Freethought & Rationalism ArchiveThe archives are read only. |
03-07-2008, 10:15 AM | #1201 | |||
Veteran Member
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: USA
Posts: 6,070
|
Quote:
As I said, though, the fulfillment of a prophesy that a fallen nation would rise again is not very remarkable. Look at the old Soviet Union states. How many of those rose and fell and rose again? Whether or not Israel has been truly restored in a way that fulfills any prophesy, such fulfillment is very weak evidence for a divine origin of the prophecy. |
|||
03-07-2008, 10:25 AM | #1202 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: USA
Posts: 6,070
|
Another obvious problem with restoration as evidence is that it occurred over 2000 years after the prophecies. If you asked anybody that believed in a restoration prophecy back in that day, they would not have thought it meant 2000 years later. Just like most everybody today who says Jesus is coming again, believes it will happen in their lifetime or soon thereafter. See Mark 13:30.
If the prophecies gave a date for restoration, that would count as better evidence. If I say there will be a magnitude 8 earthquake in California someday that's not a remarkable prediction. If I give an exact date, it is. |
03-07-2008, 12:22 PM | #1203 | |
Contributor
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: nowhere
Posts: 15,747
|
Quote:
spin |
|
03-07-2008, 12:55 PM | #1204 |
Banned
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Florida
Posts: 19,796
|
Message to arnoldo: I concede for the sake of argument that God can predict the future. What does that reasonably prove about his character?
|
03-07-2008, 12:58 PM | #1205 |
Contributor
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Los Angeles area
Posts: 40,549
|
Have any of you read Sartre's No Exit? Do you know why I keep thinking of that?
I am putting this thread out of its misery. There are multiple other threads where any remaining questions can be cleared up. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|