FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > Religion (Closed) > Biblical Criticism & History
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Today at 03:12 PM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 10-04-2004, 12:48 PM   #11
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: The Des Moines Metro
Posts: 935
Default

I think Noah's sons had signed those virginity pledge cards in high school.
John the Non-Baptist is offline  
Old 10-04-2004, 12:55 PM   #12
Contributor
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Deep in the heart of mother-lovin' Texas
Posts: 29,689
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by JTurtle
Well I suppose since you cannot understand this then it is a fable. :banghead:
There are far more compelling reasons than the ones expressed in this thread that tell us the Noah story is a fable.

Quote:
Wait a minute........is it possible that it is TRUE, and that you just do not understand it.
Nope.

Quote:
Remember, we are living in a different time and culture.
We certainly do. We now live in a time and culture when continued belief in the literal truth of such myths is inexcusable. (Oddly enough, the belief among some in the necessity of the literal truth of such religious myths is a relatively recent phenomenon).

Quote:
Surely you must be able to agree that it is AT LEAST possible that Noah did not have to have grandkids for this story to be true.
Doesn't matter, though, because the story is not true.

Quote:
I doubt the truth of this story is dependant on whether or not Noah had grandkids.
True. There's plenty of other indications from the story that tell us it's a myth; whether or not Noah had grandkids is merely a semi-interesting observation about the myth.

Quote:
Maybe his sons had not had sex yet. Who said they HAD to have sex right away. Maybe they wanted to wait awhile, you know, get settled in their careers, make some money and the like! Why do they have to rush things just to satisfy you???????????? :huh:
I find it interesting that you remind us above that "we are living in a different time and culture", yet here you make an argument that is based on the lifestyle of our current time and culture. "Waiting a while to have children to get settled in careers, make money and the like" is a modern, largely Western/American, cultural phenomenon. A goatherder/farmer from that time and culture, like one of Noah's sons, would find additional children useful, not a burden. I doubt Noah's sons were training up to be lawyers, physicians or politicians.
Mageth is offline  
Old 10-04-2004, 12:58 PM   #13
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 2,230
Default

What I want to know is, if most people back then got married and had kids at the onset of puberty, say age 13-18, what was wrong with Noah and his sons? How would it be possible to be alive for 500 yrs and only have 3 kids? Were they also ancient by that time?

500 yo Noah and his 480 yr old celibate sons mucking out the stalls of 10,000 animals for 100 days. Nice image.
Magdlyn is offline  
Old 10-04-2004, 02:16 PM   #14
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Toronto
Posts: 176
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mageth
We certainly do. We now live in a time and culture when continued belief in the literal truth of such myths is inexcusable. (Oddly enough, the belief among some in the necessity of the literal truth of such religious myths is a relatively recent phenomenon).
Well if you say so, then it MUST be right!!

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mageth
Doesn't matter, though, because the story is not true.
Okkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkk, if you say so! Hi, this is me over HERE with my argument! :wave: What are you doing over THERE???

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mageth
I find it interesting that you remind us above that "we are living in a different time and culture", yet here you make an argument that is based on the lifestyle of our current time and culture. "Waiting a while to have children to get settled in careers, make money and the like" is a modern, largely Western/American, cultural phenomenon. A goatherder/farmer from that time and culture, like one of Noah's sons, would find additional children useful, not a burden. I doubt Noah's sons were training up to be lawyers, physicians or politicians.
When I said, "Waiting a while to have children to get settled in careers, make money and the like", I thought it was clear that I was joking. Apparently not so clear.....but to sort that out, I was only joking! :thumbs:
JTurtle is offline  
Old 10-04-2004, 03:07 PM   #15
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: central USA
Posts: 434
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Magdlyn
500 yo Noah and his 480 yr old celibate sons mucking out the stalls of 10,000 animals for 100 days. Nice image.
I think I once saw a TV show like that called "Bonanza".
Amlodhi is offline  
Old 10-04-2004, 03:28 PM   #16
Contributor
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Deep in the heart of mother-lovin' Texas
Posts: 29,689
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by JTurtle
Well if you say so, then it MUST be right!!
What I said is correct, but not just because I say so. And I'm not going to bother rehashing all the arguments against the Noah story being literal history and for the story being a myth; that's been done on many other threads.

