Freethought & Rationalism ArchiveThe archives are read only. |
01-22-2004, 01:42 PM | #11 | |
Contributor
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Deep in the heart of mother-lovin' Texas
Posts: 29,689
|
Quote:
|
|
01-22-2004, 01:47 PM | #12 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Madison WI USA
Posts: 3,508
|
Re: Re: The Problem of Original Sin
Quote:
From what I gather, orthodox Christian doctrine holds that Jesus is considered sinless because there was no copulation between Joseph and Mary, and the act of copulation is where the sin originates. There's nothing in that doctrine at all about your claim, "sin is passed through the father". |
|
01-22-2004, 02:01 PM | #13 |
Banned
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Alaska
Posts: 9,159
|
Maybe someone can explain to me where this concept of original sin and all of us being guilty because of Adam arises before the NT. I don't even see the word "sin" in the Adam and Eve story. I see God curses the snake and the woman and the man. He's going to make them suffer on earth.
Seems to me that the OT God pretty much punishes people in the here and now as opposed to all eternity. When Moses comes down off Sinai with his chocolate tablets and sees the golden calf , he doesn't make reference to Adam. The flood isn't referenced to Adam. Etc. I see there in Romans:5 where Paul seems to be making a logical construct: We all are sinners because of one man and by law of symmetry we are all saved by one man. There are two problems with that, of course - the first is that I don't see where the Jews had this concept previously. The second is that there is no law of "symmetry". |
01-22-2004, 02:01 PM | #14 |
Contributor
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Deep in the heart of mother-lovin' Texas
Posts: 29,689
|
If what Magus said is true, then there would be no need for the virgin birth. Mary could have been married for years with multiple children before Jesus.
|
01-22-2004, 02:24 PM | #15 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: USA
Posts: 7,204
|
Quote:
|
|
01-22-2004, 02:33 PM | #16 | ||
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: USA
Posts: 5,393
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
||
01-22-2004, 02:37 PM | #17 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: USA
Posts: 7,204
|
Re: Re: Re: The Problem of Original Sin
Quote:
|
|
01-22-2004, 03:39 PM | #18 | |
Contributor
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Deep in the heart of mother-lovin' Texas
Posts: 29,689
|
Quote:
|
|
01-22-2004, 03:44 PM | #19 | |
Contributor
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Deep in the heart of mother-lovin' Texas
Posts: 29,689
|
Re: Re: Re: Re: The Problem of Original Sin
Quote:
How in hell is "sin" supposed to be genetically inherited? How would you code for sin in DNA? And that argument pretty much eliminates either of the genealogies in the Gospel, and the claim that Jesus was descended from David, doesn't it? |
|
01-22-2004, 03:46 PM | #20 | |
Contributor
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Deep in the heart of mother-lovin' Texas
Posts: 29,689
|
Quote:
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|