FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > Religion (Closed) > Biblical Criticism & History
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Yesterday at 03:12 PM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 03-28-2011, 09:45 AM   #11
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Orlando
Posts: 2,014
Default Knute Rockne's Outrageous Lies

Hi Rusty Venture,

Exactly, the Reagan/Rocky/Gipp story is not fully explained, but referred to occasionally, so it dances ever so lightly in the ideological background connecting football to politics to religion in a mystical fashion.

That Gipp was a gambler, pool hustler, poor student, smoked and constantly broke training rules is well known, but Knute Rockne's perchance for telling outrageous lies is most often covered up. It does not fit the Football Saint Rockne mold. Here's a particularly egregious example from Sport's Illustrated:

Quote:
When Rockne's literary excesses are pointed out to his former players, they tend to dismiss them with a knowing smile as they recall what a ham their coach could be. James (Sleepy Jim) Crowley, the left half of the Four Horsemen quartet, an able coach and a wag in his own right, recalls, "We used to love to go to practice because Rock was such a character. His pep talks depended on the importance of the game. I only recall his giving a few.

"One involved a telegram from his little boy, Billy, before the Georgia Tech game in 1922. Rockne probably sent the wire himself. He came into the locker room with a bunch of telegrams from prominent alumni and said to us, 'I have one wire here, boys, that probably doesn't mean much to you, but it does to me. It's from my poor sick little boy, Billy, who is critically ill in the hospital.'

"Rock was a great actor," Crowley adds as he remembers the moment. "He got a lump in his throat and his lips began to tremble as he read Billy's wire: 'I want Daddy's team to win.' We won the 1922 Georgia Tech game for Billy, and when we got home we found out that Billy hadn't been sick at all. There was a big crowd to meet us at the station, and running around in front of everyone was 'sick' little Billy Rockne, looking healthy enough for a Pet Milk ad.
That a man would lie about the health of his own child in such a manner tells us a great deal about the moral character of the man.

Warmly,

Philosopher Jay


Quote:
Originally Posted by Rusty Venture View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Frankencaster View Post
Since few out of the USA has a clue about what you are writing about, then 'no', it's not a good model.

Jesus became famous rather quickly in most of known western civilization. His legend wasn't restricted to his roots but spread across language, cutures. Jesus never really caught on among the Jews beyond a few localized followers.

There is obviously a missing variable

What is that variable?
I think it's a good analogy (and an entertaining read!). A good analogy doesn't have to be exactly point by point. Gipp did become a legend in college football in the U.S. and almost nowhere will you ever find a critical examination of how and why that came about, what's true, and what's not true, and what the actual background of the story is.

If one grows up appreciating college football then they will read about the Knute Rockne and George Gipp story, with the legend being told rather than the actual facts. I think it's fairly comparable to Sunday school for kids. And as a child becomes an adult, when prompted to think about Rockne/Gipp they'll think of the legend as fact rather than a glorification of events with some fabrication thrown in. They think that it happened the way they were told and that's that. To me that sounds very similar to God belief.
PhilosopherJay is offline  
Old 03-28-2011, 12:29 PM   #12
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: England
Posts: 2,527
Default

Philosopher Jay

Here is a chart referencing two historical figures that the gospel storyline, re JC, is more likely than not drawing upon for inspiration....
Two historical figures that have been 'lost' via the creation of the literary JC gospel construct.

