FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > Religion (Closed) > Biblical Criticism & History
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Today at 03:12 PM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 07-28-2005, 06:28 PM   #1
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Jacksonville, FL
Posts: 72
Default 1 corinthians woman wearing veils when praying

ok i never see any women with head covered in church except maybe catholic nuns

how is it that this rule can be ignored?

it is right there with premarital sex and all that other tripe.

if the rule was meant fior the time so were the fornication and marriage rules, if the fornication and marriage rules christian women should cover there heads. when praying.
manimal2878 is offline  
Old 07-28-2005, 06:31 PM   #2
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: The Big State in the South
Posts: 448
Default

Haven't you figured it out yet? It's called "picking and choosing" what one wants to believe. Many people will come up with rationalizations for why they pick and choose, but that's what they are doing.

Boomeister
Boomeister is offline  
Old 07-28-2005, 06:40 PM   #3
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Jacksonville, FL
Posts: 72
Default

yes i realize that

but i just don't see how they can apoligize their way around this one.

it's pretty much black and white I don't really see the room for wiiggleing on this one.

But i am sure somebody will show me wrong
manimal2878 is offline  
Old 07-28-2005, 07:10 PM   #4
Veteran
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Snyder,Texas,USA
Posts: 4,411
Default

When I was a kid - 45 years ago or so - almost all women wore hats and many veils to church. And that was a Presbyterian church, one of the progressive ones. The custom may have been dying by then, though, and by 1967 (??) women were not only abandoning hats and veils but actually wearing pantsuits not only out in public but to church as well. My mother was disturbed by this until she started wearing pants, too.....
Coragyps is offline  
Old 07-28-2005, 08:02 PM   #5
Contributor
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Jacksonville, Florida
Posts: 13,161
Default

I've seen a few women in Catholic churches with headpieces, especially at the traditional Latin Mass. It's an almost dead practice otherwise.
Splarnst is offline  
Old 07-28-2005, 08:11 PM   #6
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Jacksonville, FL
Posts: 72
Default

yet the bible verse is still there.

what is there excuse not to follow it?

Come on fundies step up and answer.

I don't want to have to go to 123 christians and be told i'm going to hell for my blasphemous questions.

If you can excuse this rule as archaic and cultural then ALL of them can be excused in the same manner.
manimal2878 is offline  
Old 07-29-2005, 12:19 AM   #7
Contributor
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: London UK
Posts: 16,024
Default

Clothes .
Clivedurdle is offline  
Old 07-29-2005, 01:12 AM   #8
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Pua, in northern Thailand
Posts: 2,823
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Boomeister
Haven't you figured it out yet? It's called "picking and choosing" what one wants to believe. Many people will come up with rationalizations for why they pick and choose, but that's what they are doing.

Boomeister
My sentiments exactly. Who says you can't summarize Biblical beliefs in less than 25 words?
Joan of Bark is offline  
Old 07-29-2005, 03:55 AM   #9
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Hayward, CA, USA
Posts: 1,675
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Clivedurdle
from that site:
Quote:
The loin- or waste-cloth ('ézôr) reaching from the waste to the knee was a common dress during the Bronze II and III ages,
The original Freudian Slip? :devil3:

Take what's written there with a grain of salt. The "shirt" they're talking about is more commonly called a T-tunic, cut as either one or two pieces, no seperate sleeves. Definitely not the inset sleeves seen in a modern shirt.

Bwhaha and this bit at the end sort of illustrates how suggestable some people are:
Quote:
A few months ago I let my young son try on an old East German uniform I acquired in Berlin before unification. He was instantly transformed into a "soldier", strutting around as soldiers do. An international traveler remarked how when he wore the traditional Japanese yukata (the man's equivalent of a kimono) he found himself behaving as the Japanese do. When he was back in his suit, he found himself behaving as Europeans do. Put someone in the clothes of 19th century courtiers and they behave like 19th century courtiers.

Clothes do modify our behavior and we should never forget that. Not only are clothes expressions of our soul, but they affect our souls too. People who wear expensive clothes act "rich", and those who wear rags act "poor". When decent people put on soldiers' uniforms, they find themselves doing things they would never do in civilian attire. So stringently avoid the clothes of the "anticulture" as promoted by rock groups and listless youth, because your spirit will be changed by them. Don't wear suits because business men wear them -- the Christ's assembly is not a business organization (though many Churches are).
If a change of clothes is all it takes to make one act differently, I'd say one has some identity problems to begin with.

And if you read the whole thing through, you'll notice they still managed to avoid the issue of "should women cover their heads in church?"
Jackalope is offline  
Old 07-29-2005, 12:18 PM   #10
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Jacksonville, FL
Posts: 72
Default

http://www.christianforums.com/t1916...l#post17314227


Let the apoligies and excuses begin....
manimal2878 is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:22 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.