Freethought & Rationalism ArchiveThe archives are read only. |
02-03-2013, 08:27 AM | #1 | ||||
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: seattle, wa
Posts: 9,337
|
Stronger Evidence For a Mythical Gospel Narrative
I have always been suspicious of those who promote the claims about a 'mythical Jesus' because - quite frankly - the argument seemed to be entirely self-serving to those who want to make Jesus go away for personal reasons. It's the same thing when a black person tells me that Egyptians were black or Jews tell me they are the chosen people. In any event, a new line of argument has recently struck me which I thought might be interesting for those in the forum.
The mysterious figure of 'the Samaritan woman' of John chapter four has always intrigued me, mostly because I am interested in the Samaritans. She is said by Jerome to have been a Dosithean and by other Greek sources to have been named Foti (Φωτη) or Fotini (Φωτεινη) or 'enlightenment.' I couldn't help notice that when the Peshitta translates that term into Syriac: Quote:
Norea and nahira ultimately come from the Semitic root nhr 'to grow bright, shine, remember.' But are they different names applied to the same person? And if so how was it done? The figure of Norea is first referenced in our surviving literature by Irenaeus who mentions a gnostic sect who revere a woman of this name who was Seth's wife/sister. Epiphanius mentions the same woman as being the wife of Noah. He accuses the gnostics of borrowing from the Greeks (for Deucalion's wife was named Pyrrha in those sources) and also criticizes them on a number of other accounts especially the idea that this Norea could have lived from the time of Seth to Noah. Nevertheless if my theory is correct this woman was understood to have lived to the time of Jesus and more importantly to have been married to 'six husbands' - the number of 'angelic archons' directly involved in Creation according to some accounts. The relationship with the archons is already alluded to be Heracleon in Origen's Commentary on John. But more importantly Birger Pearson has recognized her appearance in the Greek text of the Acts of Archelaus. Pearson notes that the adjective ώραία is used in such a way that makes it clear that it must originally have been associated as the name of the virgin: Quote:
Quote:
This is confirmed a little further when Clement goes on to twist the original meaning of their interpretation of scripture: Quote:
But the question is how can we connect Fotini 'the Samaritan woman' of the original lost gospel with Norea the gnostic virgin? Clearly Jesus was understood to be saying that he was her true husband in the gospel. Also Ephrem's identification of her with Mary Magdala is also significant. There must have been one 'woman companion' figure who ran throughout the course of the original gospel narrative, split up into different figures. The idea of the 'virgin Mary' must also have grown out of this beautiful (ώραία) virgin hypostasis. |
||||
02-03-2013, 02:01 PM | #2 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: On the path of knowledge
Posts: 8,889
|
Yo Chili. This is one for your unique interpretational skills.
|
02-03-2013, 02:40 PM | #3 | |
Regular Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Primary residence in New York State
Posts: 231
|
Hi Stephan,
I have often thought this was actually a parable full of symbolism Quote:
|
|
02-03-2013, 07:00 PM | #4 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Oregon
Posts: 738
|
Isn't this a huge generalization? How could you possibly know the motivations of those who have concluded the evidence points toward early Christians believing in a mythical Jesus? How are they served by this view?
|
02-03-2013, 07:10 PM | #5 | |
Contributor
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Falls Creek, Oz.
Posts: 11,192
|
Quote:
To paraphrase the OP ... I have always been suspicious of those who promote the claims about a 'historical Jesus' because - quite frankly - the argument seemed to be entirely self-serving to those who want to make Jesus remain on planet Earth along with the false authority of the bible, for personal reasons such as tenure, societal prestige and the age old pressure to remain within the peer-reviewed flock. |
|
02-03-2013, 07:16 PM | #6 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: seattle, wa
Posts: 9,337
|
I was making a personal admission and then the rest of the post goes on to demonstrate that there is more to the 'mythical gospel narrative' than that.
|
02-03-2013, 07:23 PM | #7 | ||
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: seattle, wa
Posts: 9,337
|
Back to the OP. It is interesting to note that Canticles Rabbah commenting on this line:
Quote:
Quote:
|
||
02-03-2013, 07:31 PM | #8 | ||
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: seattle, wa
Posts: 9,337
|
Here is the Mandaean parallel from p 62 - 63 of Mead's translation:
Quote:
It is also worth noting that Mead points to an additional narrative in the Oxford manuscript of the same John Book: Quote:
|
||
02-03-2013, 07:40 PM | #9 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: seattle, wa
Posts: 9,337
|
The Mandaean redeemer also manages to get 'Miryai' out of the tabernacle and brings her across the Jordan, this time to Iraq:
Quote:
|
|
02-03-2013, 07:56 PM | #10 | |
Junior Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 96
|
Quote:
I always pictured egyptians as "black" people. What do you have to be to qualify as black these days? |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|