GOSPEL STORY:MYTH HISTORY
John 1:43-44 -
43 The next day Jesus decided to leave for Galilee. Finding Philip, he said to him, “Follow me.” (Philip the Tetrarch) "He also advanced the village Bethsaids, situate at the lake of Gennesareth, unto the dignity of a city, both by the number of inhabitants it contained, and its other grandeur, and called it by the name of Julias, the same name with Caesar's daughter". (Ant.18.ch.2)
44 Philip, like Andrew and Peter, was from the town of Bethsaida. The numismatist A. Kindler suggested that Josephus may be wrong and that Livia/Julia the wife would lie behind this dedication dated to 30/31 CE. Following Kindler, the archaeologists and theologians currently operating at etTell-identified by them as the site of Bethsaida-Julias-have produced many papers accusing Josephus of error:.
- http://cat.inist.fr/?aModele=afficheN&cpsidt=20769141
Mark 8:27.”Jesus and his disciples went on to the villages around Caesarea Philippi. On the way he asked them, “Who do people say I am?” Philip also had built Paneas, a city at the fountains of Jordan, he named it Cesarea”. (Ant.18.ch.2)
Mark 3:6-8 Jesus withdrew with his disciples to the lake, and a large crowd from Galilee followed. When they heard about all he was doing, many people came to him from Judea, Jerusalem, Idumea, and the regions across the Jordan and around Tyre and Sidon. (Philip) “...he used to make his progress with a few chosen friends; his tribunal also, on which he sat in judgement, followed him in his progress; and when any one met him who wanted his assistance, he made no delay, but had his tribunal sat down immediately, wheresoever he happened to be, and sat down upon it, and heard his complaint;” Ant.18. ch.4
Luke 3.1 “In the fifteenth year of Tiberius Caesar”.29/30 CE "About this time it was that Philip, Herod's brother departed this life, in the twentieth year of the reign of Tiberius”.Ant,18.ch.4. 33/34 CE
3 year ministry in gJohn = 33 CE crucifixion. = 70 years from 37 BC 37 BC =Antigonus II Mattathias: Wikepedia footnote:” Josephus merely says that Marc Antony beheaded King Antigonus. Antiquities, XV 1:2 (8-9). Roman historian Dio Cassius says scouraged, crucified then put to death. See The University Magazine and Free Review, Volume 2 edited by John Mackinnon Robertson and G. Astor Singer (Nabu Press, 2010) at page 13. Merging the material from Josephus and Dio Cassius leads to the conclusion that Antigonus was scourged, crucified, and beheaded.”
maryhelena is online now  
Old 03-29-2011, 12:02 AM   #13
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: England
Posts: 2,527
Default

Hi, Philosopher Jay
I've added a little more at the end of my chart. Actually, there is even more that could be added but that starts to make things more complicated - and hence requires much more space than a chart allows for.

(For instance I think that Philip did not die when our present copies of Josephus state so - earlier printed copies have a different date - which does not actually take away from the points made in the chart, ie death of JC can likewise be moved on a bit. I have posted elsewhere on this forum re Philip becoming Agrippa I - which would, interestingly, fit in with the JC resurrection storyline where the disciples did not recognize him after the resurrection - well sort of as goes the storyline...)

Basically, what all this does, re the gospel JC storyline, is just that - follow the story - a bit like in any suspicious circumstance - follow the money - so with JC - follow the story. - and don't trip up on any verbal stones on the money trail...

(note: for Stephan Huller - my theory re Philip and Agrippa I has had an update - which might well surprise and please you - but will only update another time..... )

GOSPEL STORY:MYTH HISTORY
John 1:43-44 -
43 The next day Jesus decided to leave for Galilee. Finding Philip, he said to him, “Follow me.” (Philip the Tetrarch) "He also advanced the village Bethsaids, situate at the lake of Gennesareth, unto the dignity of a city, both by the number of inhabitants it contained, and its other grandeur, and called it by the name of Julias, the same name with Caesar's daughter". (Ant.18.ch.2)
44 Philip, like Andrew and Peter, was from the town of Bethsaida. The numismatist A. Kindler suggested that Josephus may be wrong and that Livia/Julia the wife would lie behind this dedication dated to 30/31 CE. Following Kindler, the archaeologists and theologians currently operating at etTell-identified by them as the site of Bethsaida-Julias-have produced many papers accusing Josephus of error:.
- http://cat.inist.fr/?aModele=afficheN&cpsidt=20769141
Mark 8:27.”Jesus and his disciples went on to the villages around Caesarea Philippi. On the way he asked them, “Who do people say I am?” Philip also had built Paneas, a city at the fountains of Jordan, he named it Cesarea”. (Ant.18.ch.2)
Mark 3:6-8 Jesus withdrew with his disciples to the lake, and a large crowd from Galilee followed. When they heard about all he was doing, many people came to him from Judea, Jerusalem, Idumea, and the regions across the Jordan and around Tyre and Sidon. (Philip) “...he used to make his progress with a few chosen friends; his tribunal also, on which he sat in judgement, followed him in his progress; and when any one met him who wanted his assistance, he made no delay, but had his tribunal sat down immediately, wheresoever he happened to be, and sat down upon it, and heard his complaint;” Ant.18. ch.4
Luke 3.1 “In the fifteenth year of Tiberius Caesar”.29/30 CE "About this time it was that Philip, Herod's brother departed this life, in the twentieth year of the reign of Tiberius”.Ant,18.ch.4. 33/34 CE
3 year ministry in gJohn = 33 CE crucifixion. = 70 years from 37 BC 37 BC =Antigonus II Mattathias: Wikepedia footnote:” Josephus merely says that Marc Antony beheaded King Antigonus. Antiquities, XV 1:2 (8-9). Roman historian Dio Cassius says scouraged, crucified then put to death. See The University Magazine and Free Review, Volume 2 edited by John Mackinnon Robertson and G. Astor Singer (Nabu Press, 2010) at page 13. Merging the material from Josephus and Dio Cassius leads to the conclusion that Antigonus was scourged, crucified, and beheaded.”
Matthew 27.57-59. "As evening approached, there came a rich man from Arimathea, named Joseph, who had himself become a disciple of Jesus. Going to Pilate, he asked for Jesus’ body, and Pilate ordered that it be given to him. Joseph took the body, wrapped it in a clean linen cloth, and placed it in his own new tomb that he had cut out of the rock. He rolled a big stone in front of the entrance to the tomb and went away". -
Isaiah 53.9. "He was assigned a grave with the wicked, and with the rich in his death. (Philip) ”... He died at Julias; and when he was carried to that monument which he had already erected for himself beforehand, he was buried with great pomp”. Ant.18.ch.4
John 4:14. “...but whoever drinks the water I give them will never thirst. Indeed, the water I give them will become in them a spring of water welling up to eternal life.” ”...And as this origin of Jordan was formerly not known, it was discovered so to be when Philip was tetrarch of Trachonitis; for he had chaff thrown into Phiala, and it was found at Paninto, where the ancients thought the fountain-head of the river was, whither it had been therefore carried [by the waters]”. War ch.3. (a gravity-defying storyline...)
maryhelena is online now  
Old 03-31-2011, 01:47 PM   #14
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Orlando
Posts: 2,014
Default

