FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > Religion (Closed) > Biblical Criticism & History
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Yesterday at 03:12 PM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 02-13-2008, 10:46 AM   #221
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: The temple of Isis at Memphis
Posts: 1,484
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Minimalist View Post
So, there is a big difference between no ships and some ships. Frankly, I can't see how an effective siege could be maintained against an island without a navy and that was Nebby's reason for his failure....and he did FAIL.
Many ancient sieges ended through treachery or trickery and that would have been Nebby's only hope without a means to bring his army to bear on the city. I guess Ezekiel was a lousy strategist, huh?

Well, Ezekiel was playing the odds. The other small city-states in the Mideast had fallen to Babylon fairly quickly - sometimes it was through a surrender; other times Babylon just steamrolled the resisting military and plundered the remains. Given that track record, it was a pretty safe bet that Nebuchadnezzar would do the same thing to Tyre that he had done to the other city-states.

The problem was not a lack of a navy, but a lack of a sufficient navy. sugarhitman doesn't seem to understand two things:

1. Conducting war is expensive. Not just financially, but politically - failure would send a signal that Babylon was weak. Militarily - with the army tied down in a protracted engagement, it was unavailable for other duties: defending the borders, quelling uprisings, etc. No empire would have marched its military to Tyre, intent on conquering an island city, without having a plan on how to do so.

2. it doesn't require that Nebuchadnezzar have a navy anyhow. It would only require that naval forces be present, or some alternative be used.

3. The geology of this harbor wouldn't permit a navy to operate between the land mass and the island (east side of the island).The water is less than 2 meters deep there. There is a concept called "draft", which is how far a ship sinks into the water when fully laden. In six feet of water, any warship is going to run aground on the sand and be unable to operate. However, that very shallow depth also means that it would be feasible to float (or even drive) catapults and siege towers across the water to attack the island. So sugarhitman's complaint about not having a navy is groundless, because it wouldn't have been necessary.

There's about a million things here that sugarhitman and arnoldo are overlooking.
Sheshonq is offline  
Old 02-13-2008, 11:10 AM   #222
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Latin America
Posts: 4,066
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Minimalist View Post
Quote:
Umm, any thoughts on how long Nebby's siege on Jerusalem happened, or was that a non-event?

Josephus says 18 months but, of course, he was writing 600+ years after the event and was notoriously loose with numbers of any kind.
Here is what Zekey:4 states about the siege of Jerusalem.

Quote:
“Now you son of man, get yourself a brick, place it before you and inscribe a city on it, Jerusalem. 2 “Then lay siege against it, build a siege wall, raise up a ramp, pitch camps and place battering rams against it all around. 3 “Then get yourself an iron plate and set it up as an iron wall between you and the city, and set your face toward it so that it is under siege, and besiege it. This is a sign to the house of Israel.
4 “As for you, lie down on your left side and lay the iniquity of the house of Israel on it; you shall bear their iniquity for the number of days that you lie on it. 5 “For I have assigned you a number of days corresponding to the years of their iniquity, three hundred and ninety days; thus you shall bear the iniquity of the house of Israel.
That's about 13 months if they used the same calendar we do.
arnoldo is offline  
Old 02-13-2008, 11:43 AM   #223
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: dallas.texas
Posts: 191
Default

Quote:
Sheshonq
BWAHAHAHAHA

That is not my argument, poptart.
ROFLMAO
Now that's real intelligent comment. It's apparantly your approach to every post.

Quote:
arnoldo
“Now you son of man, get yourself a brick, place it before you and inscribe a city on it, Jerusalem. 2 “Then lay siege against it, build a siege wall, raise up a ramp, pitch camps and place battering rams against it all around. 3 “Then get yourself an iron plate and set it up as an iron wall between you and the city, and set your face toward it so that it is under siege, and besiege it. This is a sign to the house of Israel.
4 “As for you, lie down on your left side and lay the iniquity of the house of Israel on it; you shall bear their iniquity for the number of days that you lie on it. 5 “For I have assigned you a number of days corresponding to the years of their iniquity, three hundred and ninety days; thus you shall bear the iniquity of the house of Israel.
That quote has to do with the northern tribe of Israel, not Judah. It has nothing to do with Tyre,which was never defeated by Nebuchadnezzer. Alexander the great was never mentioned as having used ships against Tyre. He built a causeway to the island which is still there and has turned into a peninsula.
JayW is offline  
Old 02-13-2008, 11:52 AM   #224
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Latin America
Posts: 4,066
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by JayW View Post
Quote:
Sheshonq
BWAHAHAHAHA

That is not my argument, poptart.
ROFLMAO
Now that's real intelligent comment. It's apparantly your approach to every post.

