FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > Religion (Closed) > Biblical Criticism & History
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Yesterday at 03:12 PM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 11-06-2004, 07:31 AM   #1
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Canada
Posts: 80
Default The influence of art in ancient biblical interpretation

I came across an interesting article by a Dr. Kessler about the role the artist played in biblical interpretation in ancient times.

He writes that:

Quote:
The biblical story should not be viewed solely from a literary perspective. Artists who created images based on the biblical story should be viewed as exegetes in their own right and their interpretations sometimes vary considerably from the better-known interpretations found in the writings of the church fathers or the rabbis.

Some scholars and religious leaders have criticized these artistic representations, seeing in their diversity the possibility of danger and error. [29] In fact, the artistic portrayal of the Akedah exhibits not errors but interpretations of the biblical text. Sometimes artistic interpretation mirrors liturgical or literary developments; on other occasions, they are not found elsewhere. Artistic interpretation is one form of biblical exegesis and critical to the study of biblical interpretation. In the words of the church father, Gregory of Nyssa, and valid for Jewish as well as Christian art, there are occasions when "art clearly led the story". [30] For this, students of biblical interpretation should be truly grateful.
http://www.bu.edu/mzank/STR/tr-archi...1/Kessler.html

My knowledge of biblical studies is very limited so I was hoping some of our experts here could give me their opinion.

How much influence did the artist have on the development of Christianity and Judaism? Did art lead the story on some occassions as Kessler suggests?

I know the eastern and catholic churches for centuries used art to teach the biblical stories the vast majority who were illiterate. But I'm not sure if religious leaders would let an artist get away depicting something false if they didn't believe it to be true themselves.
Mosor is offline  
Old 11-06-2004, 05:38 PM   #2
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Alberta
Posts: 11,885
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mosor

I know the eastern and catholic churches for centuries used art to teach the biblical stories the vast majority who were illiterate. But I'm not sure if religious leaders would let an artist get away depicting something false if they didn't believe it to be true themselves.
They still do and they still do not promote bible study to avoid rational literalism which is 'the enemy' that got us banned from Eden to start with. Jesus spoke in parables to avoid literalism and in this sense are parables like paintings with words but much more deceptive if we are literate.

My father once told me that studying the bible towards understanding is equal to the yeast of the pharisees and in direct conflict with the concept behind unleavened bread.
Chili is offline  
Old 11-06-2004, 08:30 PM   #3
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Anywhere but Colorado, including non-profits
Posts: 8,787
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mosor
How much influence did the artist have on the development of Christianity and Judaism? Did art lead the story on some occassions as Kessler suggests?
I don't know a lot about this, but I know one thing. Early depictions of the cricifixion involved four nails, one for each limb. Later depictions had one nail for both legs. Which is a bit silly, if you think about it. What are you going to do, stack the ankles on each other and try to get it just right between the tibia and fibula of both legs? The top leg would just bounce around, until you got the nail through. And the heels would get in the way. Or did they drive a nail through one leg into a piece of wood and then pull it out of the wood and put it over the other leg? It seems a lot of work, just to save one nail. Which you get back eventually anyway.

But three seemed to them a meaningful number.
epepke is offline  
Old 11-06-2004, 10:32 PM   #4
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Alberta
Posts: 11,885
Default

Good point, it would make you think that it is a metaphor.
Chili is offline  
Old 11-19-2004, 09:51 PM   #5
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Canada
Posts: 80
Default

No one has answered my question though. Is there any validity to his claim that art influenced biblical interpretation?
Mosor is offline  
Old 11-19-2004, 11:13 PM   #6
Contributor
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Los Angeles area
Posts: 40,549
Default

His claim seems to be that art is a form of interpretation, which seems not very controversial.
Toto is offline  
Old 11-20-2004, 08:10 AM   #7
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Canada
Posts: 80
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Toto
His claim seems to be that art is a form of interpretation, which seems not very controversial.

But did artistic interpretation have a major influence on the development of Christianity and Judaism? I'm most interested in his claim that there are instances where "art clearly led the story".
Mosor is offline  
Old 11-21-2004, 10:04 AM   #8
Contributor
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: London UK
Posts: 16,024
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mosor



I know the eastern and catholic churches for centuries used art to teach the biblical stories the vast majority who were illiterate. But I'm not sure if religious leaders would let an artist get away depicting something false if they didn't believe it to be true themselves.


From Chilli:
They still do and they still do not promote bible study to avoid rational literalism which is 'the enemy' that got us banned from Eden to start with. Jesus spoke in parables to avoid literalism and in this sense are parables like paintings with words but much more deceptive if we are literate.

My father once told me that studying the bible towards understanding is equal to the yeast of the pharisees and in direct conflict with the concept behind unleavened bread.
Superb Chilli!

How do we tell the fundies they are repeating the sin of Adam and Eve?

In Europe, the Puritans went around white washing the Church walls and destroying the multi media experiences many people were having in the late medieval period in the West. A bi product of this is possibly "white goods" in our kitchens - they might all have been intricately decorated - much like trucks still are in Pakistan.

A further bi product of the Western destruction of art is possibly the industrial revolution and the way we damage the planet.

Quote:
depicting something false
This depends on having a religion that has a concept of doctrine and heresy. If artists are allowed to express their understandings authentically, how can that expression be false? When is a musical note false?

Quote:
But did artistic interpretation have a major influence on the development of Christianity and Judaism?
Most definitely, but for various reasons the Church has kept very strong controls on the artists, the mystics, the St Francis's, the Da Vincis, the Holman Hunts and the Dalis who have wreaked havoc!
Clivedurdle is offline  
Old 11-21-2004, 10:15 AM   #9
Contributor
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: London UK
Posts: 16,024
Default

From Umberto Eco Baudolino

Quote:
You Christians do not understand that the sacred text is born from a Voice. The Lord, haqadoch baruch hu, that the holy one, may his name always be blessed , when he speaks to his prophets, allows them to hear sounds, but does not show figures, as you people do, with your illuminated pages. The voice surely provokes images in the heart of the prophet, but these images are not immobile; they liquefy, change shape according to the melody of that voice, and if you want to reduce to images the voice of the Lord, blessed always be his name, you freeze that voice, as if it were fresh water turning to ice that no longer quenches thirst, but numbs the limbs in the chill of death,"
Clivedurdle is offline  
Old 11-21-2004, 11:09 AM   #10
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: NYC
Posts: 590
Default

Mosor

Of course religion is dependant on Art and poetry to create it's paradigm.
Most modern people have an image of Jesus which comes from painting since Jesus is not described in the text.
The book of acts doesn't say how Paul traveled to Damascus yet most Christian's think that he traveled on horse back, this comes from paintings.
If Chagal's or even Nolde's image of a Jewish Jesus was popularized perhaps Christian anti-semitism would end.
Mel Gibson's depiction of the crucifixion threatens to revive the old German passion play's deicidal Jew image.

http://www.freunde-der-nationalgalerie.de/nolde.html

http://holylandnetwork.com/jesus/jesus_art.htm

http://www.abcgallery.com/A/angelico/angelico59.html

http://www.abcgallery.com/B/bosch/bosch70.html

http://www.abcgallery.com/G/giotto/giotto21.html

http://www.abcgallery.com/G/giotto/giotto116.html

http://www.abcgallery.com/G/giotto/giotto5.html

http://www.abcgallery.com/D/duccio/duccio71.html

http://www.abcgallery.com/G/grunewald/grunewald1.html
Baidarka is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:56 AM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.