Read the verses again "
Say: O followers of the Book! you follow no good till you keep up the Taurat and the Injeel and that which is revealed to you from your Lord;"
Follow the original Torah and Injil = Follow that which revealed to you from your Lord = Quran.
It cannot refer to the Torah at the 7th century because it was not similar to the Quran at all. Same for the Injil which was lost at the time. Verse 2:79 confirms my views here.
The second verse "Surely those who believe and those who are Jews and the Sabians and the Christians whoever believes in Allah and the last day and does good -- they shall have no fear nor shall they grieve." is talking about those who believe in Allah (The original followers of the prophets), or those who convert and believe in the Quran. Those who do not believe in Allah will be judged fairly by God at Judgment Day (22:17).
Quote:
There is really no point in continuing this. If you do not want to provide the proof of the corruption then let's just leave it at that. I would rather argue with the atheists.
Have a look at the 2 books I cited to you. For the Quran read verse 2:79.
Clinical is offline  
Old 01-07-2009, 08:05 AM   #870
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: georgia
Posts: 2,726
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Clinical View Post
Quote:
from wikipedia

In Islamic tradition, the Isra and Mi'raj (Arabic: الإسراء والمعراج‎, al-’Isrā’ wal-Mi‘rāğ) are the two parts of a journey that Muhammad took in one night, around the year 620. Many Muslims consider it a physical journey but some Islamic scholars consider it a dream.[1] A brief sketch of the story is in verses 1 and 60 of one of the Qur'an chapters (#17: sura al isra), and other details were filled in from the supplemental writings, the hadith.


Did anyone see him fly to Jerusalem? This is a perfect example of the difference. No collaboration. If you get some of those pagans to write about it, then that would be something. this is what occurred with Jesus. The NT is written from all manner of person. Paul used to kill Christians until he became one - thru a vision.
I never heard of any Islamic scholars who believed it to be a dream. Anyway the Arabic word here is "asraa", which is physical. So their position, if existent, is false.
People did certainly see him because this was identical to Moses' encounter with God at Mount Toor (Sinai). So there is certainly collaboration here. You also did not comment on the 2 other miracles I mentioned.
You ask for evidence from Pagans? Did 1st century Pagans write anything on Jesus, never mind his miracles? You have nothing except what Christian propagandists in the Gospels tell you. Same with us, we only have the Quran, so far at least.
You mention Paul, but do we have independent verification of what he said? Do we have any evidence from the 500 people who were with him in that "vision"? No.

That's not true. You can read "The Dead Sea Scrolls And The Christian Myth" by John Allegro, and "The Dead Sea Scrolls Bible: The Oldest Known Bible Translated for the First Time into English" by Martin G. Abegg, Peter Flint and Eugene Ulrich.

Read the verses again "
Say: O followers of the Book! you follow no good till you keep up the Taurat and the Injeel and that which is revealed to you from your Lord;"
Follow the original Torah and Injil = Follow that which revealed to you from your Lord = Quran.
It cannot refer to the Torah at the 7th century because it was not similar to the Quran at all. Same for the Injil which was lost at the time. Verse 2:79 confirms my views here.
The second verse "Surely those who believe and those who are Jews and the Sabians and the Christians whoever believes in Allah and the last day and does good -- they shall have no fear nor shall they grieve." is talking about those who believe in Allah (The original followers of the prophets), or those who convert and believe in the Quran. Those who do not believe in Allah will be judged fairly by God at Judgment Day (22:17).
Quote:
There is really no point in continuing this. If you do not want to provide the proof of the corruption then let's just leave it at that. I would rather argue with the atheists.
Have a look at the 2 books I cited to you. For the Quran read verse 2:79.
In the book of Isaiah and others the ability to prophesy proves that a prophet is a prophet and God is God......where are Muhammed's? Where is Islam's?
sugarhitman is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 06:22 AM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.