Freethought & Rationalism ArchiveThe archives are read only. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
07-01-2007, 09:04 AM | #1 | ||||||
Banned
Join Date: May 2007
Location: UK
Posts: 1,918
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
||||||
07-01-2007, 09:16 AM | #2 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Prague, Czech Republic
Posts: 965
|
Okay, Clouseau, where are the commandments? (And I am not talking about generalities like "you shall love your neighbor like yourself".)
Mike Rosoft |
07-01-2007, 09:46 PM | #3 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Colorado
Posts: 1,037
|
|
07-02-2007, 04:50 AM | #4 |
Banned
Join Date: May 2007
Location: UK
Posts: 1,918
|
|
07-02-2007, 05:05 AM | #5 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Colorado
Posts: 1,037
|
Quote:
You'd think that for a book that is supposed to be the basis for morality, it would at least mention that the concept of owning another human being as property is wrong. This is a derail, but if you'd like to discuss it further, we can always start a new thread. |
|
07-02-2007, 05:08 AM | #6 |
Banned
Join Date: May 2007
Location: UK
Posts: 1,918
|
|
07-02-2007, 05:47 AM | #7 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: N/A
Posts: 4,370
|
|
07-02-2007, 05:51 AM | #8 |
Banned
Join Date: May 2007
Location: UK
Posts: 1,918
|
Sorry, you can't pop down to the Benefits Centre.
|
07-02-2007, 03:10 PM | #9 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Colorado
Posts: 1,037
|
Quote:
The point is, that regardless of anyone's wishes, the bible never explicitly prohibits slavery, which many wish it did. Whether I would prefer it to death, or whether it was seen as a less evil option at the time are irrelevant. |
|
07-02-2007, 03:30 PM | #10 | ||
Banned
Join Date: May 2007
Location: UK
Posts: 1,918
|
Quote:
'That doesn't make it right.'? That is your opinion? Or not? Quote:
|
||
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|