FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > Religion (Closed) > Biblical Criticism & History
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Today at 03:12 PM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 01-05-2006, 03:03 PM   #1
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: USA, Missouri
Posts: 3,070
Default Assuming the crucifixion happened--how is Christianity created?

If we assume some man named Jesus was crucified, what might explain the rise of Christianity from such an event? Doesn't this likely imply something about how that man was perceived? What do you think would be some minimum reasonable conclusions about the man or his death?

ted
TedM is offline  
Old 01-05-2006, 03:12 PM   #2
Contributor
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Los Angeles area
Posts: 40,549
Default

I would think it would have less to do with how the man was perceived, and more to do with what the needs of the population were. If you need a hero-savior, you tend to project those qualities on someone.
Toto is offline  
Old 01-05-2006, 03:16 PM   #3
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: USA, Missouri
Posts: 3,070
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Toto
I would think it would have less to do with how the man was perceived, and more to do with what the needs of the population were. If you need a hero-savior, you tend to project those qualities on someone.
Ok, I assume you think the early Christians would not have projected positive qualities on someone they perceived had been a true criminal--a thief or murderer, right? Why might they have projected qualities on this particular man? Would the reason for crucifixion have been a factor? How about the timing of the crucifixion? How about the reputation of the man? How about the man's prior beliefs? Just curious as to what scenarios you think would make it work. Again, this is all under the assumption that such a man really existed.

ted
TedM is offline  
Old 01-05-2006, 03:33 PM   #4
Contributor
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Los Angeles area
Posts: 40,549
Default

There's a lot of room for imagination but no real facts to work with. The crucified man could have been a military-religious leader or a political agitator. He only needed one or two good friends to imagine that he was still speaking to them, for their own reasons.
Toto is offline  
Old 01-05-2006, 03:46 PM   #5
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
Posts: 503
Default

Here is how Spinoza accounts for it:
God manifested Himself to the Apostles through the mind of Christ as He formerly did to Moses through the supernatural voice. In this sense the voice of Christ, like the voice which Moses heard, may be called the voice of God, and it may be said that the wisdom of God (i.e. wisdom more than human) took upon itself in Christ human nature, and that Christ was the way of salvation.
freigeister is offline  
Old 01-05-2006, 05:13 PM   #6
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: In the torture chambers of Pinochet's Chile
Posts: 2,112
Default

One messed up dude, Saul of Tarsus, has visions of him, and convinces everyone else that the visions are real.
countjulian is offline  
Old 01-05-2006, 05:45 PM   #7
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Canada
Posts: 1,562
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TedM
If we assume some man named Jesus was crucified, what might explain the rise of Christianity from such an event? Doesn't this likely imply something about how that man was perceived? What do you think would be some minimum reasonable conclusions about the man or his death?

ted
I was going to start a thread on "how do you go from resurrection to Christianity?" Yours is a bit more down to earth.

I think that you will need a lot of midrash.
Christianity came out of the Jewish Scriptures not from any man called Jesus.
NOGO is offline  
Old 01-05-2006, 06:00 PM   #8
Banned
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: In a house
Posts: 736
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Toto
I would think it would have less to do with how the man was perceived, and more to do with what the needs of the population were. If you need a hero-savior, you tend to project those qualities on someone.
A Jewish carpenter, a commoner who never even wrote anything down and then died a criminal's death on a cross, doesn't exactly fit the bill for a hero-savior.
People who create hero-saviors tend to build them up as mighty and strong, going off and slaying a minotaur or performing labors.
A guy who gets crucified, then tells his followers to take up their own crosses and follow him, doesn't sound like any normal invention by the population.
Heck, there is more reason to believe Alexander the Great was a creation than Jesus.
Peter Watts is offline  
Old 01-05-2006, 06:03 PM   #9
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: The Big State in the South
Posts: 448
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by freigeister
Here is how Spinoza accounts for it:
God manifested Himself to the Apostles through the mind of Christ as He formerly did to Moses through the supernatural voice. In this sense the voice of Christ, like the voice which Moses heard, may be called the voice of God, and it may be said that the wisdom of God (i.e. wisdom more than human) took upon itself in Christ human nature, and that Christ was the way of salvation.
I thought Spinoza was Jewish. Am I confusing him with another Spinoza maybe?

Boomeister
Boomeister is offline  
Old 01-05-2006, 06:13 PM   #10
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Eagle River, Alaska
Posts: 7,816
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TedM
If we assume some man named Jesus was crucified, what might explain the rise of Christianity from such an event?
I would say Christianity rose more from claims of a risen Christ.

Quote:
Doesn't this likely imply something about how that man was perceived?
I think it implies more about those who first preached the gospel of the risen Christ. It implies that they were very convincing preachers, respected personalities, and/or had an audience that was eager to accept what they were being taught.

Quote:
What do you think would be some minimum reasonable conclusions about the man or his death?
If we assume the first apostles knew him, I think we have to assume he was loved by them. Not enough to die with him but certainly enough to convince themselves he had been resurrected.
Amaleq13 is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:55 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.