Freethought & Rationalism ArchiveThe archives are read only. |
10-31-2004, 12:02 AM | #1 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Dancing
Posts: 9,940
|
The Gospel of Thomas?
What's the history of this gospel? Was it a post-canonization forgery? Was it a gnostic christian gospel only?
|
10-31-2004, 12:13 AM | #2 | |
Obsessed Contributor
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: NJ
Posts: 61,538
|
Quote:
|
|
10-31-2004, 12:38 AM | #3 | |
Contributor
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Los Angeles area
Posts: 40,549
|
Gospel of Thomas FAQ
Quote:
|
|
10-31-2004, 01:19 AM | #4 |
Contributor
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Barrayar
Posts: 11,866
|
doubled Toto's I see.
|
10-31-2004, 09:14 AM | #5 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Birmingham UK
Posts: 4,876
|
Some scholars such as Baarda Drijvers and Perrin link Thomas to the early Syriac harmony of the Gospels known as the Diatessaron and generally believed to have been composed by Tatian.
Such scholars often date Thomas in the late 2nd century CE. Andrew Criddle |
10-31-2004, 01:50 PM | #6 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: none
Posts: 9,879
|
hmm... middle to late 2nd century, but certainly after Q.
|
10-31-2004, 02:44 PM | #7 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Waterbury, Ct, Usa
Posts: 6,523
|
Most of GThomas dates to the first century...
Vinnie |
10-31-2004, 03:18 PM | #8 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: none
Posts: 9,879
|
definitly, but there are a couple of quotes that aren't found with that time period. Maybe those were Nag Hammdi mutations...
|
10-31-2004, 03:37 PM | #9 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: none
Posts: 9,879
|
Quote:
|
|
11-02-2004, 11:30 AM | #10 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Portlandish
Posts: 2,829
|
This gospel is known from a Coptic (ancient egyptian) translation found in 1945. It's part of the so-called Nag Hammadi Library. The library itself has lots of heretical documents but in addition to that many of the sayings in Thomas belie a gnostic perspective. I don't think there is a good consensus on when it was written. Pretty middle of the road is Bart Ehrman's view that whil some of the sayings are probably quite old the work as a whole dates to the early 2nd century. His view is also that it could have developed independently of the canonical gospels.
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|