Hi Maryhelena,

The Antigonus crucifixion connection is interesting to me. Crucified Jewish Kings in history are kind of rare. There would need to be more parallels to be a stronger case.

On the other hand the Philip-Bethsaida connection is a little bit harder to see. If Phillip had been from Bethsaida or lived there, instead of just making it a city, the case would be stronger. I assume Philip was a popular name because Greeks ruled Israel from 332 BCE when Alexander conquered it to the 150's, and Alexander's father was named Philip.

Names are easily changed, so I would look for parallel plot structures and parallels in incidents rather than just names in common.

Rockne with the nickname Rock is an interesting parallel to Peter (Petros-Rock) not because Rockne was Peter reincarnated, but because the religious Catholics who ran Notre Dame in the early 20th century might have liked the idea of having somebody named after their Church's founder to be in charge of their football team. It is a fundamentally magical proposition that a name or a word similar to an ancient name or word would cause a similar result (successful church equals successful football team), but religious thinking is in some sense always magical thinking.

One might consider if you would prefer the Coach of your football team to be named James, John, Robert or Mike?

Approximately 10% of American males are named James, John or Robert, but none of the 100 highest paid football coaches (2010) are named James, John or Robert. On the other hand, while less than one percent (only 0.189) of American males are named Mike. Eight out of the 100 highest paid football coaches are named Mike.

The next most popular names for Football Coaches are Mark, Steve and Jim - four each. They all are less than one percent (0.938 %, 0.780 % and 0.118 %) of males in the general American population.

Mike, Mark, Steve and Jim make up 2% of the male names, but 20% of the 100 Highest Paid Football Coaches in the U.S.

I'm not sure why this is. I know that psychological studies show that names do apparently influence occupations that people go into.

Warmly,

Philosopher Jay

Quote:
Originally Posted by maryhelena View Post
Hi, Philosopher Jay
I've added a little more at the end of my chart. Actually, there is even more that could be added but that starts to make things more complicated - and hence requires much more space than a chart allows for.

(For instance I think that Philip did not die when our present copies of Josephus state so - earlier printed copies have a different date - which does not actually take away from the points made in the chart, ie death of JC can likewise be moved on a bit. I have posted elsewhere on this forum re Philip becoming Agrippa I - which would, interestingly, fit in with the JC resurrection storyline where the disciples did not recognize him after the resurrection - well sort of as goes the storyline...)

Basically, what all this does, re the gospel JC storyline, is just that - follow the story - a bit like in any suspicious circumstance - follow the money - so with JC - follow the story. - and don't trip up on any verbal stones on the money trail...

