FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > Religion (Closed) > Biblical Criticism & History
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Today at 03:12 PM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 12-20-2009, 01:30 PM   #1
vid
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Myjava, Slovakia
Posts: 384
Default Ignatius - short or long recension

I was looking into supposed Ignatius' quotes of gospel, and it seemed that all "solid" ones were only in the longer version.

Can somebody here give me a quick introduction to the longer / shorter version problem? Which is supported by quotes from other ancient authors?
vid is offline  
Old 12-20-2009, 01:59 PM   #2
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Mondcivitan Republic
Posts: 2,550
Default

Hey vid,

It was established quite a while ago that the shorter Greek version is likely most authentic. The longer version not only has all that additional stuff when compared to the shorter, but there are also additional letters that look devotional and not authentic.

Both Short and Long versions are to be found in the Ante Nicene Fathers series, as you probably already found out. The printed edition has a kind of basic introduction and some footnotes, representing devotional "scholarship" of the mid 19th century, but I do not think these make it into the online versions.

There is a Hermenia commentary on the Ignatian letters by William Schoedel, Ignatius of Antioch (Hermeneia Commentary Series) (or via: amazon.co.uk), Augsburg Fortress, 1985.

DCH

Quote:
Originally Posted by vid View Post
I was looking into supposed Ignatius' quotes of gospel, and it seemed that all "solid" ones were only in the longer version.

Can somebody here give me a quick introduction to the longer / shorter version problem? Which is supported by quotes from other ancient authors?
DCHindley is offline  
Old 12-21-2009, 03:36 AM   #3
vid
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Myjava, Slovakia
Posts: 384
Default

Quote:
Both Short and Long versions are to be found in the Ante Nicene Fathers series, as you probably already found out. The printed edition has a kind of basic introduction and some footnotes, representing devotional "scholarship" of the mid 19th century, but I do not think these make it into the online versions.
Maybe you mean this: http://www.ccel.org/ccel/schaff/anf01.v.i.html

I've read that: First (newer) part of introduction seems just like zealous rambling that says little, original part of introduction looks more on topic, but it cites only very old scholarly works, so I rather asked.

I also read introduction quote at Peter Kirby's site (by William R. Schoedel), which was talking about some hypothetical "middle recension", and it said shorter recension is abridged greek translation of syriac translation.
vid is offline  
Old 12-21-2009, 06:59 AM   #4
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: San Bernardino, Calif.
Posts: 5,435
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by vid View Post
Can somebody here give me a quick introduction to the longer / shorter version problem? Which is supported by quotes from other ancient authors?
This won't answer all your questions, but you might find it of some interest: http://richardcarrier.blogspot.com/s...label/Ignatius.
Doug Shaver is offline  
Old 12-21-2009, 08:08 AM   #5
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Mondcivitan Republic
Posts: 2,550
Default

Right now, almost all critics agree that the "middle recension" (shorter Greek) is the closest to any originals, with the "long recension" (longer Greek) being loosely based on the shorter Greek with lots of additions, and the "short recension" (in Syriac) are really abreviated translations of some of the authentic middle recension letters.

Language Modern ANF
     
Syriac Short Syriac
Greek Middle Shorter Greek
Greek Long Longer Greek

DCH

Quote:
Originally Posted by vid View Post
Quote:
Both Short and Long versions are to be found in the Ante Nicene Fathers series, as you probably already found out. The printed edition has a kind of basic introduction and some footnotes, representing devotional "scholarship" of the mid 19th century, but I do not think these make it into the online versions.
Maybe you mean this: http://www.ccel.org/ccel/schaff/anf01.v.i.html

I've read that: First (newer) part of introduction seems just like zealous rambling that says little, original part of introduction looks more on topic, but it cites only very old scholarly works, so I rather asked.

I also read introduction quote at Peter Kirby's site (by William R. Schoedel), which was talking about some hypothetical "middle recension", and it said shorter recension is abridged greek translation of syriac translation.
DCHindley is offline  
Old 12-21-2009, 11:26 AM   #6
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Birmingham UK
Posts: 4,876
Default

It is still worth reading Lightfoot on the Apostolic Fathers particularly the posthumous edition with his latest revisions. It has a long discussion of the Ignatian problem.

lightfoot apostolic fathers at archive.org

Andrew Criddle
andrewcriddle is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 11:16 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.