FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > Religion (Closed) > Biblical Criticism & History
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Yesterday at 03:12 PM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 06-08-2006, 03:14 AM   #1
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: ""
Posts: 3,863
Default Book Idea - Weird Beliefs in Biblical Scholarship

This is a book idea developed along similar lines to Michael Shermer's Why [People] Believe in Weird Things (or via: amazon.co.uk)
Whereas Shermer examined Paranormal beliefs[UFOs], Psychics, Holocaust Deniers, Anti-evolutionists and so on
This one should focus on subjects like:
  1. Shroud of Turin
  2. James Ossuary
  3. Existence of First Century Synagogues
  4. The historicity of Biblical Partriarchs
  5. Noarchian Flood
  6. The Empty Tomb
  7. The existence of Nazareth in the first century
  8. Historicity of Pauline Jesus
Any other ideas you can think of that can be added to this list?
Any suggestions a criticisms of the idea of having such a book?
Ted Hoffman is offline  
Old 06-08-2006, 05:46 AM   #2
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Midwest
Posts: 4,787
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ted Hoffman
This is a book idea developed along similar lines to Michael Shermer's Why Believe in Weird Things
Whereas Shermer examined Paranormal beliefs[UFOs], Psychics, Holocaust Deniers, Anti-evolutionists and so on
This one should focus on subjects like:
  1. Shroud of Turin
  2. James Ossuary
  3. Existence of First Century Synagogues
  4. The historicity of Biblical Partriarchs
  5. Noarchian Flood
  6. The Empty Tomb
  7. The existence of Nazareth in the first century
  8. Historicity of Pauline Jesus
Any other ideas you can think of that can be added to this list?
Yes. Jesus mythicism.

Ben.
Ben C Smith is offline  
Old 06-08-2006, 06:14 AM   #3
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: ""
Posts: 3,863
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ben C Smith
Yes. Jesus mythicism.

Ben.
Yes, even that. There are no sacred cows. If you can devote a chapter to it, we can find some space for it. So long as you meet the following requirements:
  1. Demonstrate that a sizeable number of Biblical Scholars subscribe to the idea.
  2. Demonstrate that it is an incorrect idea or one that is not based on positive evidence.
Ted Hoffman is offline  
Old 06-08-2006, 07:32 AM   #4
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Orlando
Posts: 2,014
Default Tu Quoque

Hi Ben and Ted,

How about the notion of an historical Jesus Christ living in the first century. That should qualify as the granddaddy of all bizarre beliefs. It seems to have been introduced by the mad North African lawyer Tertullian around the year 200 and has spread like an infectious disease for 1800 years.

Warmly,

PhilosopherJay

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ben C Smith
Yes. Jesus mythicism.

Ben.
PhilosopherJay is offline  
Old 06-08-2006, 07:50 AM   #5
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Midwest
Posts: 4,787
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by PhilosopherJay
How about the notion of an historical Jesus Christ living in the first century. That should qualify as the granddaddy of all bizarre beliefs. It seems to have been introduced by the mad North African lawyer Tertullian around the year 200 and has spread like an infectious disease for 1800 years.
Hi, Jay.

Such a statement, like all statements that credit a known writer with the invention of an historical Jesus, leaves me wondering why that writer is credited at the expense of others.

Justin and Irenaeus, for example, preceded Tertullian. Justin and Irenaeus appear quite committed to an historical Jesus Christ living in century I. How then is it that Tertullian invented the notion?

Ben.
Ben C Smith is offline  
Old 06-08-2006, 09:00 AM   #6
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: NJ
Posts: 491
Default

Ted, do a "sizable number of scholars" really subscribe to the Noarchian flood?
RUmike is offline  
Old 06-08-2006, 09:02 AM   #7
Banned
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: NYC
Posts: 10,532
Default

Innerrancy itself is the weirdest idea of all.

RED DAVE
RED DAVE is offline  
Old 06-08-2006, 09:32 AM   #8
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Midwest
Posts: 4,787
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by RUmike
Ted, do a "sizable number of scholars" really subscribe to the Noarchian flood?
Or the Shroud of Turin? Maybe some ultraconservatives, but how many?

Ben.
Ben C Smith is offline  
Old 06-08-2006, 09:38 AM   #9
Moderator -
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Twin Cities, Minnesota
Posts: 4,639
Default

I would take the flood off that list (because as RUmike points out, it's not something widely believed by scholars) and replace it with the Exodus.
Diogenes the Cynic is offline  
Old 06-08-2006, 09:44 AM   #10
Contributor
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Los Angeles area
Posts: 40,549
Default

I think you miss the point of Shermer's work. These are not weird things. They are factual assertions that might or might not have evidence in support of them, which evidence might or might not be faked.
Toto is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:26 AM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.