FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Science & Skepticism > Science Discussions
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Yesterday at 03:12 PM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 03-01-2007, 07:34 PM   #41
Obsessed Contributor
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Not Mayaned
Posts: 96,752
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Casper View Post
We just recently witnessed a massive event like this on Jupiter. While the circumstances are different (gas giant) it definitely provides evidence for such collisions.

In fact, what evidence can you provide that large object impacts don't happen? Quit trolling praxeus, it doesn't suit you.
The biggest piece of Shoemaker-Levy hit with an energy of 6,000,000,000,000 tons of TNT. Not as big as the dinosaur-killer but it would have been a *MAJOR* disaster for the human race.
Loren Pechtel is offline  
Old 03-02-2007, 04:51 AM   #42
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Queens, NY
Posts: 2,293
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Loren Pechtel
The biggest piece of Shoemaker-Levy hit with an energy of 6,000,000,000,000 tons of TNT. Not as big as the dinosaur-killer but it would have been a *MAJOR* disaster for the human race.
Does anyone have a number for the energy of the proposed moon-creation collision?

Would they also do they go into the physics of a collision with molten rock ?
Apparently the idea is that the collision throws off solid-enough chunks yet the molten surface of the earth heals itself "without a trace" ? And the life-forming processes had not begun until after this spinoff ?

When I get a little chance I will go through whatever science material is
actually linked to in the posts (an "animation" is not really deep). I find the
issue fascinating and the 'skeptical' approach entertaining.

Shalom,
Steven Avery
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Messianic_Apologetic
Steven Avery is offline  
Old 03-02-2007, 05:11 AM   #43
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: USA
Posts: 3,440
Default

In such an impact I doubt there was much "solid", it was all molten, thus there would be no "scar", only what's been presented above as far as what we see from the makeup of the earth and the moon, suggesting the moon is thrown off lighter crustal material. Looking at both Venus and Mars, they have much thicker crusts, which prevent any continental movement, something vital to our biosphere. Another thing I don't think mentioned, the circular orbit, outwards motion, and locked rotation of the moon also suggests it being once connected to the earth, and not captured.
Rhaedas is offline  
Old 03-02-2007, 05:20 AM   #44
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Paris
Posts: 8,473
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Loren Pechtel View Post
Head down to the lake, throw a big stone in. Note that it leaves no scar on the surface of the water. Therefore we can conclude you didn't really throw the stone in.
That's a superb analogy. I was struggling for an explanation which involved less than 500 words.
Nialler is offline  
Old 03-02-2007, 06:53 AM   #45
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Cadiz, Spain
Posts: 429
Default

I find that magically leaving no scar on the surface of the moon after splitting and rejoining it, or avoiding any effect on the earth are about as difficult as magically splitting the moon in the first place.

if you see any inconsistency on a sacred text, the answer is always "a wizard God did it"
DeLurking is offline  
Old 03-02-2007, 08:18 AM   #46
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: transatlantically challenged (UK/canada)
Posts: 2,688
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by praxeus View Post

Apparently the idea is that the collision throws off solid-enough chunks yet the molten surface of the earth heals itself "without a trace" ?
its molten. you cant leave a crater on a molten surface.
Quote:
Originally Posted by praxeus View Post
And the life-forming processes had not begun until after this spinoff ?
nope. it would have happened at a good 4.5Ga, and the most optimistic estimates for the beginning of life are at 4Ga.
Ezkerraldean is offline  
Old 03-02-2007, 08:25 PM   #47
Obsessed Contributor
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Not Mayaned
Posts: 96,752
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by praxeus View Post
[COLOR="Navy"]Does anyone have a number for the energy of the proposed moon-creation collision?
You'll need a lot more zeroes. I don't recall how many.

Quote:
Would they also do they go into the physics of a collision with molten rock ?
Apparently the idea is that the collision throws off solid-enough chunks yet the molten surface of the earth heals itself "without a trace" ? And the life-forming processes had not begun until after this spinoff ?
False assumption! There's no reason the bits that get thrown off have to be solid. After an event like that the splash will be liquid.

And the hit occured back before things were stable enough for life to form.
Loren Pechtel is offline  
Old 03-02-2007, 11:36 PM   #48
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Kahaluu, Hawaii
Posts: 6,400
Default

When the collision occurred, yes, there probably was a good sized hole in the planet, whether it was liquid or solid. As noted, the resulting heat of the collision would have melted the surface of the earth and down to a considerable depth. We are talking about extremely large masses moving at very high speeds. Certainly the material ejected into orbit was liquid and even gaseous. Again, its hard for us to imagine energies so great that trillions of tons of rock would be vaporized into gases. So there would be no scars on the resulting body that became the moon. You also have to remember it didn't just fly out there and become the moon. It may have taken tens of thousands of years to consolidate.

Back on earth, there was likely a massive crater, perhaps 3000 to 4000 kilometers across and maybe 1000 to 2000 kilometers deep in the planet as well as the sphere itself being significantly misshapen. However, the surface would have melted and in addition to the ejected materials falling back into the hole, substantial portions of the surface would slide in as well. There would also be the rebound effect of the compressed core regaining its shape. Additionally, large masses, particularly molten masses, but even solid masses, redistribute their mass gravitationally to become spherical. All in all, the scar would have been healed without a trace. There is also the tectonic effects of the last 4.5 billion years which would go a very long ways to erase evidence of such a scar.

Look at the Vredefort crater from 2 bya. Think of what it will look like in another 2.5 by. There may not be anything left.
RAFH is offline  
Old 03-03-2007, 07:44 AM   #49
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: US
Posts: 3,949
Default

Hmmmm....

This thread wandered from the claim of Mohammad splitting the moon 1,400 years ago, to the formation of the moon, some 4 billion years ago.
TheBear is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 02:05 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.