Freethought & Rationalism ArchiveThe archives are read only. |
11-02-2004, 07:37 AM | #11 | ||
Contributor
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: nowhere
Posts: 15,747
|
Quote:
I would like to be able to see some direct connection between what you post and the threads that you post them to, but on the few occasions I do see connections they appear to be extremely tangential. Vork is dealing with why the gospels might talk about Galilee. How is Rev 13 directly related to Galilee? How are the beasts relevant to the discussion? I don't think they are. So, why exactly did you mention them? spin |
||
11-02-2004, 12:18 PM | #12 | |
Banned
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Alberta
Posts: 11,885
|
Quote:
The transition from Galilee to Israel is what the messianic movement is all about, wherefore there will be both saints and sinners in Galilee and the difference between these two is what the first and second beast of Rev.13 describe. Both these two beast will be residents of Galilee (Purgatory we call it) where only those who are begotten from above will be succesful and Joseph was one of these. Those who were begotten from above will come from the sea and from below will come from the land (spirit begets spirit and flesh begets flesh). John 6 deals with this: "unlike your ancestors who ate manna but died" etc. were in Galilee and they died nonetheless = despite the fact that they were in Galilee. Remember here that I hold that the Gospels take place in Purgatory or from Egypt via Galilee to Israel (in Catholicism it is via the back door to Heaven with the back door leading to Purgatory). Edited to add that the concept called Galilee is an archetypal necessity or it would not be predictable. Prophets look at archetypal images to make their bold statements and we are mesmerized by them because they are archetypal (native to humans). |
|
11-02-2004, 01:13 PM | #13 |
Contributor
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: nowhere
Posts: 15,747
|
This discussion is bound to be split as not related at all to the thread, and rightly so. However, you have given more of the same and no tangible link between your musings and the thread's interest in Galilee. You go off in a tangent from going off in a tangent. We chase what you are not saying about Galilee and you're off into an Israel which is a state of mind (to take just one item), and that has totally nothing to do with the topic.
The basic problem of the thread is "why specifically Galilee?" If I can glean anything from what you have said, you don't think that there is anything to indicate specifically why Galilee. It could have been any place other than your imagined Israel so that we have the transition from not-Israel to Israel, so your musing simply have nothing to do with this thread. So, mods, away we go. spin |
11-02-2004, 01:39 PM | #14 |
Contributor
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: nowhere
Posts: 15,747
|
Now Chili, tell me why you think this series of posts has been split from the main thread?
spin |
11-02-2004, 06:17 PM | #15 | |
Banned
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Alberta
Posts: 11,885
|
Quote:
The basic problem of the thread is "why specifically Galilee?" [/quote] But there is no problem because there is only one place to go after one is born again and that place is called Galilee in the Gospels . . . which can even be a state of mind in Egypt because the Gospels are descriptive of a mental journey and not a physical journey. Isreal is not a peace of land but it is a state of mind between the Tigris and the Euphrates (eu=bright and phrates=mind) wherefore the Jews are not supposed to have a homeland lest they try to purify the land itself instead of their own mind. In Gen.2:14 Galilee is foreshadowed with the Tigris that flows east of Asshur (Eden) and once there the Euphrates will be. |
|
11-02-2004, 06:34 PM | #16 | |
Banned
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Alberta
Posts: 11,885
|
Quote:
|
|
11-02-2004, 10:49 PM | #17 | |
Contributor
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: nowhere
Posts: 15,747
|
Quote:
On what grounds do you interpret the texts that we are dealing with metaphorically to be dealing with states of mind? Would you read the story of Hezekiah's reign metaphorically as something apparently unrelated to what it deals with? What about the narrative of Ezra? Is it intended to be metaphorical for some state of mind? What about umm, Conan the Barbarian? Dr Seuss? There is a process that I cannot see you involved in: you start with a literature and extract from it the meaning that it offers in relation to the context in which it was written. You are still doing eisegesis and not exegesis and therefore I don't think there is any way for you to know what you are saying based on your starting material. spin |
|
11-03-2004, 11:16 AM | #18 | |
Banned
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Alberta
Posts: 11,885
|
Quote:
|
|
11-03-2004, 09:29 PM | #19 | |||||
Contributor
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: nowhere
Posts: 15,747
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
spin |
|||||
11-03-2004, 10:37 PM | #20 | |||||
Banned
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Alberta
Posts: 11,885
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
And here is a better one (my all time favorite), Jn.21:18: I tell you solemly: as a young man you fastened your belt and went about life as you pleased; but when you are older you will stretch out your hands, and another will tie you fast and carry you off agianst your will. Very poetic and a lovely gospel, spin. There is actually a flash-back to this passage in Revelation someplace but I forgot where. Quote:
And btw, I just read the passage where they expelled him from the synagoge because he was so angry with them (verse 29). |
|||||
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|