As for the relatively recent phenomenon of the insistence on the necessity of the literal interpretation of Biblical myths like the Genesis creation and flood accounts by some sects of Christianity, I'll refer you to Karen Armstrong's book The Battle For God.

Quote:
Okkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkk, if you say so! Hi, this is me over HERE with my argument! :wave: What are you doing over THERE???
What argument did you provide for the truth of the Noah account, exactly? I didn't see one. Hint: "The Noah story may still be true even if Noah didn't have grandsons" isn't an "argument" in support of the historicity of the Flood account. And, BTW, I agree with that statement in principle; it's not the fact that the account doesn't mention Noah's grandkids that exposes the account as a myth; it's all the other claims it does make!

Quote:
When I said, "Waiting a while to have children to get settled in careers, make money and the like", I thought it was clear that I was joking.
No, it was not clear that you were joking.

Quote:
Apparently not so clear.....but to sort that out, I was only joking! :thumbs:
Too bad; what you're now claiming was a "joke" was the closest thing to an actual argument in your entire post.
Mageth is offline  
Old 10-04-2004, 03:29 PM   #17
Contributor
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Deep in the heart of mother-lovin' Texas
Posts: 29,689
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Amlodhi
I think I once saw a TV show like that called "Bonanza".
:notworthy
Mageth is offline  
Old 10-04-2004, 04:17 PM   #18
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: southeast
Posts: 2,526
Cool Other Children

Quote:
Originally Posted by Roland
According to the Bible, Noah was over 500 years old when he and his family rode the flood out in the ark. Yet, he only brought three of his sons (and their wives) into the boat with him. How likely is it that after 500 years of life on the planet, Noah would have only three sons and apparently no daughters?
The other sons, daughters, and grandchildren all drowned by the thousands.

Oh, and you are missing a strange characteristic of the ancient Jews: their firstborn were always male. Somehow they could control their sperm to produce only boy children until sufficient heirs were produced, at which point useless girls could be generated.
Asha'man is offline  
Old 10-04-2004, 04:32 PM   #19
Contributor
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: North West usa
Posts: 10,245
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by JTurtle
Well I suppose since you cannot understand this then it is a fable. :banghead: Wait a minute........is it possible that it is TRUE, and that you just do not understand it. Remember, we are living in a different time and culture. Surely you must be able to agree that it is AT LEAST possible that Noah did not have to have grandkids for this story to be true. I doubt the truth of this story is dependant on whether or not Noah had grandkids. Maybe his sons had not had sex yet. Who said they HAD to have sex right away. Maybe they wanted to wait awhile, you know, get settled in their careers, make some money and the like! Why do they have to rush things just to satisfy you???????????? :huh:
It's not false because one person says so, nor because 1 billion say so, it's false because it contradicts history, archeology, geology, and a dozen other *ologies. If you really believe it's true you can always jump in and address whats wrong with the logic/information in this thread:
http://www.iidb.org/vbb/showthread.php?t=90188

So far ALL True Believers here have shied away from even attempting to addressing the obvious contradictions of the Genesis Flood verses historical reality...maybe you will venture where none of the faithful here have dared to go...but probably not if the pattern holds true...as I've said before, it sure appears as if the True Believers fear the truth :devil3:
funinspace is offline  
Old 10-04-2004, 09:42 PM   #20
Contributor
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: nowhere
Posts: 15,747
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by John the Non-Baptist
I think Noah's sons had signed those virginity pledge cards in high school.
. . . We give you permission to screw our minds . . .
spin is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 10:51 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.