Freethought & Rationalism ArchiveThe archives are read only. |
07-17-2008, 04:09 PM | #1 |
Regular Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Buckeye State
Posts: 204
|
Did "Innocents" Die So That JC Could Live?
We all hear about how Jesus died so that we may live.
Is it accurate to say that the innocents in the "Slaughter of the Innocents" died so that Jesus could live? By allowing Herod to think he'd killed the messiah along with all the others, it seems to me that these little boys were offered up so that Jesus could make good his escape. . .and that it had to happen so that the prophecy could be fulfilled. Maybe I'm wording this rather clumsily, but does the above make sense? |
07-17-2008, 04:41 PM | #2 |
Contributor
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Pittsfield, Mass
Posts: 24,500
|
Maybe you're asking: How did the senseless slaughter of infants further Jesus' cause?
Or, If God values every life from conception on, how many infants besides Baby Jesus did he save from Herod's troops? Wouldn't the more life-affirming choice have been to just prevent Herod from hearing the prophecy? Or simply pull a Pharoh on him? Harden his heart to oracles and prophets so no blood need be spilled? |
07-17-2008, 04:42 PM | #3 |
Contributor
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Los Angeles area
Posts: 40,549
|
The slaughter of the innocents is just a grizzly detail in a fictional account. It didn't happen.
But if it had, you might be right. |
07-17-2008, 04:52 PM | #4 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Cortez, Colorado
Posts: 1,000
|
And what happened to all those unbaptized innocents after they died? There are those who would have us believe that they went straight to hell, since they died without benefit of baptism. So on top of being slaughtered, do these innocent souls now burn in hell for eternity so that JC might live?
|
07-17-2008, 05:24 PM | #5 | |
Regular Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Buckeye State
Posts: 204
|
Quote:
But, strictly speaking, in the context of the story, can an argument be made that they died in order that Jesus might live? Or was it instead just incidental to his life and the furthering of his cause? I feel like I might be on to something (and it's not original with me) but I'm having trouble articulating it. |
|
07-17-2008, 06:38 PM | #6 |
Contributor
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Pittsfield, Mass
Posts: 24,500
|
|
07-17-2008, 06:41 PM | #7 |
Contributor
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Pittsfield, Mass
Posts: 24,500
|
|
07-17-2008, 08:24 PM | #8 |
Regular Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Buckeye State
Posts: 204
|
|
07-17-2008, 09:27 PM | #9 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Cortez, Colorado
Posts: 1,000
|
Probably in a cave with the gang responsible for the Red Sea Scrolls.
|
07-18-2008, 09:56 AM | #10 |
Regular Member
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Texas
Posts: 430
|
Hold on, Mary and Joseph are complying with an arduous mandate for a cenus by dropping their possessions and livelihood, endangering their lives and Jesus' too, but hiding one who should be counted in this endevour? Why comply at all?
I never thought about it like that, but now it is bothering me. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|