Freethought & Rationalism Archive

JoeWallack · 04-23-2006, 06:58 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jjramsey

One of the big problems I see with the ErrancyWiki is that it is organized by chapter and verse. This is a problem because errors usually occur in blocks of verses, rather than an isolated verse. It also makes problems when dealing with internal contradictions. If Foo 1:4 contradicts Bar 3:7, where do I document the contradiction, the page for Foo 1:4, the page for Bar 3:7, or both? Organizing by topic would be a much better choice.

JW:
Robert (I assume it's okay to use your real name. I have found it to be useful. Imagine what I would be like if I was hiding behind a fake name) has pointed out that EW (ErrancyWiki) has started adding Organization by Subject. I think the starting point should be Organization by Verse since that is the easiest Referencing. Additionally referencing by Subject would be even better. So I want to gradually move towards both.

I see the Objectives of EW with the following priority:

1) Reference Guide for Errancy related arguments.

2) Equal Opportunity for Counter-Errancy argument.

3) Information Source for the History and current status of the Errancy Position.

4) Related Entertainment such as "Legends Section" which will feature Important/Famous Errancy articles by Skeptical Legends. I have the first such article by Richard Carrier, a summary of and commentary of his Census article, which Peter is working on setting up (right Peter?).

Joseph

http://www.errancywiki.com/index.php/Main_Page

Thread Tools	Search this Thread
Show Printable Version	Search this Thread: Advanced Search

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.