FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > Religion (Closed) > Biblical Criticism & History
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Yesterday at 03:12 PM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 12-28-2011, 10:00 AM   #151
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Bellingham, WA
Posts: 186
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mountainman View Post
I think you need to do some background reading on Arnaldo Momigliano, one of the foremost ancient historians (n.b. not "Biblical" historians) of the 20th century. If Eusebius has no reputation as a competent chronographer, how can he be regarded as a competent historian? The answer is that he cannot be regarded as a competent historian.
No one is arguing he's a competent historian. What's being argued is that the fact that he's a ideologue who was selective in his sources and mixed up chronologies does not mean that he simply fabricated everything he wrote.
Maklelan is offline  
Old 12-28-2011, 02:11 PM   #152
Contributor
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: the fringe of the caribbean
Posts: 18,988
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Maklelan View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by mountainman View Post
I think you need to do some background reading on Arnaldo Momigliano, one of the foremost ancient historians (n.b. not "Biblical" historians) of the 20th century. If Eusebius has no reputation as a competent chronographer, how can he be regarded as a competent historian? The answer is that he cannot be regarded as a competent historian.
No one is arguing he's a competent historian. What's being argued is that the fact that he's a ideologue who was selective in his sources and mixed up chronologies does not mean that he simply fabricated everything he wrote.
Well, to save some time just tell us what Eusebius fabricated.
aa5874 is offline  
Old 12-28-2011, 02:20 PM   #153
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Bellingham, WA
Posts: 186
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by aa5874 View Post
Well, to save some time just tell us what Eusebius fabricated.
I think he interpolated little things here and there, but not particularly frequently. Probably the most famous example is his manipulation of Josephus' reference to Jesus.
Maklelan is offline  
Old 12-28-2011, 02:25 PM   #154
Contributor
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: the fringe of the caribbean
Posts: 18,988
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Maklelan View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by aa5874 View Post
Well, to save some time just tell us what Eusebius fabricated.
I think he interpolated little things here and there, but not particularly frequently. Probably the most famous example is his manipulation of Josephus' reference to Jesus.
Come on. Please tell us about those other "little things".
aa5874 is offline  
Old 12-28-2011, 02:35 PM   #155
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Bellingham, WA
Posts: 186
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by aa5874 View Post
Come on. Please tell us about those other "little things".
Are you not satisfied to discuss the one I provided? Are you trying to suggest I really don't know much about this?
Maklelan is offline  
Old 12-28-2011, 02:55 PM   #156
Contributor
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: the fringe of the caribbean
Posts: 18,988
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Maklelan View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by aa5874 View Post
Come on. Please tell us about those other "little things".
Are you not satisfied to discuss the one I provided? Are you trying to suggest I really don't know much about this?
Tell us about those other "little things". Everbody knows about the fraudulent TF and the interpolation in "Antiquities" 18.3.3 and 20.9.1.

You seem to know some other "little things".
aa5874 is offline  
Old 12-28-2011, 02:58 PM   #157
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Bellingham, WA
Posts: 186
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by aa5874 View Post
Tell us about those other "little things". Everbody knows about the fraudulent TF and the interpolation in "Antiquities" 18.3.3 and 20.9.1.

You seem to know some other "little things".
Yeah, but I'm kinda curious how you tackle the TF, and I think you're trying to be evasive. Let's address that first.
Maklelan is offline  
Old 12-28-2011, 03:04 PM   #158
Contributor
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: the fringe of the caribbean
Posts: 18,988
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Maklelan View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by aa5874 View Post
Tell us about those other "little things". Everbody knows about the fraudulent TF and the interpolation in "Antiquities" 18.3.3 and 20.9.1.

You seem to know some other "little things".
Yeah, but I'm kinda curious how you tackle the TF, and I think you're trying to be evasive. Let's address that first.
I am way past the fraudulent TF.

I am into Clement of Rome, the INVENTED Bishop, and the bogus letter to the Corinthians which will bring down everybody.

Once you get Clement, its lights out.
aa5874 is offline  
Old 12-28-2011, 03:13 PM   #159
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Bellingham, WA
Posts: 186
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by aa5874 View Post
I am way past the fraudulent TF.
I don't think you are. I think you're just a somewhat intelligent hobbyist who has fooled himself into thinking he's the paragon of objectivity and erudition. You have convinced yourself that the people who have committed their lives and careers to understanding the languages, literature, and cultures of the ancient Near East and the Greco-Roman world are all just knuckle-dragging ideologues, while the armchair scholars who don't understand the languages and don't actually read the literature have the real advantage. It's the very pinnacle of hubris and ignorance, and the fact that you have to dodge half of the things I say to you in order to have anything at all to say is all the confirmation I need.

Quote:
Originally Posted by aa5874 View Post
I am into Clement of Rome, the INVENTED Bishop, and the bogus letter to the Corinthians which will bring down everybody.

Once you get Clement, its lights out.
At least your objective and unbiased analysis of the ancient sources already has a clear and specific goal. Wouldn't it be a huge waste to spend all that time pretending to deal with the sources if you didn't come to the conclusion you had before you started?
Maklelan is offline  
Old 12-28-2011, 03:17 PM   #160
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: seattle, wa
Posts: 9,337
Default

Or maybe aa is quite simply mentally deranged ...
stephan huller is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 11:03 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.