Freethought & Rationalism ArchiveThe archives are read only. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
09-23-2009, 03:24 PM | #21 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: The Blue planet
Posts: 2,250
|
Quote:
Yes Luke says Take NOTHING on your journey that is also supported by Matthew. However Mark specifically points out " Take NOTHING on your journey BUT A MERE STAFF. The answer is unsatisfactory and has not relieved the problem at all. |
|
09-23-2009, 05:07 PM | #22 | ||
Veteran Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: usa
Posts: 4,380
|
Quote:
there isnt any magic in that "one significant figure" Pi=3 is wrong. if you said Pi=3.49999, rounded to one sig fig would be 3 also but even more wrong than than 2.99. only next question is now many more other errors in the perfect bible, and how big. |
||
09-23-2009, 08:46 PM | #23 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: US
Posts: 1,055
|
Quote:
Let's put it this way, I wouldn't want to be that companies accountant, that's for sure. And I sure as hell wouldn't trust that person with my cash. Okay, now back to your regularly scheduled thread. Sorry for the derail, but it seemed important to me. |
|
09-23-2009, 08:57 PM | #24 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Perth
Posts: 1,779
|
|
09-24-2009, 06:33 AM | #25 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: usa
Posts: 4,380
|
Quote:
I doubt any of us here need a basic math lesson. Did you notice tho, that Pi as derived from the bible is 3.000000000000000, to as many sig figs as you like? That the number is incorrect as in error, as in not perfect? Its for those who say the bible is inerrant. There is an error. Its about the simplest and most obvious error in the book. Why argue it? |
|
09-24-2009, 01:57 PM | #26 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: US
Posts: 1,055
|
Who cares!!!! Why are we arguing over pi? Maybe the Bible got it wrong, maybe the scribes who copied the Bible were too lazy to finish the rest, maybe God rounded up.
The point is is that even if its true that the Bible states that pi=3 instead of 3.141592653589793238462643383279502884197169399375 1058209749445923078164 06286208998628034825342117067982148086513282306647 09384460950582231725359408128 its still not importiant enough to argue over. |
09-24-2009, 02:04 PM | #27 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Canada
Posts: 2,305
|
One theory about the "mission" passages is that they reflect a tradition of wandering prophets similar to the Cynics, connected to the hypothetical Q writings. But I don't think we have to look far for OT precedents, some of the classic prophets were ascetics or rootless (eg Elijah)
|
09-24-2009, 02:12 PM | #28 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: usa
Posts: 4,380
|
Quote:
Note the previous post...."Its for those who say the bible is inerrant. There is an error." looks like the person for whom this was a problem is gone now anyway. |
|
09-24-2009, 03:22 PM | #29 | ||
Veteran Member
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Perth
Posts: 1,779
|
Gday,
You do. You keep ignoring the basic concept of the number of significant figures. Quote:
The Bible gives ONE significant figure only. The Bible does NOT give 15 significant figures. You are mistaken. The Bible implies Pi is 3. Which is correct, to one significant figure. Wrong. The Bible gives one significant figure in it's descriptions. And Pi is 3 to one significant figure. The Bible is correct here. Quote:
Pi is 3 to one significant figure. But clearly, you will never accept this simple math concept because it is so important to you to never admit the Bible is right on anything. K. |
||
09-24-2009, 03:24 PM | #30 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Perth
Posts: 1,779
|
Gday,
Quote:
Others are more interested in preaching how the Bible is always wrong. But in THIS case - the Bible is correct : it gives ONE significant figure, and Pi IS 3 to one significant figure. Is the concept of significant figures really unknown to readers here? K. |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|