FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > Religion (Closed) > Biblical Criticism & History
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Yesterday at 03:12 PM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 02-22-2007, 08:44 AM   #11
Contributor
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: nowhere
Posts: 15,747
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by John Kesler View Post
The Jewish antecedent for John's view of Jesus is found in OT and Apocryphal writings in praise of personified wisdom.
I wholeheartedly agree with this conclusion.

Just to add a little more to make the connection even more obvious, a few more quotes:

Prov 2:6, For the lord gives wisdom; from his mouth comes knowledge and understanding. (From his mouth!)

Ben Sira 24:3, I (Wisdom) came forth from the mouth of the most high and covered the earth like a mist.

What comes forth from the mouth of god, but the logos? Wisdom was the original logos. Ben Sira goes further, making the mist that covered the earth in Gen 2:6 Wisdom, there at creation.

Wisdom was there at the beginning and instrumental in the creation itself. This makes clear the ideas in "In the beginning was the word, and the word was with god and god was the word. This was in the beginning with god. All things came into being through him and without him not one thing came into being."

But coming back to the OP, Ben Sira 24:23 says of Wisdom,
All this is the book of the covenant of the most high, the law that Moses commanded us as an inheritance for the congregations of Jacob.
If Wisdom is the logos then the logos is the law -- it is the word of god, isn't it?


spin
spin is offline  
Old 02-22-2007, 12:09 PM   #12
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: London, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 1,719
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by spamandham View Post
John links the 'word' to god himself. It seems to me you have to go through contortions to interpret this as something other than the Jewish scriptures.
A god who utters a word in order to create something is not that unusual. First, we see this happening in Genesis 1: creation is linked to god via words ("let there be light"). God didn't have scriptures to relate himself back to .

We see the same happening in an Egyptian creation myth, where Ptah speaks things into existence. To quote the Wikipedia page on Ptah: "It was said (in the Shabaka Stone) that it was Ptah who called the world into being, having dreamt creation in his heart, and speaking it, his name meaning opener, in the sense of opener of the mouth."

In An African Cosmogony Bumba vomits up the world; an extension of the concept, but things still come out of his mouth.

In the Yuki creation myth Solitude Walker speaks both the earth and human beings into existence.

Cultural supremacists can of course claim Christian influence in various places, although that is a bit difficult with Ptah.

So the idea that in the beginning there was a god who then spoke a word which created things is not unusual: the word is linked to the god and creation is is linked to the word and hence to the god.

Gerard Stafleu
gstafleu is offline  
Old 02-22-2007, 01:48 PM   #13
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Charlotte, NC
Posts: 11
Default

Philo refers to Wisdom as begotten by God:

Quote:
For you shall find the house of wisdom a calm and fair haven, which will welcome you kindly as you come to your moorings in it; and it is wisdom's name that the holy oracles proclaim by 'Bethuel,' a name meaning, in our speech, "Daughter of God," yes, a true-born and every-virgin daughter, who by reason alike of her own modesty and of the glory of him that begot her has obtained a nature free from every defiling touch. (On Flight and Finding 50-51)
Also this passage from 1 Enoch 42 is interesting:

Quote:
Wisdom found no place where she might dwell ;
Then a dwelling-place was assigned her in the heavens .

Wisdom went forth to make her dwelling among the children of men,
And found no dwelling-place :

Wisdom returned to her place,
And took her seat among the angels .

And unrighteousness went forth from her chambers :
Whom she sought not she found,
And dwelt with them,

As rain in a desert
And dew on a thirsty land
Euphen is offline  
Old 02-22-2007, 10:40 PM   #14
Contributor
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Dallas, TX
Posts: 11,525
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by John Kesler View Post
Read verse 14:
if the opening paragraph is telling us that the scriptures are the messiah, then we have entered the world of symbolism, and all bets are off. We should then be looking for what later verse mean symbolically in relation to the Jewish scriptures.

On the side, not being a scholar of any kind, my question about verse 14 would be whether or not it is a likely later addition. I don't think that's central though.
spamandham is offline  
Old 02-22-2007, 10:41 PM   #15
Contributor
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Dallas, TX
Posts: 11,525
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by GakuseiDon View Post
I'm not sure that I've ever read the Logos being associated directly to Scriptures....Here is Philo's view:
http://www.iep.utm.edu/p/philo.htm#SH11m
The link doesn't seem to work.
spamandham is offline  
Old 02-22-2007, 10:45 PM   #16
Contributor
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Dallas, TX
Posts: 11,525
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Charles Wilson View Post
This passage is stating that the coming of V and T marks the "fulfillment" of the Jewish scripture with the full backing of the Senate and Legions of Rome.

