Freethought & Rationalism ArchiveThe archives are read only. |
02-23-2004, 10:15 AM | #1 | |
Regular Member
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: South Africa
Posts: 258
|
Bible nonsense
Quote:
Sincerely, Christ |
|
02-23-2004, 11:04 AM | #2 |
Contributor
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 14,952
|
So are you still waiting for the "evidence" of authenticity?
|
02-23-2004, 11:40 AM | #3 |
Regular Member
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Toronto
Posts: 176
|
so i dont see what ur getting at?! obviously ur not proclaiming to be a Christian, so r u saying there are contradictions in the Bible?! please, i ask u to even show me just ONE....show me just ONE contradiction, i mean since the bible is "nonsense" you should b able to come up with something right?! i'll chek up on ur reply later....peace
|
02-23-2004, 12:07 PM | #4 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Eagle River, Alaska
Posts: 7,816
|
Quote:
|
|
02-23-2004, 12:43 PM | #5 |
Regular Member
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: South Africa
Posts: 258
|
JTurtle,
so i dont see what ur getting at?! obviously ur not proclaiming to be a Christian, so r u saying there are contradictions in the Bible?! You would be correct, I'm not a Christian, I'm an atheist. Second, I brought up that quote because I think its a load of hogwash. Consider it like a case study. please, i ask u to even show me just ONE....show me just ONE contradiction, i mean since the bible is "nonsense" you should b able to come up with something right?! i'll chek up on ur reply later....peace Um, are you serious? Sincerely, Christ |
02-23-2004, 12:45 PM | #6 |
Regular Member
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: South Africa
Posts: 258
|
So in the quote I cited, how many errors can you find?
Sincerely, Christ |
02-23-2004, 01:01 PM | #7 | ||
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: England
Posts: 2,561
|
Quote:
Quote:
If you ask an apologist, they'll tell you that one of the two genealogies above referes to Mary. This can only be believed if you are willing to assume that the Bible actually means the exact opposite to what it says. Either way around, we're talking contradiction. When you've dealt with that one, you can start working on who incited David to take the census - God (2 Samual 24) or Satan (1 Chronicles 21) - funny the way even the Bible writers can't seem to be able to tell those two apart. |
||
02-23-2004, 01:12 PM | #8 | |
Contributor
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: nowhere
Posts: 15,747
|
Quote:
1) Saul died three ways, by his own hand, killed by a shield bearer, and by an Amalekite. 2) Joseph, husband of Mary, had two fathers. 3) Omnipotent God couldn't drive people out because they had chariots of iron (Jdg 1:19) 4) Matthew's double vision - a, two Gadarene demoniacs, 8:28 b, Jesus heals two blind men, 9:27 c, two more blind men, 20:30ff d, Jesus rides on two animals, 21:7 then Luke and John do a cameo with e, two angels in the tomb the other gospels all have one of each of the above. There are many, many more. I don't think the bible is nonsense, but anyone who must defend the problems of the bible narratives is ignorant of ancient texts. spin |
|
02-23-2004, 01:37 PM | #9 |
Regular Member
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: South Africa
Posts: 258
|
Greetings spin,
I don't think the bible is nonsense May I ask, why do you think the bible is not nonsense? Sincerely, Christ |
02-23-2004, 02:19 PM | #10 |
Regular Member
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Australia
Posts: 357
|
The guy you debated hasn't actually said anything. Even if his claim that the bible was written at the time the authors say it was written is true, it still doesn't mean that the events described actually happend. It looks as though he's setting himself up a little shield with the hebrew stuff. He'll probably say that words have double meaning in hebrew or the translation is dodgy if you give him a stright contradiction.
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|