FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > Religion (Closed) > Biblical Criticism & History
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Yesterday at 03:12 PM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 05-14-2007, 02:29 AM   #1
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: the reliquary of Ockham's razor
Posts: 4,035
Default Bibliography of the no-Jesus writers

With new books popping up all the time, and with old ones being forgotten, we could use a bibliography.

Please help with compiling a list of books and articles that are roughly in the no-Jesus genre.
Peter Kirby is online now   Edit/Delete Message
Old 05-14-2007, 09:03 AM   #2
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: ""
Posts: 3,863
Default

Too lazy so I will just list two.
J.M.Robertson A Short History of Jesus
Arthur Drews The Jesus Myth
Ted Hoffman is offline  
Old 05-14-2007, 05:23 PM   #3
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: the reliquary of Ockham's razor
Posts: 4,035
Default

I have Wells's Can We Trust the New Testament?. In the first chapter, "A Revolution in Christology," Wells displays himself as being dependent on some of Doherty's key ideas. Is it possible that the classical Wellsian thesis will go the way of the dodo? Without even its founder holding to it, I would guess so.

I find that interesting, though I'm not sure what to say about it. Comments?
Peter Kirby is online now   Edit/Delete Message
Old 05-14-2007, 05:35 PM   #4
Contributor
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Los Angeles area
Posts: 40,549
Default

How can Wells be dependent on Doherty's ideas, when Doherty wrote after him? Which of Doherty's ideas?

Doherty says that he was inspired by hearing Wells speak, but is not in total agreement with him.
Toto is offline  
Old 05-14-2007, 05:40 PM   #5
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: the reliquary of Ockham's razor
Posts: 4,035
Default

Wells wrote that book and published it in 2004.

That Paul et al. speak of a heavenly Christ.
Peter Kirby is online now   Edit/Delete Message
Old 05-14-2007, 08:41 PM   #6
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Mornington Peninsula
Posts: 1,306
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Peter Kirby View Post
I have Wells's Can We Trust the New Testament?. In the first chapter, "A Revolution in Christology," Wells displays himself as being dependent on some of Doherty's key ideas. Is it possible that the classical Wellsian thesis will go the way of the dodo? Without even its founder holding to it, I would guess so.

I find that interesting, though I'm not sure what to say about it. Comments?
I have only read the five pages of ch 1. previewed, but apart from citing Doherty on pg 3 re lack of historical detail in early Christian writings, he says on pg 4
...Earl Doherty, ... hold(s) that the earliest Christian writers did not believe Jesus to have come to Earth as a man at all. I have never maintained this view.
and offers further criticisms later in the same par.
youngalexander is offline  
Old 05-14-2007, 09:41 PM   #7
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: the reliquary of Ockham's razor
Posts: 4,035
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by youngalexander View Post
I have only read the five pages of ch 1. previewed, but apart from citing Doherty on pg 3 re lack of historical detail in early Christian writings, he says on pg 4
...Earl Doherty, ... hold(s) that the earliest Christian writers did not believe Jesus to have come to Earth as a man at all. I have never maintained this view.
and offers further criticisms later in the same par.
Yup. Looks like we don't have a dodo here after all. :redface:
Peter Kirby is online now   Edit/Delete Message
Old 05-15-2007, 07:43 AM   #8
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: USA
Posts: 1,307
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by youngalexander View Post
I have only read the five pages of ch 1. previewed, but apart from citing Doherty on pg 3 re lack of historical detail in early Christian writings, he says on pg 4
...Earl Doherty, ... hold(s) that the earliest Christian writers did not believe Jesus to have come to Earth as a man at all. I have never maintained this view.
and offers further criticisms later in the same par.
It may depend on what is meant by "the earliest Christian writers"? It's a relative term.

Stephen
S.C.Carlson is offline  
Old 05-15-2007, 07:58 AM   #9
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Ottawa, Canada
Posts: 2,579
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by youngalexander View Post
I have only read the five pages of ch 1. previewed, but apart from citing Doherty on pg 3 re lack of historical detail in early Christian writings, he says on pg 4
...Earl Doherty, ... hold(s) that the earliest Christian writers did not believe Jesus to have come to Earth as a man at all. I have never maintained this view.
and offers further criticisms later in the same par.
That is correct: Wells used to believe that Paul, and the earliest Christians thought, Jesus lived (on earth, as a human) in some distant past.

Jiri
Solo is offline  
Old 11-18-2007, 07:38 PM   #10
fta
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Oceania
Posts: 334
Default

Found online at the Internet Archive: several early 20th century mythicist works.

Arthur Drews, Witnesses to the Historicity of Jesus (1912)

W.B. Smith, Ecce Deus (1913)

J.M. Robertson, The Jesus Problem (1917)
fta is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 09:46 AM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.