Charles
It wouldn't take much to convince me that the original gospel stories were invented by Rome for political purposes, but I'm having a hard time seeing why "the word" refers to what you are suggesting.
spamandham is offline  
Old 02-23-2007, 12:19 AM   #17
Contributor
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Los Angeles area
Posts: 40,549
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by spamandham View Post
The link doesn't seem to work.
Google cache
Quote:
The pivotal and the most developed doctrine in Philo's writings on which hinges his entire philosophical system, is his doctrine of the Logos. By developing this doctrine he fused Greek philosophical concepts with Hebrew religious thought and provided the foundation for Christianity, first in the development of the Christian Pauline myth and speculations of John, later in the Hellenistic Christian Logos and Gnostic doctrines of the second century. All other doctrines of Philo hinge on his interpretation of divine existence and action. The term Logos was widely used in the Greco-Roman culture and in Judaism. Through most schools of Greek philosophy, this term was used to designate a rational, intelligent and thus vivifying principle of the universe. This principle was deduced from an understanding of the universe as a living reality and by comparing it to a living creature. . . .
Toto is offline  
Old 02-23-2007, 06:52 AM   #18
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Saint Petersburg, Fl
Posts: 51
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by spamandham View Post
It wouldn't take much to convince me that the original gospel stories were invented by Rome for political purposes, but I'm having a hard time seeing why "the word" refers to what you are suggesting.
"The Word" is not a high level metaphysics. It is seen in the "Blind Man" stories of Jesus, esp. in GJohn.

The Temple is about to be razed and the Legions are poised for the Siege of Jerusalem. Titus is asking a "blind man" if he can "see" that destruction is coming. "I see trees, big as people, and moving" When he is "healed", he sees "quite distinctly" what is about to happen.

This is not metaphysics or a miraculous healing. "Do you see that Jerusalem is about to fall?" "Yes." "Then you are healed of your blindness."

"The Word" comes after the start of Book 3 in _Wars of the Jews_. Nero is angry over the coming loss of the eastern part of the empire. He sends in Vespasian, who brings his son Titus.

Nero dies and Vespasian and Titus kick ass and take names. "Now is the time for the Father to glorify the son for doing his work."

No Problem, Titus. Our WORD will make you a god as is our right. The eastern nations will bow down to you as they would not before. For they will soon see that our word will be made flesh.

SPQR.

Charles
Charles Wilson is offline  
Old 02-23-2007, 11:38 AM   #19
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Charleston, WV
Posts: 1,037
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by spin View Post
But coming back to the OP, Ben Sira 24:23 says of Wisdom,
All this is the book of the covenant of the most high, the law that Moses commanded us as an inheritance for the congregations of Jacob.
If Wisdom is the logos then the logos is the law -- it is the word of god, isn't it?
Yes. The OP states that, "early Christians believed the Jewish scriptures themselves to be the Messiah." I think that, as John 20:31 states, Jesus was believed to be the Messiah, and his existence and purpose came to be understood via the language applied to Wisdom, which was equated with God's word and law. Baruch 3:36-4:1 equates Wisdom with the law, and Wisdom of Solomon 9:1 states that God created by his word/wisdom:

Quote:
"O God of my ancestors and Lord of mercy,
who have made all things by your word,
2 and by your wisdom have formed humankind
Quote:
Originally Posted by spamandham
if the opening paragraph is telling us that the scriptures are the messiah, then we have entered the world of symbolism, and all bets are off.
I don't think that "all bets are off" that Jesus was believed to be the Messiah just because language applied to him was also applied to Wisdom/God's Word/Law.
John Kesler is offline  
Old 02-23-2007, 11:54 AM   #20
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 2,060
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by spamandham View Post
It seems to me, there are several tacit admissions in the writings of the New Testament that early Christians believed the Jewish scriptures themselves to be the Messiah.

I'm not an expert of any kind on ancient language or history, but am simply drawing what I think to be a reasonable conclusion based on the following.

- John 1:1-5.
1In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God. 2He was with God in the beginning.
3Through him all things were made; without him nothing was made that has been made. 4In him was life, and that life was the light of men. 5The light shines in the darkness, but the darkness has not understood it.


John links the 'word' to god himself. It seems to me you have to go through contortions to interpret this as something other than the Jewish scriptures. Why is the simplest read not simply "our understanding of god comes from the scriptures from the very beginning, and they are our entire knowledge of him. Those who don't get this are in the dark."?

- Paul refers to Logos as well. Why is this 'word of god' not literally understood to be the Jewish scriptures?

I welcome all criticism of this, as well as other similar examples.

:huh:
In the Asssumption of Moses, the dying Moses tells Joshua to anoint his writings.
And receive this writing that you may know how to preserve the books which I shall deliver unto you: and you shall set these in order and anoint them with oil of cedar and put them away in earthen vessels in the place which He made from the beginning of the creation of the world, that His name should be called upon until the day of repentance in the visitation wherewith the Lord will visit them in the consummation of the end of the days.
:huh:

Jake Jones IV
jakejonesiv is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:22 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.