FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Philosophy & Religious Studies > Philosophy
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Yesterday at 03:12 PM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 02-26-2007, 09:01 AM   #1
Banned
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Ontario, CANADA
Posts: 583
Default Most influential philosopher of all time

Who would it be? Is it Plato or someone more recent? I'm just interested in finding out.
TheBob is offline  
Old 02-26-2007, 09:11 AM   #2
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Edmonton
Posts: 5,679
Default

I vote for Spinoza, who:
  • demolished medieval scholasticism
  • restored pre-Socratic naturalism
  • integrated materialism and idealism
  • established the rational basis for the natural sciences, including the human sciences

Everything in philosophy since Spinoza is either:
  • ignorance of his thought
  • rebellion against his thought
  • development of his thought
No Robots is offline  
Old 02-26-2007, 09:20 AM   #3
Contributor
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: USA
Posts: 34,421
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TheBob View Post
Who would it be? Is it Plato or someone more recent? I'm just interested in finding out.
There is no philosopher who is the most influential philosopher, although there have been a lot of very influential philosophers, certainly among them, Plato. More recent philosophers have, of course, also been very influential, but since they are more recent, it is probable that they have influenced fewer philosopher, although we also have to take into consideration that the number of philosophers to be influenced is greater now than it has been before. There are, I understand, an estimated 26,000 professional philosophers in the West at this time.

Among the most influential recent (last 100 years or so) in the West would be (IMO and in no particular order of merit or influence) Bertrand Russell, G.E. Moore, Ludwig Wittgenstein, Jean Paul Sartre, Albert Camus, Gottlob Frege, Martin Heidegger, Edmund Husserl, A. J. Ayer, and Rudolf Carnap, Gilbert Ryle, J.L.Austin W.V.O Quine, Hillary Putnam, Saul Kripke, Donald Davidson, Daniel Dennett. I imagine that others have different views. But, remember, we are not talking about merit, only influence.
kennethamy is offline  
Old 02-26-2007, 09:25 AM   #4
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Alberta
Posts: 11,885
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by kennethamy View Post
Among the most influential recent (last 100 years or so) in the West would be (IMO and in no particular order of merit or influence) Bertrand Russell,
I actually though that Bertrand Russell was a historian. Close enough, maybe?
Chili is offline  
Old 02-26-2007, 09:35 AM   #5
Contributor
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: USA
Posts: 34,421
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chili View Post
I actually though that Bertrand Russell was a historian. Close enough, maybe?
Not close. He was a logician of the first order (the co-author of Principia Mathematica which founded modern mathematical logic. His Inquiry into Meaning and Truth (Lectures at Harvard) are seminal readings in the philosophy of language. His famous "theory of descriptions" solved a number of philosophical problems, among them, the problem of negative existentials, and presented a theory of the meaning of the idea of existence which seems to me, true. His book on the philosophy of Leibniz was the standard interpretation of Leibniz up to very recently. With G.E. Moore, Russell broke the back of the accepted British philosophy at the beginning of the 20th century, objective Idealism. And much more than I can remember right now, and too much even to list. He was one of the dominant Western philosophers of the 20th century, and probably one of the 10 most dominant philosophers who ever lived.
kennethamy is offline  
Old 02-26-2007, 09:37 AM   #6
Banned
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Ontario, CANADA
Posts: 583
Default

Spinoza sounds pretty interesting No Robots. Thanks.

Ken, yes I agree. We are talking about influence and not merit. I am actually very interested in learning about Heidegger. I picked up a biography about him at the library called, "Beyond Good and Evil". I heard that he began where Husserl left off, would that be right? I have a basic knowledge of Sartre if I remember correctly. I'll have to look up the others. Thank you.
TheBob is offline  
Old 02-26-2007, 09:50 AM   #7
Banned
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Holland
Posts: 558
Default

I vote for Nietzsche.
Daan is offline  
Old 02-26-2007, 09:51 AM   #8
Contributor
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: USA
Posts: 34,421
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TheBob View Post
Spinoza sounds pretty interesting No Robots. Thanks.

Ken, yes I agree. We are talking about influence and not merit. I am actually very interested in learning about Heidegger. I picked up a biography about him at the library called, "Beyond Good and Evil". I heard that he began where Husserl left off, would that be right? I have a basic knowledge of Sartre if I remember correctly. I'll have to look up the others. Thank you.
You'd have to ask others about Heidegger. As for his personal relation with Husserl, who was his teacher, and to whom he owed his rise in German academia, when Heidegger became a member of the Nazi Party, and gave propaganda speeches for the Nazi's, he also made sure that Husserl was dismissed from his academic teaching job, and could never teach again. Husserl was, I believe, a Jew.
kennethamy is offline  
Old 02-26-2007, 09:59 AM   #9
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Prague, Czech Rep.
Posts: 5,130
Default

Hey, how come no one voted for me?
Preno is offline  
Old 02-26-2007, 10:41 AM   #10
Banned
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: US Citizen (edited)
Posts: 1,948
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by No Robots View Post
I vote for Spinoza, who:
  • demolished medieval scholasticism
  • restored pre-Socratic naturalism
  • integrated materialism and idealism
  • established the rational basis for the natural sciences, including the human sciences

Everything in philosophy since Spinoza is either:
  • ignorance of his thought
  • rebellion against his thought
  • development of his thought

I vote for Aristotle as having been most influential -- in all the subjects he treated of, and on the largest number of intellectuals. (Here we are not talking about the merits of his philosophy, of course.)

I am familiar with Spinoza's thought, at least with his major work, and so I have the impression that every belief of yours about him which you stated is false.

As I am quite interested in the history of philosophy, I would appreciate some detailed information about the 4 things he allegedly accomplished.
Amedeo is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:36 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.