FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > Religion (Closed) > Biblical Criticism & History
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Yesterday at 03:12 PM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 09-06-2008, 06:15 PM   #1
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Sunny California
Posts: 1,336
Default Debunking the "Politically Incorrect Guide to the Bible"

I just checked out a book from the library called "The Politically Incorrect Guide to the Bible (or via: amazon.co.uk)" and after flipping through it I don't know if I should laugh or cry at seeing what some people in this world actually believe.

I would like to know what you all think of some of these claims, if you see it as ridiculous. Then we can create a rebuttal or something.

Anyway, here are some things that this book claims...

"The Bible made modern science possible (which is why it started in the Middle Ages)."

"Contrary to what anti-religious secularists assert, far more lives have been snuffed out throughout history by faith-hating fanatics than by religious believers."

"The Old Testament is unquestionably anti-slavery."

"Without armies or force, Jesus founded one of the largest empires in history. (Even Napoleon gives him credit for such a feat!)"

There's a lot more and I can provide more details if you want.
rfwu is offline  
Old 09-06-2008, 07:49 PM   #2
Contributor
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Los Angeles area
Posts: 40,549
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by rfwu View Post
I just checked out a book from the library called "The Politically Incorrect Guide to the Bible (or via: amazon.co.uk)" and after flipping through it I don't know if I should laugh or cry at seeing what some people in this world actually believe.

I would like to know what you all think of some of these claims, if you see it as ridiculous. Then we can create a rebuttal or something.
The P.I.G series is aimed a conservative ideologues and people who believe that Fox News is fair and balanced.

Quote:
Anyway, here are some things that this book claims...

"The Bible made modern science possible (which is why it started in the Middle Ages)."
James Hannam aka Bede on these boards wants to claim that Christianity begat modern science. But even he has to claim that Christianity preserved Greco-Roman science and built on it.

But this quote makes no sense. The Bible was written or put together in the first few centuries of the Roman empire, and did nothing for science at that point. It was then kept in monasteries and read only by the clergy through the middle ages. I'm not sure why he thinkg modern science started in the Middle Ages, or what the Bible had to do with it. :huh:

Quote:
"Contrary to what anti-religious secularists assert, far more lives have been snuffed out throughout history by faith-hating fanatics than by religious believers."
Without reading his arguments, I suspect this is the usual numbers game, and involves defining Hitler as a faith hating fanatic, although he was raised as a Catholic, never excommunicated, and had alliances with the Catholic and Lutheran churches. It also involves claiming that Stalin was responsible for all of the deaths in the USSR in World War II.

Quote:
"The Old Testament is unquestionably anti-slavery."
Both the old and new testaments endorse slavery. St. Paul told slaves to obey their masters.

Quote:
"Without armies or force, Jesus founded one of the largest empires in history. (Even Napoleon gives him credit for such a feat!)"
Jesus had several armies - Constantine's army, the crusaders, . . .

Quote:
There's a lot more and I can provide more details if you want.
You will find most of his arguments addressed somewhere on these boards.
Toto is offline  
Old 09-06-2008, 08:11 PM   #3
avi
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Location: eastern North America
Posts: 1,468
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by pigb
far more lives have been snuffed out throughout history by faith-hating fanatics than by religious believers.
The second world war, with its devastating loss of life in Europe and Russia, leads some folks to forget about the loss of life in asia during that 14 year war. Conservative estimates include AT LEAST 20 million casualties in Korea, China, Indonesia, Phillipines, Burma, Thailand and VietNam. Nota Bene, 99% of those victims were killed over territorial issues, rather than "faith" or "non-faith" ideology, and none of them died at the hands of either Hitler or Stalin. The majority of the soldiers in the invading imperial Japanese army were nominally Buddhists.
avi is offline  
Old 09-09-2008, 08:13 PM   #4
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Buenos Aires, Argentina
Posts: 37
Default

What about Stepinac, Mussolini, Franco and the whole list of dictators from Latin America bearing solid ties with the Catholic Church? They count, don't they?
Crimson Glory is offline  
Old 09-10-2008, 12:28 AM   #5
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Toledo, Oh
Posts: 9,928
Default

Of cousre they don't. They are not true Christians. Duh. (sarcasm.)

Avi: I thought the majority of the Japanese army were Shintoist. Shinto was the state reiligon of Japan during that time.
Bullmoose Too is offline  
Old 09-10-2008, 11:35 AM   #6
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Louisville, KY
Posts: 18
Default

You know you're in for a treat when it quotes the Bible in defense of itself on the 3rd page. Then we get to page 5 and are treated to the whole "well, it's inspired but not inerrant...except that it was originally inerrant but now it isn't...it's just inspired...and thus kind of inerrant...except when it's not" song and dance.

The more apologists that I encounter, the more I realize that their arguments are almost entirely the same...
SkippyTheSkeptic is offline  
Old 09-10-2008, 12:08 PM   #7
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Canada
Posts: 2,305
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Funky D View Post

The more apologists that I encounter, the more I realize that their arguments are almost entirely the same...
Yes, and not much different from UFOlogists, Antlanteans, New Agers, numerologists... the supernatural/paranormal/occult always trumps logic and evidence - our brains seem to be wired this way
bacht is offline  
Old 09-10-2008, 10:06 PM   #8
Contributor
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Dallas, TX
Posts: 11,525
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by rfwu View Post
I just checked out a book from the library called "The Politically Incorrect Guide to the Bible (or via: amazon.co.uk)" and after flipping through it I don't know if I should laugh or cry at seeing what some people in this world actually believe.
You should shake your head and sigh. Once your done with that, figure out how to rip them off by selling them a book of quackery that strokes their egos and tells them they're wise for their faith.
spamandham is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:24 AM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.