bigbee

I don't know if this is the appropriate place for me to post this. Please can the guys here help organize a debate between Dan Baker VS William Craig on the resurrection of Jesus.

Dan Baker seems to be the only person I have seen debate other Christians that follow the line of Dr Craig' arguments and completely destroyed them. Why do the other atheist opponents of Dr Craig allow him to ALWAYS get away with his so called "facts" about the resurrection hypothesis which are the empty tomb, the postmortem appearances of Jesus to his disciples and the spreading of the christian faith?

Why do they always allow him get away with the so called facts, without simply pointing out to him that they are not facts but simply events that were written in a religious story? Dan Baker seems to be the only person that argues aong that line together with Hector Avalos, but Hector Avalos did not follow it up very well when he debated Dr Craig.

mountainman

See the Infidels Library: Carrier on the Resurrection




εὐδαιμονία | eudaimonia