FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > Religion (Closed) > Non Abrahamic Religions & Philosophies
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Yesterday at 03:12 PM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 10-06-2004, 01:20 AM   #11
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Brighton, England
Posts: 6,947
Default

All right, folks. The personal attacks stop RIGHT NOW. I have just had to remove some very insulting posts.
Dean Anderson is offline  
Old 10-06-2004, 02:20 AM   #12
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Pennsylvania USA
Posts: 1,773
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mordy
So why should we attempt to argue or convince people that are inherently and knowingly irrational and basically won't change because they dont respect reason or dont want to examine themselves at all?
1. Because they vote.
2. Because some of them will eventually listen to reason, and at least moderate their views.
rationalOne is offline  
Old 10-06-2004, 05:33 AM   #13
Contributor
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 14,952
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by rationalOne
1. Because they vote.
2. Because some of them will eventually listen to reason, and at least moderate their views.
Seconded.

To simply shut up and not discuss the issues is to let the REALLY scary and motivated christian lunatics start to push their agenda.

Mostly, I want the 90% of moderate, at least partially rational Christians to keep the fuckers who want to make homosexuality and blasphemy a capital offense at bay. There's also the whole evolution/science thing. And of course separation of church and state; which benefits atheists even less than different religious denominations, but unfortunately most of the Christians I run into on message boards are too stupid to grasp the concept that it's good for them and their beliefs.
Plognark is offline  
Old 10-09-2004, 09:47 AM   #14
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Admin Consensus Is That Terriers are O.K.
Posts: 1,608
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mordy
So why should we attempt to argue or convince people that are inherently and knowingly irrational and basically won't change because they dont respect reason or dont want to examine themselves at all?
Wow man -- that's hardcore.

So why should you attempt to argue or convince? And why should they attempt the same?

Perhaps it's the biggest question. And I really -- and truly -- don't know.

From the Jungles of Convincing,

Kang Louie
KingLouie is offline  
Old 10-09-2004, 10:19 AM   #15
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Winnipeg
Posts: 2,047
Default

I doubt I've ever dramatically changed anyone's opinion on the EOG. But I like to feel I've corrected some of the slander made against atheists, that we are ignoring the overwhelming evidence, and we are just rebelling against god, rather than holding what is quite reasonable belief.
-RRH- is offline  
Old 10-09-2004, 10:36 AM   #16
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: American by birth, Southern by the grace of God!
Posts: 2,657
Default

yeah, but the problem with that stance, in my opinion, is that reason is not the ultimate definer of reality. One can reasonably come to a wrong conclusion.

Ultimately one accepts what one wants to accept.

I come to "bounce" my worldview against others and test reasonability of my stance...
jdlongmire is offline  
Old 10-09-2004, 10:54 AM   #17
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Winnipeg
Posts: 2,047
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jdlongmire
yeah, but the problem with that stance, in my opinion, is that reason is not the ultimate definer of reality. One can reasonably come to a wrong conclusion.

Ultimately one accepts what one wants to accept.

I come to "bounce" my worldview against others and test reasonability of my stance...
So you still care about whether your stance is reasonable.

I know that someone who disagrees with me can think I am both reasonable and wrong. Convincing someone that I'm right might not be possible, but if they know I'm reasonable, then I can expect a small amount of respect for my beliefs.
-RRH- is offline  
Old 10-09-2004, 11:59 AM   #18
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: American by birth, Southern by the grace of God!
Posts: 2,657
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by RRH
So you still care about whether your stance is reasonable.

I know that someone who disagrees with me can think I am both reasonable and wrong. Convincing someone that I'm right might not be possible, but if they know I'm reasonable, then I can expect a small amount of respect for my beliefs.
agreed
jdlongmire is offline  
Old 10-09-2004, 02:05 PM   #19
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Belgium
Posts: 628
Default why bother

The real problem is ,that many xtians are only not murderers and rapists
because they fear their god. Take away their belief and what have you got?
Brion is offline  
Old 10-09-2004, 04:21 PM   #20
Contributor
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: London UK
Posts: 16,024
Default

I probably had too strong an evangelical upbringing and think it is my moral duty to help people see the light - little problem that it is not the light they wanted me to see!

I also feel that that commandment - thou shalt not bear false witness - is worth something, and concepts like the supernatural are false witness!

It is more a matter of showing the way than getting angry about ignorance - everyone has a brain, they maybe need to be shown how to use it, and often, the process of challenging a worldview where God is aware of every hair of your head and personally died for you is very heavy work!
Clivedurdle is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:39 AM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.