Freethought & Rationalism ArchiveThe archives are read only. |
12-19-2006, 12:46 AM | #1 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Bedford, England
Posts: 34
|
Origins of Sermon on the Mount
I'm told Gandhi reckoned SOTM the greatest set of teaching ever. Hence Jesus was one of the world's greatest thinkers.
Given that nothing Jesus was said to have preached was an original thought, can anyone point me to a web source that gives the origins of thoughts/philosophy expressed in SOTM. Failing that any help in linking any of Matthew's account to the OT would be appreciated. Thanks Rich |
12-19-2006, 04:20 AM | #2 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Colorado
Posts: 8,674
|
Well, most of the sermon comes from the Old Testament, and just re-interprets it along Hellenistic lines.
Quote:
The teachings are totally impractical, and largely nonsense and unfollowable. They contain some good pacifistic ideas, but they aren't realistic, and like all forms of pacifism, they are self-destructive, and even more the teachings from the SOTM are contradicted elsewhere in Matthew, much less the rest of the Gospels. To me pointing to the SOTM is liking pointing to a good speech by Hitler or Stalin. Its all fluff, no substance. Its like when Bush comes out and says 'America does not tolerate torture, we love everyone, and we want to help spread democracy and freedom," then they sign a torture bill into effect |
|
12-19-2006, 07:05 AM | #3 | |
Regular Member
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: USA
Posts: 246
|
Quote:
|
|
12-19-2006, 07:08 AM | #4 | |
Regular Member
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: USA
Posts: 246
|
Quote:
Yeah, it's like, one would have to be transformed from the inside out and become a completely new kind of person -or something like that- just in order to live like Jesus teaches us to live. |
|
12-19-2006, 07:37 AM | #5 | |
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 1,289
|
Quote:
Perhaps you'd quote from some of the best studies on the Sermon -- i.e, those of Betz (or via: amazon.co.uk) or Guelich (or via: amazon.co.uk) or Strecker (or via: amazon.co.uk) or even Windisch (or via: amazon.co.uk) -- or from what one finds in Davies (or via: amazon.co.uk) or Davies and Allison (or via: amazon.co.uk) or Luz (or via: amazon.co.uk) or Carter (or via: amazon.co.uk) (some, if not all, of which you've surely read given the confidence and air of informed authority with which you make your assertions about the origin and thrust of Matt. 5-7), or from any of the other works on the Sermon listed here, to back up this claim. JG |
|
12-19-2006, 09:52 AM | #6 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Indianaplolis
Posts: 4,998
|
Why must it be that Jesus is unoriginal and/or his teachings aren’t all they are cracked up to be? What is the unspoken need?
How many skeptics does it take to burry the man’s reputation? Me thinks thou doest protest to much… |
12-19-2006, 10:05 AM | #7 |
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 1,289
|
sermonm?
Can someone please fix the spelling of the header of this thread?
Jeffrey Gibson |
12-19-2006, 12:14 PM | #8 | |
Regular Member
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: USA
Posts: 246
|
Quote:
Well, you've done it... you've accused people such as Gandhi and Leo Tolstoy of being either "ignorant, sucking up to the powers that be, or simply deluded idealists" and compared Jesus Christ to Hitler and Stalin in the same breath. Impressive Besides that, I think the thread raises a good point. If Jesus did not originate the teachings in Matthew, then where did they come from? Did the gospel writers formulate these teachings somewhere between Paul and the compilation of Mark? Did "Matthew" formulate the SOTM somewhere between Mark and his gospel? What's the mythicist position on this? |
|
12-19-2006, 12:29 PM | #9 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Middlesbrough, England
Posts: 3,909
|
Quote:
Boro Nut |
|
12-19-2006, 12:46 PM | #10 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Bedford, England
Posts: 34
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|