FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > Religion (Closed) > Biblical Criticism & History
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Today at 03:12 PM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 09-22-2005, 07:08 PM   #1
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: none
Posts: 9,879
Default DWD and DWYD

DWD - All of Ruth, all of 1/2 Samuel, very most of 1 Kings, all of 2 Kings, 1 Chronicles 27.32, very most of Psalms, the one Proverbs verse, the one Ecclesiastes verse, all of Isaiah, all of Jeremiah, Ezekiel 34.24, 37.24, and the one Hosea verse

DWYD - 1 Kings 3.14, 11.4, very most of 1 Chronicles, all of 2 Chronicles, all of Ezra, all of Nehemiah, Psalms 122.5, the one Song of Songs verse, Ezekiel 34.23, the one Amos verse, and all of Zechariah

By first glance, it would seem that DWYD is the younger form, but what does that mean for 1 Kings...interpolation? And what about Ezekiel? Thoughts?
Chris Weimer is offline  
Old 09-22-2005, 08:07 PM   #2
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Midwest
Posts: 4,787
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chris Weimer
DWD - All of Ruth, all of 1/2 Samuel, very most of 1 Kings, all of 2 Kings, 1 Chronicles 27.32, very most of Psalms, the one Proverbs verse, the one Ecclesiastes verse, all of Isaiah, all of Jeremiah, Ezekiel 34.24, 37.24, and the one Hosea verse

DWYD - 1 Kings 3.14, 11.4, very most of 1 Chronicles, all of 2 Chronicles, all of Ezra, all of Nehemiah, Psalms 122.5, the one Song of Songs verse, Ezekiel 34.23, the one Amos verse, and all of Zechariah

By first glance, it would seem that DWYD is the younger form, but what does that mean for 1 Kings...interpolation? And what about Ezekiel? Thoughts?
Add Ezekiel 37.25 to your list for דוד.

Perhaps דויד is the later form, as you mention, with the י inserted kind of as a vowel. Later books, such as Ezekiel, could still use the older דוד in an attempt to archaicize. Earlier books with דויד would be scribal misspellings (replacing the archaic spelling with the more familiar).

Just my thoughts.

Ben.
Ben C Smith is offline  
Old 09-22-2005, 08:13 PM   #3
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: rantsnraves.org
Posts: 2,273
Default

Can someone explain what we're talking about?

Oh, ok. A google search seems to indicate that dwd and dwyd are different spellings of 'David'.
Imaginary Mark is offline  
Old 09-23-2005, 02:37 PM   #4
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: none
Posts: 9,879
Default

Oh sorry. I was noting the different spellings of David and perhaps that relates relatively to the dating of the Prophets and Writings (as David isn't mentioned explicitly in the Torah).
Chris Weimer is offline  
Old 09-23-2005, 02:49 PM   #5
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: New York State
Posts: 440
Default

It's possible that they're just different spellings, with no implication of age. Like Jon and John for example.
rob117 is offline  
Old 09-23-2005, 02:57 PM   #6
Contributor
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: nowhere
Posts: 15,747
Default

Here's a nice bit of trivia:

dwd and, by extension, dwyd, mean "beloved". The former however seems also to mean "uncle", so in 1 Chr 27:32, we find Jonathan is dwyd's dwd. Does this mean David's David, David's uncle or David's beloved?


spin
spin is offline  
Old 09-23-2005, 03:33 PM   #7
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: none
Posts: 9,879
Default

I think the obvious is more than answer, nips. However, what have you to say about the speculation above?
Chris Weimer is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 11:30 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.