![]() |
Freethought & Rationalism ArchiveThe archives are read only. |
![]() |
#1 |
Banned
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Ontario, CANADA
Posts: 583
|
![]()
Who would it be? Is it Plato or someone more recent? I'm just interested in finding out.
|
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Edmonton
Posts: 5,679
|
![]()
I vote for Spinoza, who:
Everything in philosophy since Spinoza is either:
|
![]() |
![]() |
#3 | |
Contributor
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: USA
Posts: 34,421
|
![]() Quote:
Among the most influential recent (last 100 years or so) in the West would be (IMO and in no particular order of merit or influence) Bertrand Russell, G.E. Moore, Ludwig Wittgenstein, Jean Paul Sartre, Albert Camus, Gottlob Frege, Martin Heidegger, Edmund Husserl, A. J. Ayer, and Rudolf Carnap, Gilbert Ryle, J.L.Austin W.V.O Quine, Hillary Putnam, Saul Kripke, Donald Davidson, Daniel Dennett. I imagine that others have different views. But, remember, we are not talking about merit, only influence. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Banned
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Alberta
Posts: 11,885
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Contributor
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: USA
Posts: 34,421
|
![]()
Not close. He was a logician of the first order (the co-author of Principia Mathematica which founded modern mathematical logic. His Inquiry into Meaning and Truth (Lectures at Harvard) are seminal readings in the philosophy of language. His famous "theory of descriptions" solved a number of philosophical problems, among them, the problem of negative existentials, and presented a theory of the meaning of the idea of existence which seems to me, true. His book on the philosophy of Leibniz was the standard interpretation of Leibniz up to very recently. With G.E. Moore, Russell broke the back of the accepted British philosophy at the beginning of the 20th century, objective Idealism. And much more than I can remember right now, and too much even to list. He was one of the dominant Western philosophers of the 20th century, and probably one of the 10 most dominant philosophers who ever lived.
|
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Banned
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Ontario, CANADA
Posts: 583
|
![]()
Spinoza sounds pretty interesting No Robots. Thanks.
Ken, yes I agree. We are talking about influence and not merit. I am actually very interested in learning about Heidegger. I picked up a biography about him at the library called, "Beyond Good and Evil". I heard that he began where Husserl left off, would that be right? I have a basic knowledge of Sartre if I remember correctly. I'll have to look up the others. Thank you. |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Banned
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Holland
Posts: 558
|
![]()
I vote for Nietzsche.
|
![]() |
![]() |
#8 | |
Contributor
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: USA
Posts: 34,421
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Prague, Czech Rep.
Posts: 5,130
|
![]()
Hey, how come no one voted for me?
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 | |
Banned
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: US Citizen (edited)
Posts: 1,948
|
![]() Quote:
I vote for Aristotle as having been most influential -- in all the subjects he treated of, and on the largest number of intellectuals. (Here we are not talking about the merits of his philosophy, of course.) I am familiar with Spinoza's thought, at least with his major work, and so I have the impression that every belief of yours about him which you stated is false. As I am quite interested in the history of philosophy, I would appreciate some detailed information about the 4 things he allegedly accomplished. |
|
![]() |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|