FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > Religion (Closed) > Biblical Criticism & History
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Today at 03:12 PM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 11-07-2011, 05:27 AM   #21
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: San Bernardino, Calif.
Posts: 5,435
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dave31 View Post
it was the early church fathers who's own research led them to the decision to accept Jesus' birth date just after the winter solstice, not me. I guess people here aren't aware of that either.
What is there for us to be aware of? Can you show us any evidence as to what records or other data sources, relevant to the question of when Jesus was born, might have been available to the early church fathers so that they could have done any research?
Doug Shaver is offline  
Old 11-07-2011, 12:41 PM   #22
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Birmingham UK
Posts: 4,876
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dave31 View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Toto View Post
It seems to be important to Dave31 to show that the mythical Jesus was born on the solstice.
No again, it was the early church fathers who's own research led them to the decision to accept Jesus' birth date just after the winter solstice, not me. I guess people here aren't aware of that either.

The festival for St. John's Day is one of the oldest festivals of the Christian church, which is 3 days after the summer solstice. The bible itself admits in the first chapter of Luke that John and Jesus were conceived 6 months apart. That puts Jesus' birth date at Christmas. Again, I didn't do that nor did Acharya S - the early CHRISTIANS did it.
Do we have evidence for the great antiquity of St John's Day ?
This claim has been made before but without clear evidence.

Andrew Criddle
andrewcriddle is offline  
Old 11-07-2011, 06:38 PM   #23
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Bible Belt
Posts: 13
Default

Did Luke know St. John? Then he would know his birthday.

SKY
Skyler is offline  
Old 11-07-2011, 08:22 PM   #24
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Alberta
Posts: 11,885
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Skyler View Post
Did Luke know St. John? Then he would know his birthday.

SKY
He would have since he knew darkness and these two are opposite to each other. IOW, light is required to make darkness known wherefore then the white candle in the Advent wreath is a reminder of the light we once knew and so is our own baptism candle with a gliimmer of hope among the fading purple.
Chili is offline  
Old 11-08-2011, 04:07 PM   #25
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Bible Belt
Posts: 13
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chili View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Skyler View Post
Did Luke know St. John? Then he would know his birthday.

SKY
He would have since he knew darkness and these two are opposite to each other. IOW, light is required to make darkness known wherefore then the white candle in the Advent wreath is a reminder of the light we once knew and so is our own baptism candle with a gliimmer of hope among the fading purple.
Sorry, what? That is so wierd.

SKY
Skyler is offline  
Old 11-08-2011, 05:50 PM   #26
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Alberta
Posts: 11,885
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Skyler View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chili View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Skyler View Post
Did Luke know St. John? Then he would know his birthday.

SKY
He would have since he knew darkness and these two are opposite to each other. IOW, light is required to make darkness known wherefore then the white candle in the Advent wreath is a reminder of the light we once knew and so is our own baptism candle with a gliimmer of hope among the fading purple.
Sorry, what? That is so wierd.

SKY
Not really since the light of common day is an illusion no matter how bright the sun is or how dark the night can be and so is why the light was before the sun and lesser lights came to be as shown in Gen.1. So here the darkest night on which Christ was born (who they called Jesus) has nothing to do with the movement of the sun who can be bright or dim or even stop in the mind of man since it is an illusion to begin with. So it is really a matter of perception here wherein 'beyond theology' includes 'beyond the light of common day' when Christ was born wherefore then Mary led Joseph back the the state of mind he was born and there/then gave birth to Chirst . . . and will do this time and time again as perpetual virgin in Christendom.

Opposite was John the Baptist who presents the celestial light made known in life of Joseph by Zachariah and Elizabeth which made him an 'upright Jew' who so was torn between light and darkness to signify redemption of the Adamic nature that we call Original sin, and these are the two stands required in the final rout or account/confession, or final round of Samsara or final Good that so leads to the end of the world, or the end of suffering, and the end of darkness, since on the seventh day evening never followed in Gen.2:1 where realization takes place.
Chili is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 10:10 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.