Freethought & Rationalism ArchiveThe archives are read only. |
10-11-2005, 10:44 AM | #1 |
Regular Member
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: TalkingTimeline.com
Posts: 151
|
Looking for this work of Jerome
In studying the Virgin Birth, I often see the following quote from Jerome:
Jerome, Adv. Javianum I, 32; N&PNF, vi, 370 However, I've been unable to find the text online. I'm not even sure what some of it stands for. Can someone give a hand? Thanks. |
10-11-2005, 10:47 AM | #2 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Washington, DC (formerly Denmark)
Posts: 3,789
|
Are you sure you don't mean Jerome's Adversus Jovinianum? I could find no references to the title you specify.
Julian |
10-11-2005, 11:12 AM | #3 |
Regular Member
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: TalkingTimeline.com
Posts: 151
|
No, I'm not sure of anything on this. However, if you search for just the reference I listed, you'll find a dozen people all copying the following quote, then giving that reference. Here's a sample of what is posted on several websites.
Jerome says, "I know that the Jews are accustomed to meet us with the objection that in Hebrew the word Almah does not mean a Virgin, but a young woman. And, to speak truth, a virgin is properly called Bethulah, but a young woman, or a girl, is not Almah, but Naarah"! (Jerome, Adv. Javianum I, 32; N&PNF, vi, 370.) |
10-11-2005, 11:20 AM | #4 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: greater Orlando area
Posts: 832
|
I'm looking at it (in a real book!) as we speak:
Jerome, Against Jovinianus, Book 1, chapter 32; Nicene and Post-Nicene Fathers, vol. 6, p. 370. My set is published by Hendrickson. Following the quote above, Jerome goes on to explain how Rebecca (in Genesis) is also described as an almah, and that the purpose there is to bring out the notion that the "maiden" that came to draw from the well was "a virgin secluded, and guarded by her parents with extreme care." Now, I don't know about all that, but it is my opinion that the Isaiah passage in question is largely misunderstood (by apologists and their counterparts) anyways. Best, CJD |
10-11-2005, 11:46 AM | #5 |
Regular Member
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: TalkingTimeline.com
Posts: 151
|
Perfect. Thanks for that.
|
10-11-2005, 01:25 PM | #6 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: USA
Posts: 1,307
|
The Nicene and Post-Nicene Fathers series has been on-line for a while Here is a link to this page of Jerome's: http://www.ccel.org/ccel/schaff/npnf206.vi.vi.I.html
|
10-11-2005, 02:27 PM | #8 | |
Regular Member
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: TalkingTimeline.com
Posts: 151
|
Quote:
|
|
10-12-2005, 06:35 AM | #9 | |
Regular Member
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: TalkingTimeline.com
Posts: 151
|
Quote:
If a husband find his new wife "not a maid [bethulah]," then on his complaint her parents must "bring forth the tokens of the virginity [bethulah] of the maid [naarah]" (Deut. 22:14, 15). |
|
10-13-2005, 12:05 AM | #10 |
Regular Member
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Oceania
Posts: 334
|
Thanks. So what's the difference between 'almah' and 'naarah' then?
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|