![]() |
Freethought & Rationalism ArchiveThe archives are read only. |
![]() |
#1 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: N/A
Posts: 4,370
|
![]()
I have added translations of these to the Additional Fathers:
The 'Marcionite' prologues to the letters of St. Paul The "Anti-Marcionite" prologues to the Gospels Both are copyright-free, and copying and reposting is encouraged. All the best, Roger Pearse |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Midwest
Posts: 4,787
|
![]() Quote:
If you ever get the urge to upload English translations of the Monarchian prologues, let me know. ![]() Ben. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#3 | |
Banned
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Queens, NY
Posts: 2,293
|
![]() Quote:
And I can see why orthodox Christians might not be enthused to make these documents a part of their historical expositions, since it indicates a church with no vestige of the overt Trinitarian doctrine, with a oneness or Monarchian perspective coming forth in the Latin church. Anyway, that is the sense that I get so far. Shalom, Steven http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Messianic_Apologetic |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#4 | ||
Veteran Member
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: N/A
Posts: 4,370
|
![]() Quote:
Quote:
Mark, the evangelist of God and son in baptism and disciple in the divine word of the blessed apostle Peter, undertaking the priesthood in Israel according to the flesh as a Levite, having been converted to the faith of Christ, wrote the gospel in Italy, *showing in it what was owed both to his race and to Christ* (ostendens...Christo not sure about). For the beginning of the preface has showed that ... Yuk -- it gets all nasty from there on in, and all in one sentence! Surely someone must have translated these? All the best, Roger Pearse |
||
![]() |
![]() |
#5 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: N/A
Posts: 4,370
|
![]() Quote:
Roger |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#6 | |
Banned
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Queens, NY
Posts: 2,293
|
![]() Quote:
Another question. We were discussing Old Latin manuscripts and there are about 30 extant, yet for any section of the gospels maybe 1/3 or 1/2 that number, since they are usually partial. So we can conjecture that less than a dozen would have an extant prologue of any type ? So are we including Vulgate manuscripts here as well ? Assuming that most manuscripts can be clumped on one side or another of that category distinction. What do you think ... I realize this is getting a tad techie. Shalom, Steven |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#7 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Midwest
Posts: 4,787
|
![]() Quote:
The Catholic Encyclopedia says that the Monarchian prologues are found in most old Vulgate manuscripts. They are also found in medieval gospel texts such as the Lindsfarne gospels. Ben. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#8 | |||
Veteran Member
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Midwest
Posts: 4,787
|
![]() Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Ben. |
|||
![]() |
![]() |
#9 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: USA
Posts: 1,307
|
![]() Quote:
Stephen |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#10 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Midwest
Posts: 4,787
|
![]() Quote:
That second book sounds interesting in its own right. Ben. |
|
![]() |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|