Freethought & Rationalism ArchiveThe archives are read only. |
04-15-2008, 09:42 AM | #31 | ||
Regular Member
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: California, USA
Posts: 338
|
Nazareth?
Quote:
BTW, if you know of any published scholarship presenting or arguing the evidence for or against Nazareth (obviously apart from Zindler and Salm), please let me know. Quote:
This I consider unresolvable. One can only ask whether (or to what degree) the Gospel "according to Mark" corresponds with or contradicts Paul's gospel, theology, soteriology, etc. (either of which it can do regardless of whether the author of Mark knew Paul personally). My hope with this book is to give scholars a framework with which to thoroughly explore (if not resolve) the questions that interest each of them (since everyone has different interests and specializations), and integrate them together toward a coherent overall theory (assembled from the work of many scholars each doing what they do best). |
||
04-15-2008, 11:09 PM | #32 |
Contributor
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Lebanon, OR, USA
Posts: 16,829
|
I'd recommend considering how one tells fact from fiction for other notable people in the past.
I've even scored Harry Potter and Anakin, Luke, and Leia Skywalker, finding them all rather high. But then again, JK Rowling and George Lucas were likely familiar with a lot of mythology, even if not Lord Raglan's work. |
04-16-2008, 10:32 PM | #33 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: ""
Posts: 3,863
|
Quote:
|
|
04-17-2008, 01:27 AM | #34 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: England
Posts: 5,629
|
One point of comparison could be Benjamin Creme's movement , which declares that the Maitreya is a real person living now, and indeed living in the Brick Lane district of London.
But does such a person exist, despite Creme's biographical details about him? |
04-17-2008, 04:56 PM | #36 |
Banned
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: The American Empire (i.e., Earth)
Posts: 1,828
|
No offense to anyone, but having Richard write a book on the historicity of Jesus seems like a wasted opportunity to me. I understand I'm in the minority here, but I don't actually care whether or not Jesus existed. Either way, the damage has been done. That said, I can't think of a better subject for Richard to tackle, off the top of my head. :huh:
|
04-17-2008, 11:42 PM | #37 |
Contributor
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Los Angeles area
Posts: 40,549
|
|
04-22-2008, 04:19 AM | #38 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Mornington Peninsula
Posts: 1,306
|
Been in Aotearoa!
er, yeah, $250 No worries! |
04-24-2008, 04:50 PM | #39 | |||
Regular Member
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: California, USA
Posts: 338
|
Plans
Quote:
Indeed. I already planned something like this (including a discussion of the "historicity" of Socrates, for example). I may do Alexander the Great instead of Julius Caesar, though. And I don't think I'll spend much time on persons from other historical eras, since the context is so different (and I am not as solidly an expert in those periods). Quote:
Indeed. This is already on the menu. I'll be treating the subject with a more limited and logical approach than perhaps has been done (since I specifically want to avoid the need for over-theorizing, as I believe more extensive forays in that direction should follow, not precede, the grounding of a position on historicity). Quote:
Please email me your citations of examples from ancient sources, both of prodigy and prophecy details (and if I use this I'll credit you, so state how you want to be credited and whether you relied on any other scholars for the discovery). Do you have a theory as to why this aggregation of attributes remains so appealing, even in a radically different society now like ours? |
|||
04-27-2008, 07:27 PM | #40 | |
Junior Member
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Cary, NC, USA
Posts: 42
|
A Methodology for 3 Equations
Dear R.Carrier,
You said at the beginning: Quote:
- One only on the methodology very soon - One, several years later, on your own result applying your own method, that might be accepted at the time as a reference for secular people. The problem about Jesus Historicity vs Myth resides in the 3 group of Christian/Jewish texts from the 1st century, with, for each one, its own equation about Jesus: 1 Jesus from the Epistles = Jesus of Nazareth from the Gospels 2 Jesus of Nazareth is the Author of the first Galilean Sayings 3 The Number of reliable Events in the Gospels > 0 If you can just provide us an honest methodology with a dozen of major criterias for each case, that would help tremendously. Then we will have to compare if there are more chances that they are all true or all false, or other weird scenarios... I would buy 100 of your books... All the Best, http://www.FromChristToJesus.org (web site still in construction...) |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|