Quote:
arnoldo
“Now you son of man, get yourself a brick, place it before you and inscribe a city on it, Jerusalem. 2 “Then lay siege against it, build a siege wall, raise up a ramp, pitch camps and place battering rams against it all around. 3 “Then get yourself an iron plate and set it up as an iron wall between you and the city, and set your face toward it so that it is under siege, and besiege it. This is a sign to the house of Israel.
4 “As for you, lie down on your left side and lay the iniquity of the house of Israel on it; you shall bear their iniquity for the number of days that you lie on it. 5 “For I have assigned you a number of days corresponding to the years of their iniquity, three hundred and ninety days; thus you shall bear the iniquity of the house of Israel.
That quote has to do with the northern tribe of Israel, not Judah. It has nothing to do with Tyre,which was never defeated by Nebuchadnezzer. Alexander the great was never mentioned as having used ships against Tyre. He built a causeway to the island which is still there and has turned into a peninsula.
Yes I know. One criticism is that Tyre could not withstand a siege of 13 years. I was trying to determine if other cities similar to Tyre had been attacked by Nebby's armies. Aparently Jerusalem was attacked by Nebby and was able to resist between 13-18 months according to the sources mentioned so far. If mainlaind Tyre was located over a spring then perhaps it could last a siege of 13 years. I have no idea if the Island Tyre had access to fresh water in order to survive a siege of 13 years.

In reference to Alexander the Great IIRC he started to build a mole, was attacked, and then summonded ships from the nations he conquered (the many nations) to help protect the workers who were building the mole.
arnoldo is offline  
Old 02-13-2008, 04:12 PM   #225
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: The temple of Isis at Memphis
Posts: 1,484
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by JayW View Post
Quote:
Sheshonq
BWAHAHAHAHA

That is not my argument, poptart.
ROFLMAO
Now that's real intelligent comment. It's apparantly your approach to every post.
No, but it's my approach to people who try to post nonsense and get away with it.

If you're interested in showing us that you really want a conversation, then there's a post waiting on your response already. Use both sides of the paper if necessary.
Sheshonq is offline  
Old 02-13-2008, 05:01 PM   #226
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: dallas.texas
Posts: 191
Default

Quote:
Aparently Jerusalem was attacked by Nebby and was able to resist between 13-18 months according to the sources mentioned so far.
Jerusalem withstood one attack for three years. Even the seige by the Romans lasted long enough for people to strave.An island city could certainly have withstood an attack from the mainlnd for 13 years.

Quote:
Sheshonq
If you're interested in showing us that you really want a conversation, then there's a post waiting on your response already. Use both sides of the paper if necessary.
I'll take it into consideration.
JayW is offline  
Old 02-13-2008, 10:34 PM   #227
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Arizona
Posts: 1,808
Default

Quote:
In reference to Alexander the Great IIRC he started to build a mole, was attacked, and then summonded ships from the nations he conquered (the many nations) to help protect the workers who were building the mole.

That is correct, Arnoldo. The link I posted earlier gives Arrian's account (drawing on the works of Greek generals who were there) of the fall of the town and includes extensive naval action in the narrative.
Minimalist is offline  
Old 02-13-2008, 11:00 PM   #228
Contributor
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: nowhere
Posts: 15,747
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by arnoldo View Post
The DSS, the copious amounts of Daniel, the acceptance of Daniel as cannon, the mention of Daniel in other texts indicates that it was written before the fact.
You've made this non sequitur several times now. The frequent repetition of an error doesn't change its status. It merely shows you don't learn from your mistakes.




spin
spin is offline  
Old 02-14-2008, 06:23 AM   #229
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: georgia
Posts: 2,726
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jack the Bodiless View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by sugarhitman View Post

And when this king of kings finished conquering other states guess what he was still referred to as King of Babylon and this EMPIRE Babylonian EMPIRE. One nation, one kingdom. The greek empire took over many nations but under Alex it was the Grecian Empire (one kingdom, one nation) Roman Empire etc etc. They were not a United Nations, but individual kingdoms which subjugeted other nations but still considered a singular kingdom and nation. Oh Jack you should know better than that (what a nice rhyme). :wave:
Translation: "I, sugarhitman, again declare that Ezekiel was a liar".

Why are you defending a person you consider to be a liar, sugarhitman?
Wow great arguement!
sugarhitman is offline  
Old 02-14-2008, 07:03 AM   #230
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Latin America
Posts: 4,066
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sugarhitman View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jack the Bodiless View Post
Translation: "I, sugarhitman, again declare that Ezekiel was a liar".

Why are you defending a person you consider to be a liar, sugarhitman?
Wow great arguement!
Comedy Gold! I'm sure that the jewish rulers and the ruler from Tyre sent into exile in Babylon also thought the Zekey was a liar, NOT.
arnoldo is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:21 AM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.