FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > Religion (Closed) > Biblical Criticism & History
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Yesterday at 03:12 PM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 01-21-2004, 06:26 AM   #21
Contributor
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Hudson Valley, NY
Posts: 10,056
Default Re: Re: Re: Light is life and life is light.

Quote:
Originally posted by Amos
Well zeta, I keep thinking of that tree that falls in the forest that makes no noise unless someone is there to hear it and I think the same is true for light.
Ah HA! So THAT'S why the light goes off in the inside of the refrigerator when you close the door!

WMD
Wayne Delia is offline  
Old 01-21-2004, 06:35 AM   #22
Amos
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by NearNihil Experience
"Above said sheep-shankers just didn't know all the science we know and didn't have all the labels we do now.

Just some randomnesss to chew on....
Maybe they tried to tell us that order must be created out of chaos before it can makes sense in our mind which itself is like wasteland where science and labels can be used to give structure to space.
 
Old 01-21-2004, 08:45 AM   #23
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Up Shit Creek
Posts: 1,810
Default

"Maybe they tried to tell us that order must be created out of chaos before it can makes sense in our mind...."

I'm on the opposite track. I find emptiness, silence, darkness, calm and all that to represent perfect structure...not chaos. I see it as potential undecided\unstructured...and any attempt or action taken to fulfill that potential creates more parts to the machine, thereby more structure, more things to go wrong, more chaos. More parts=more chaos.

I think the darkness is hard for people to understand, that pure peace is pure nothingness...that the only perfection is stillness.
The light brought forth ruined this perfection and has sent the universe on a spiral towards chaos and back around again.
It all makes sense in my mind to say chaos is created out of order...as order breaks down.

I also think this common reversal leads to other strange mix-ups in rationale and relationship...but that's another thread I bet.

I never liked Gen 1:1...it seemed so contrary to the realities temporal causation, common sense of system orders and breakdowns, and again was some 4000yr old goat-wrangler's best guess.

"...which itself is like wasteland where science and labels can be used to give structure to space."

They sure do help get by, don' t they?
NearNihil Experience is offline  
Old 01-21-2004, 10:50 AM   #24
Contributor
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: nowhere
Posts: 15,747
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Magus55
Actually, you're incorrect.

Gen 1:1 In the beginning, God created the Heaven and the Earth.

That is creation ex nihilo.
This is typical error of translation being maintained and propagated by those who know no better.

The text starts,

BR'$YT BR' 'LHYM 'T-$MYM W'T-'RC

In the beginning of God's creating the heavens and the earth


and continues with the starting state. How often do I have to repeat the structure of these verses? The first act of creation is given by the divine fiat "Let there be light!"

Quote:
Gen 1:2 then says the Earth was created without form and void - which points out what the Earth was created as when God spoke it into existence. The Earth was most certaintly created ex nihilo.
Wrong again. This is just xian mumbo jumbo of many centuries later, based on inadequate understanding of the Hebrew. The starting state of the cosmos was darkness and waters.

In the beginning of God's creating the heavens and the earth, the world was without form and empty, darkness on the face of the deep and the wind of God hovering on the face of the waters.

Then God said, and note that this is the first act of divine fiat, Let there be light.

Quote:
As to the topic at hand, light was created out of nothing. There was no source of light. God created light by itself to shine on the Earth,...
This is correct.

Quote:
...and then on day 4, created a permanent source to give off the light.
I don't think this is in the passage. The sun was of course created on day 4, but it was a mere inhabitant of the light.

Remember the notion of tohu wabohu (without form and empty):


Code:
  Formation          Population
------------------------------------------------
1 light and dark:  4 sun and moon

2 sea and sky:     5 fish and birds

3 land:            6 animals and humans

spin
spin is offline  
Old 01-21-2004, 10:53 AM   #25
Contributor
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: nowhere
Posts: 15,747
Default

Oh and Magus55, just look at the way the RSV, NRSV and JPS translate Gen 1:1.

Creatio ex nihilo is a platonic idea.


spin
spin is offline  
Old 01-21-2004, 05:08 PM   #26
Amos
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by NearNihil Experience


"...which itself is like wasteland where science and labels can be used to give structure to space."

They sure do help get by, don' t they?
But I don't disagree with you on that. The point made here in Gen.1:1 (NB) is that before chaos can come about structure must be given to unstructured space to make it possible for chaos to be known. In here, order in our mind must exist to make the fall of man possible or darkness would not have followed the first day.

Unstructured space is different than chaos. Unstructered space is like a void with nothing to tie our thoughts to so we can think (period). Chaos is when we absorb data and try to attach this to things we already know. Chaos is fun, or at least, a little chaos is fun for as long as it helps us get wiser.
 
Old 01-22-2004, 09:02 AM   #27
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Up Shit Creek
Posts: 1,810
Default

" The point made here in Gen.1:1 (NB) is that before chaos can come about structure must be given to unstructured space to make it possible for chaos to be known."

I think you missed what I was saying regarding the perception of said beginning state. Its all structure, whether in order or not. Look at it like matter and energy. Energy is just potential to be turned into matter. Imagine a universe filled with 100% energy...now a universe with 100% matter....now 50%\50%....these three have balance as a characteristic, a pureness...structure. I'm saying that 100% chaos is order, and that the universe(no the space its located in) started as 100% energy(potential)....and will end up in chaos, not that it started in chaos and will be brought to order...
...more parts to the machine, the more that can and does go wrong.


" In here, order in our mind must exist to make the fall of man possible or darkness would not have followed the first day. "

I don't think this is necessarily true, but I will say dark makes no sense as a description if light wasn't there to contrast it.


"Unstructured space is different than chaos. Unstructered space is like a void with nothing to tie our thoughts to so we can think (period). Chaos is when we absorb data and try to attach this to things we already know."

I just have a different view on chaos and what makes things chaotic. You seems to be saying its the unrealized potential that is called chaos, because it can lead to anything...potentialy.


"Chaos is fun, or at least, a little chaos is fun for as long as it helps us get wiser."

Ah yes, I am a whatever works kinda guy.

good luck.
NearNihil Experience is offline  
Old 01-22-2004, 12:20 PM   #28
Amos
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by NearNihil Experience
[BIImagine a universe filled with 100% energy...now a universe with 100% matter....now 50%\50%....these three have balance as a characteristic, a pureness...structure. I'm saying that 100% chaos is order, and that the universe(no the space its located in) started as 100% energy(potential)....and will end up in chaos, not that it started in chaos and will be brought to order...
...more parts to the machine, the more that can and does go wrong.

[/B]
Sure there can be order in imbalance but "the mighty wind swept over the waters" to say that it was 'charged' to create spontaneous life and out of this life the the story of Genesis begins to make sense by first separating the heavens and the earth, or by separating sense with no-sense. And then the light was life, and it was good etc.
 
Old 01-23-2004, 01:10 PM   #29
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Southwest USA
Posts: 4,093
Default

It's likely that the first part of Genesis is just a retelling of what was (to them) an ancient Babylonian myth called When on High. The six days of creation mirroring the first six generations of the Babylonian gods and goddesses. This monotheistic adaption of the myth would have been familiar to the people of the area.
Tristan Scott is offline  
Old 01-23-2004, 04:28 PM   #30
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: USA
Posts: 3,794
Default

Quote:
Plus where was god when the snake was talking to eve????
Wandering about the garden looking for Adam. . . .

--J.D.
Doctor X is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 02:01 AM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.