Freethought & Rationalism ArchiveThe archives are read only. |
11-06-2005, 02:19 AM | #1 | |
Contributor
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: London UK
Posts: 16,024
|
Divide and Rule
Quote:
Are both Christianity and Islam the result of Roman political experiments to divide and rule that went badly wrong? |
|
11-06-2005, 11:23 AM | #2 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: NJ
Posts: 727
|
The English is so poor in the link it's not even worth the read. Whoever wrote the material can't be a scholar, else the material wouldn't be so poorly written. As such, why would I read the material? IOW's poor quality = no credibility.
|
11-07-2005, 11:48 AM | #3 | |
Contributor
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: London UK
Posts: 16,024
|
The link was only meant as an example - (too quick search on Google!)
I would like discussion about my question: Quote:
I am not arguing this is the sole cause, but could it be one factor that has been ignored in trying to work out why these religions were so successful? |
|
11-07-2005, 12:23 PM | #4 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Minnesota, the least controversial state in the le
Posts: 8,446
|
Were mormonism and scientology invented by the US government to help rule the lawless western part of the country?
It seems obvious to me that cults are born and prosper on their own, in spite of governement interference. Parsimony and common sense say no to the OP. How would making extra religions succeed where the military might, wealth, cultural advantages etc of the Roman empire failed? Religion from conspiracy theories are fun, but not convincing. Did you hear the one about how Amenhotep, son of Hapu, (prime minister of Pharaoh Amenhotep III) wrote the Pentuech to create a religion that would forever worship his master? (now called Yahweh) |
11-08-2005, 03:50 AM | #5 |
Contributor
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: London UK
Posts: 16,024
|
Different political and historical contexts between America and Rome!
Divide and rule is accepted as an important tactic of Imperial Rome isn't it? The Romans were having big problems with the Jews, why should they not sponsor a sect and feed in some pro-roman attitudes? - I thought it was accepted the gospels have some very strong pro-Roman themes. I am not even arguing it was that conscious, it might have been a normal part of their strategies to research the various groups and feed in party lines to the Roman's advantage. You then have a normal co-evolutionary arms race occur, and it looks like xianity had some major survival advantages. Early genetic engineering to improve the stock? |
11-08-2005, 04:04 AM | #6 |
Contributor
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: London UK
Posts: 16,024
|
Is there a huge underestimation of the political, strategic and technological know how of Rome occurring?
We have the personal intervention of several emperors in Palestine during the period of the birth of xianity! A major branch of xianity is based in Rome and the Pope has taken Caesar's title! Chance? The ideas of Sun Tzu - that if you are actually fighting your strategies have gone wrong - and Macchiavelli - say one thing and do another - were not new ideas! Why should not the Romans have experimented with some political ideas? They were good at breeding, why not breed religions? They could not predict they would end up with Frankenstein's monster! |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|