(note: for Stephan Huller - my theory re Philip and Agrippa I has had an update - which might well surprise and please you - but will only update another time..... )
PhilosopherJay is offline  
Old 04-01-2011, 12:52 AM   #15
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: England
Posts: 2,527
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by PhilosopherJay View Post
Hi Maryhelena,

The Antigonus crucifixion connection is interesting to me. Crucified Jewish Kings in history are kind of rare. There would need to be more parallels to be a stronger case.

On the other hand the Philip-Bethsaida connection is a little bit harder to see. If Phillip had been from Bethsaida or lived there, instead of just making it a city, the case would be stronger.
Hi, Philosopher Jay

The Antigonus crucifixion connection is a more recent addition to my theory than the Philip connection. I’ve for many years (25+) been interested in the Philip the Tetrarch connection - and since this historical figure was not crucified, I’ve simply viewed the crucifixion as being the gospel ‘salvation’ storyline ie the dying and rising god mythology. The Antigonus connection simply adds more history to my theory - and of course, gives Paul, some flesh and blood substance upon which to base his Christology theories.

Regarding Philip and the gospel JC figure. What did strike me, after reading both the following quotations, was that JC looked to be a ‘Johnny come lately’ figure - Philip had been doing the rounds of his territory long before JC supposedly did likewise.

Quote:

Josephus: Antiquities of the Jews. Book XV111,ch.1V,par.6.

"About this time it was that Philip, Herod's brother departed this life, in the twentieth year of the reign of Tiberius, after he had been tetrarch of Trachonitis, and Gaulonitis, and of the nation of the Bataneans also, thirty-seven years. He had shewn himself a person of moderation and quietness in the conduct of his life and government; he constantly lived in that country which was subject to him, he used to make his progress with a few chosen friends; his tribunal also, on which he sat in judgement, followed him in his progress; and when any one met him who wanted his assistance, he made no delay, but had his tribunal sat down immediately, wheresoever he happened to be, and sat down upon it, and heard his complaint; he there ordered the guilty that were convicted to be punished, and absolved those that had been accused unjustly. He died at Julias; and when he was carried to that monument which he had already erected for himself beforehand, he was buried with great pomp. His principality Tiberius took (or he left no sons behind him) and added it to the province of Syria, but gave orders that the tributes which arose from it should be collected, and laid up in his tetrarchy."
Quote:
Israelite and Judean History (or via: amazon.co.uk)

'Israelite and Judean History', (Hayes and Miller, 1977 pages 641, 642)

"Jesus was probably born in or near Nazareth...Nothing firm can be said of him until he was about thirty....To present the shape of the career of Jesus is a matter of forming the most probable hypothesis to cover those facts which can be reasonably entertained after radical synoptic criticism. It seems that Jesus believed himself entrusted by God with the reformation of his people for the task of converting the world, that he believed it necessary to win back those who lived among Gentiles in the north in his own Galilee, in southern Syria, in the Decapolis, and in the territory of Philip. He ranged widely over these areas from a headquarters at Capernaum on the north side of the Lake of Galilee,.....His morality was traditional but his intellectual grasp of its basis was original unconventional. More articulate than other Galilean religious figures, he had the extra-ordinary gift both for the poetic expression of his interpretation of his nation's wisdom and for facing men and women with their own crises. Supremely in history his impact challenged both humble individuals and well established authority, the latter disturbed....by his apparent willingness to associate with Rome and its agents."

The gospel writer, writers, in creating their JC character were most probably influenced by historical figures. However, for their literary creation of JC to have any chance of making it on his own, so to speak, then the historical figures that were drawn upon for his creation needed to be sidelined, needed to be kept under wraps. Additionally, of course, Judea was under Roman rule and any messianic ideas re prominent figures would have to be downplayed - both for the safety of the individual involved and for peace with Rome. Not talking the firebrands here who would find some glory in being David against the mighty Roman Goliath. Remember the wonder-worker story in Slavonic Josephus - he was not prepared to go against Rome. And as for Jewish messianic expectations - it’s kingship that is relevant - not nobody carpenters...The gospels pick out Casearea Philippi as the place where JC is asked if he is the messiah. If, historically, any such notions were being voiced re Philip the Tetrarch - then it goes without saying - such notions had better not reach the ears of Rome. Don’t tell, says the gospel JC as he warned, ordered, the disciples not to talk about any messianic notions re his identity.

There are many roadblocks in the way of getting to grips with Philip the Tetrarch...but that’s all part of the fun and games re tracing the origins of early Christianity...
maryhelena is online now  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 10:30 AM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.