FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > Religion (Closed) > Biblical Criticism & History
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Today at 03:12 PM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 05-07-2006, 12:30 PM   #21
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Western Sweden
Posts: 3,684
Default

The Golden Rule is disgustingly Übermensch - I know what's best for you, so I'll treat you accordingly. Being a masochist, I'm gonna hurt you all.

The Silver Rule seems to be more on the safe side: I don't know what you want, but there's at least a possibility that we have the same dislikes, so I'll spare you.
Lugubert is offline  
Old 05-07-2006, 12:37 PM   #22
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Chicago
Posts: 1,396
Default

I think Anat explained the differences perfectly. I'm also for the Silver Rule, which basically says "live and let live" and doesn't oblige one to make others happy.
Apikorus is offline  
Old 05-07-2006, 12:48 PM   #23
Banned
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: 7th Heaven
Posts: 406
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Phlox Pyros
Thanks. Yes,sort of... Tobit 4:14:
Oops...I missed it by a verse earlier.

Tobit 4:15:
Do to no one what you yourself dislike. Do not drink wine till you become drunk, nor let drunkenness accompany you on your way.
Phlox Pyros is offline  
Old 05-07-2006, 11:41 PM   #24
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Scotland
Posts: 1,549
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Anat
johno, OTOH Ahad Ha'am argues for the superiority of the silver rule over the golden one in that it is actually possible to practice it and it doesn't lead one into abandonment of self-preservation in the name of 'doing unto others'. Also, the silver rule can be generalised to relationships between groups and countries.

Then there is George Bernard Shaw's objection to the golden rule - that people have different tastes, thus the way you would be done by differs from how another would. This is answered by the platinum rule - do unto others as they would be done by.
I wasn't endorsing my schoolmaster's point of view, merely reporting it. He assumed the superiority of the golden rule over the silver one and cited christianity's assertion of the golden rule as evidence of the superiority of christianity over all other religions. In retrospect the whole thing seems a stupid argument: superiority versus inferiority. If he had thought for a while he would have seen that the central claim he was making was the christianity is true, and all other religions are false, so even if other religions taught ethics more coherently than christianity that would make no difference to their falsity. I was being taught all this sort of stuff when there was no suggestion of multiculturalism. Christianity (almost any protestant kind, but not christian science, of Jehovah's witnesses) was right and every other religion was a dangerous delusion. When we were deemed old enough, 17--18 years old, we were entrusted with our first classes on comparative religion. The title of the course book was Dangerous delusions.

johno
johno is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 06:57 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.