FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > Religion (Closed) > Biblical Criticism & History
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Today at 03:12 PM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 05-04-2004, 09:18 PM   #11
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Nebraska
Posts: 591
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Legion
I'd like to reiterate the recommendation for the New Revised Standard Version. (snip)

Kirby's suggestion is also good, but it's sort of narrow in that it only covers the gospels, but on the plus side, The Complete Gospels covers many gospels, not just the canonical ones. Although, that may not do you much good in dialoguing with ultra-conservative Christians bent on converting you who don't place any weight on non-canonical gospels anyway.
For that matter, the NRSV is considered pretty 'out there' by most fundies. In fact, many fundies will automatically downplay anything other than the KJV. The God's Word and New Living are 'accepted' in the sense that they will generally not fight them too hard (when being read from, etc.), but they won't like it. The 'gender inclusive' language of the NRSV will trigger some knee-jerk responses.

Even as a semi-fundy myself, I enjoy using non-KJV heritage versions when talking to some of my 'semi-brethern'. It confuses the heck out of them cuz they've never heard of the Douay or Jerusalem versions before (mostly used by Catholics and a few other groups). These versions come from a French tradition that sorta runs parallel to the English KJV.
Madkins007 is offline  
Old 05-04-2004, 09:22 PM   #12
Regular Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: near NYC
Posts: 102
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Madkins007
For that matter, the NRSV is considered pretty 'out there' by most fundies. In fact, many fundies will automatically downplay anything other than the KJV. The God's Word and New Living are 'accepted' in the sense that they will generally not fight them too hard (when being read from, etc.), but they won't like it. The 'gender inclusive' language of the NRSV will trigger some knee-jerk responses.

Even as a semi-fundy myself, I enjoy using non-KJV heritage versions when talking to some of my 'semi-brethern'. It confuses the heck out of them cuz they've never heard of the Douay or Jerusalem versions before (mostly used by Catholics and a few other groups). These versions come from a French tradition that sorta runs parallel to the English KJV.
Yeah, good point. An NRSV is not going to get you anywhere with a fundy group either. lol Mentioning the Jesus Seminar (if they are educated enough to know what that is) will cause them to tune you out faster than anything though.
Legion is offline  
Old 05-05-2004, 10:59 AM   #13
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: SoCal USA
Posts: 7,737
Default

Thank you very much for your responses. One other thing I'd like to know about are companion books. I think it would be helpful to tackle this personal project if I had a companion type book for whatever plain English Bible I eventually decide on.
I understand that many bibles have excellent annotations and whatnot but in your collective experiences, is that enough to study with?
All responses are much appreciated. Thanks.
HaysooChreesto! is offline  
Old 05-05-2004, 11:08 AM   #14
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: the reliquary of Ockham's razor
Posts: 4,035
Default

Don't overlook the Recommended Reading & Reference.

The Oxford Bible Commentary is a very good investment.

best,
Peter Kirby
Peter Kirby is online now   Edit/Delete Message
Old 05-05-2004, 11:18 AM   #15
Regular Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: near NYC
Posts: 102
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lamma
Thank you very much for your responses. One other thing I'd like to know about are companion books. I think it would be helpful to tackle this personal project if I had a companion type book for whatever plain English Bible I eventually decide on.
I understand that many bibles have excellent annotations and whatnot but in your collective experiences, is that enough to study with?
All responses are much appreciated. Thanks.
No, annotations are not enough, but as far as a Bible goes, an annotated one is a great start. As far as one-volume commentaries, Peter recommended the Oxford Bible Commentary which is very good, so is the HarperCollins Bible Commentary.
Legion is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:13 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.